Discuss 16, 32 and 63 as a rating in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Cookie

-
Reaction score
117
Why are 16, 32 and 63 amps used as an MCB rating instead of 15, 30 and 60 amps? Best theory that I can come up with was when the UK switched to 230 volts this was to make up for the drop in voltage but have noting to back that up.

Here are the ratings I'm familiar with:

View: https://Upload the image directly to the thread.com/a/trtK7pI


The nominal voltages which go along with them:

View: https://Upload the image directly to the thread.com/NFO74Tp
 
The UK never changed voltage.

We had 240/250V as nominal with an allowance to go down a bit and over a tiny bit.

Now we have 230V with an allowance to go up a bit and down a tiny bit.

They are essentially the same voltage range, so in terms of practical changes the UK didn't change.

R'10 preferred values are now used right throughout the industry, unfortunately ratings have only partially moved (6A doesn't fit the series it should be 6.3A, 45A shouldn't fit only fits in R20, R'20, R''20 and so on series )
 
Many different voltages were in use in different areas, from 100 to 250, even different frequencies (and DC) before the national grid standardised all new supplies from around 1931 onwards. The highest voltage in normal use was 250V, so most single-phase accessories were rated for that voltage, and most 3-phase equipment for 500V.

The majority of supplies were 200V or higher, therefore 5A was usually sufficient for 1kW and the 5A multiples approximately corresponded to the kW rating of typical loads.

Typical domestic applications were:
5A - lighting, small outlets
10A - heating, fell out of favour in the 1930s
15A - heating, water heating (stored), large domestic outlets
20A - radial circuit for small numbers of BS1363 outlets and FCU-attached appliances (after 1947)
30A - cooking, ring final circuits for BS1363 outlets (after 1947), main fuses for small installations
45A - large cooking, submains, showers (not then popular)
60A - main fuses

The UK was quite old-fashioned in terms of OCPD choice, we continued to favour rewireable fuses when Europe was increasingly using HRC cartridges. Fuse wire was sold in the above ratings and these were carried over to HRC fuses when we started to get into those. You can still buy cards of fuse wire in hardware stores, with the most popular domestic ratings, 5, 15 & 30A and sometimes 20A.

As the popularity of MCBs increased the first really successful product series also used the multiples of 5A e.g. Crabtree C50 (that's a model number, not a rating), Wylex plug-in and NB types, MK LN / Sentry and other early BS3871 models. We migrated to the Renard number ratings with the rest of Europe in the 1980s. Series that were current at the time existed in both flavours. E.g. MK Sentry Mk.1 can be found with 5A, 6A, 10A, 15A, 16A etc ratings. Many products such as industrial switchgear also made the shift (30-32A, 60-63A etc) with the same basic products being rebadged with the new rating, perhaps with a styling facelift.
 
Renard? Why are these values preferred?
They have (approximately) equal ratios between values.

Like the resistor series (e.g. E12 going 1.0, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 3.9, 4.7, 5.6, 6.8, 8.2) where the steps are based on the same percentage tolerance.
 
when the UK switched to 230 volts this was to make up for the drop in voltage but have noting to back that up.

The UK didn't switch to 230V anywhere but on paper, the national grid didn't magically change voltage overnight, all of the final substation transformers stayed right where they were with a 250/433 output.

Also increasing fuse rating to coincide with a reduction in voltage wouldn't make sense, generally the overall effect would be a slight reduction in load current for the majority of cases.
 
Also increasing fuse rating to coincide with a reduction in voltage wouldn't make sense, generally the overall effect would be a slight reduction in load current for the majority of cases.

I see it like this-

15 x 240= 3,600 va

16 x 230= 3,680 va

Although that assume the load will actually be rated 230 vs 240 volts.
 
Good point.

But still not so sure about MCBs.

The way it was explained to me is that the series of values aids in coordination and discrimination between breakers.

If you take the series
16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50, 63, 80, 100
then from each point, if you go up TWO steps, then that value is ~1.6x where you started, and your downstream breaker should now reliably trip before the upstream.
 
The way it was explained to me is that the series of values aids in coordination and discrimination between breakers.

If you take the series
16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50, 63, 80, 100
then from each point, if you go up TWO steps, then that value is ~1.6x where you started, and your downstream breaker should now reliably trip before the upstream.


IF you're in the thermal region, right?
 
Yes, the thermal curves provide selectivity, but once you hit the magnetic trip there is very little.

But for fuses it is generally OK for BS88 style at a 1:1.6 sort of ratio, but to be sure you would normally go for a 1:2 ratio. For example, if you have a 80A DNO fuse then a 40A fuse-switch to feed something (out building DB, whatever) then wherever happens on the end of that won't take out your main supply.

Getting selectivity MCB to fuse is hard as well, but often if you have a 1:2 ratio and B-curve you get a usable level, e.g. 20A B-curve & 40A fuse is going to be to PFC of around 900A which, depending on cable length, might never be reached so the fuse lives past a MCB trip on a hard fault.
 
Yes, the thermal curves provide selectivity, but once you hit the magnetic trip there is very little.

But for fuses it is generally OK for BS88 style at a 1:1.6 sort of ratio, but to be sure you would normally go for a 1:2 ratio. For example, if you have a 80A DNO fuse then a 40A fuse-switch to feed something (out building DB, whatever) then wherever happens on the end of that won't take out your main supply.

Getting selectivity MCB to fuse is hard as well, but often if you have a 1:2 ratio and B-curve you get a usable level, e.g. 20A B-curve & 40A fuse is going to be to PFC of around 900A which, depending on cable length, might never be reached so the fuse lives past a MCB trip on a hard fault.


Good to know.

RK-1 and RK-5 fuses will achieve 100% selective coordination up to 200,000 amps provided a 2:1 ratio.
 

Reply to 16, 32 and 63 as a rating in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

I’m running wires to the basement for future basement finishing. I’d like to add two circuits of outlets (one on the finished side and one on the...
Replies
0
Views
558
Hello, I live in Mexico, where I have a small, un-official trailer park on my property. The property is serviced by my privately owned, 650amp...
Replies
9
Views
1K
I thought that I posted this in the DIY part of the forum but I believe I did not. I am sorry about that. I put in a 10' x 20' metal shed about...
Replies
2
Views
978
I'm thinking, and while I could be wrong, is the adiabatic method a possible latent safety hazard? As well as undersized CPCs on circuits 32 amps...
Replies
15
Views
2K
I have a 230 Volt single-phase circuit with a 100 Amp cutout fuse and a 100 Amp MCB switch, so the supply is rated at 23 kVA. Only about 13% of...
Replies
54
Views
6K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock