Discuss Are modern storage heaters more efficient than old ones in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:   American Electrical Advice Forum

Reaction score
168
Would a brand new storage heater would be any more efficient than an older (circa 1970's) model ? I have not looked at any to compare as yet, but as they both heat up concrete blocks cant really see much difference tbh, anyone know ?
 
No, still one in one out.

They may be better insulated and make use of the stored heat better allowing for more controllable heat output.

At a stretch you could argue they are less likely to need a second source 'boost' late in the day?

Yeah that's kinda what I was suspecting, thanks :)
 
So the heat outlet is now at the bottom so heat cant naturally escape out the old flap that used to be at the top, they rely on a fan to blow air up through the bricks and back down an outlet at the bottom so they should be more efficient that they hold onto the heat until this fan is timed to come on. It also allegedly learns exactly how much heat to put into the bricks.

BUT, they have the ability to use 1 element to boost the core temperature if it is dropping late in the day, or if its stone cold itl just blow warm air out, but obviously this element can run on peak rate, so will cost more, also the extra installation costs needing second supply to them, aaaannd the increase in initial price over a old one, theeennnn, electronics ie screen, fan, pcb, to go wrong, I dont know how cost effective they are.
 
So the heat outlet is now at the bottom so heat cant naturally escape out the old flap that used to be at the top, they rely on a fan to blow air up through the bricks and back down an outlet at the bottom so they should be more efficient that they hold onto the heat until this fan is timed to come on. It also allegedly learns exactly how much heat to put into the bricks.

BUT, they have the ability to use 1 element to boost the core temperature if it is dropping late in the day, or if its stone cold itl just blow warm air out, but obviously this element can run on peak rate, so will cost more, also the extra installation costs needing second supply to them, aaaannd the increase in initial price over a old one, theeennnn, electronics ie screen, fan, pcb, to go wrong, I dont know how cost effective they are.

Thats all good info cheers; the customer would like the option of instant heat out of hours as it Eco7, and so would need another supply. The costs do skyrocket thou with minimal in the way of efficiency savings.
 
I have fitted quite a few of those Dimplex heaters recently and they do seem to be very controllable units. Still a pita lugging bricks upstairs but at least they are small packs! Can be a royal pain in the ar5e getting a peak supply to them as well, and damn they ain't cheap!!
 
NEW POST on OLD THEME

Went to look at a job the other day 'upgrading 'Basic' storage heaters'!
The client said that when they moved in the flat was nice and cosy but had BIG electricity bills!
So they turned the heaters down (and off in one room rarely used) and found that the bills were a lot less, but COLD!
They had been given some advice to upgrade to Dimplex Quantum.
I tried to explain that unfortunately they cant have it both ways 'cheap' bills and cosy house!
I have never fitted Quantum but said that I would also need to install a 24hour supply to each heater which the client clearly didn't comprehend.
But the crux of the matter was that I could not 'guarantee' that the bills would be less despite the advisor saying the Quantum are more efficient!
I couldn't see that there would being sufficient benefit in upgrading from old but working basic storage heaters to quantum in terms of output v bills let alone any return on the capital cost.
I walked away in the end ……………… Would you have done the same or see things differently?
 
Have we got any ,temperature ,heat retention graphs. Old to new.
(I too remember putting jumpers on in cold evenings ,waiting for ECO-7 to top
up my frugal landlords heating solution)
..Any space tech vacuum flask materials ..!
 
NEW POST on OLD THEME

Went to look at a job the other day 'upgrading 'Basic' storage heaters'!
The client said that when they moved in the flat was nice and cosy but had BIG electricity bills!
So they turned the heaters down (and off in one room rarely used) and found that the bills were a lot less, but COLD!
They had been given some advice to upgrade to Dimplex Quantum.
I tried to explain that unfortunately they cant have it both ways 'cheap' bills and cosy house!
I have never fitted Quantum but said that I would also need to install a 24hour supply to each heater which the client clearly didn't comprehend.
But the crux of the matter was that I could not 'guarantee' that the bills would be less despite the advisor saying the Quantum are more efficient!
I couldn't see that there would being sufficient benefit in upgrading from old but working basic storage heaters to quantum in terms of output v bills let alone any return on the capital cost.
I walked away in the end ……………… Would you have done the same or see things differently?

Every manufacturer advises their products as being “the one”

Rointe for example have stacks of literature, laboratory results etc showing their heaters being most efficient against Quantum for one.

They only need a 24hr supply, removing the off peak completely (which also removes the inflated day rate!)

However, these are also expensive to buy
 
As technology improves for battery storage, it may well be most cost effective to use battery storage.
Recharge overnight at cheep rate, use battery for daytime use and shortly before night rate comes on again, push any spare charge you have left Back into the grid tor a rebate.

I don’t think the maths work out just yet but soon as battery costs continue to reduce it may well be a winner.

Some manufacturers are already selling devices that do this but at the moment they are too expensive for the masses.
 
As technology improves for battery storage, it may well be most cost effective to use battery storage.
Recharge overnight at cheep rate, use battery for daytime use and shortly before night rate comes on again, push any spare charge you have left Back into the grid tor a rebate.

I don’t think the maths work out just yet but soon as battery costs continue to reduce it may well be a winner.

Some manufacturers are already selling devices that do this but at the moment they are too expensive for the masses.
The maths don't stack up at all... I worked it all out a while ago. Just looking at the materials cost, using the cheapest available and 2nd hand where practical, the payback period is >20years. This period is beyond the useful life of most of the equipment !

For the UK, the price of grid supplied electricity is still too cheap to warrant pv/battery solutions. If it doubles in price, viable options start to emerge...
 
This industry plays off a misinterpretation of efficiency in my opinion, the literature is often complex and full of diagrams and calculations that most of the population will just not be able to comprehend and often implies cheaper, money saving revolution to the ignorant, a tactic often used by the beauty industry when they make up scientific words and terms to make their product to sound like the real thing.

The cost of heating the bricks in a storage heater costs the same if we assume like for like bricks in old and new and electric costs back in the 70's as it does now, one can make them more efficient only by ensuring they are not storing more heat than required, or ensuring it isn't released too quickly thus a boost is used if available, this idea has been used for decades in the form of air temp' stats that allow the charge up duration to be altered according to ambient air temp' be it automatic or manual... modern storage heaters may use better tech' and be more reliable but at the end of the day it costs the same amount to heat the same room up and maintain a constant ambient temp', the only way you can improve on this is to stop the heat delivered from escaping which of course is not about the efficiency of your storage heater but that of your house to retain that heat in and also to add, it would be much cheaper to heat homes up if people just put a ruddy jumper on and stop expecting sauna like conditions.

All I really see is modern storage heaters may use less material and have better insulation and control which can be argued makes them more efficient but at the end of the day this is not how they are often sold to the end user, they cannot deliver more energy out than is input relative to storage heaters of decades past, they can only control the output of heat better to deliver a more stable temp' across the day but like I said, this is not new to modern heaters.
 
( Things are better than the old musical Joke - I can hope )
I'm playing all the right notes ,but no necessarily in the correct order.
..You get 100% of your heat back - but maybe when you don't want it !..
 
The general feeling I'm getting is that there is no great advantage 'upgrading' to quantum (or similar) and with Little Sparks reference to Rointe may be that due to being on 'peak rate' may work out more expensive in the long run.
 
The general feeling I'm getting is that there is no great advantage 'upgrading' to quantum (or similar) and with Little Sparks reference to Rointe may be that due to being on 'peak rate' may work out more expensive in the long run.
Peak/off Peak rate tariff schemes don't really work UNLESS the homeowner dedicates their life to switching usage into the Off Peak period. This is not easy and often very expensive to do... as a minimum, washing machines and dishwashers may need to be changed to ones with a delayed start function. Larger hot water tanks may be needed to ensure that it's all heated at night.... it really is something you have to dedicate your life to. And after all this... you might save a few £'s every year.

I'd rather spend the money on upgrading insulation !
 
Every manufacturer advises their products as being “the one”

Rointe for example have stacks of literature, laboratory results etc showing their heaters being most efficient against Quantum for one.

They only need a 24hr supply, removing the off peak completely (which also removes the inflated day rate!)

However, these are also expensive to buy

Rointe were misrepresenting the truth
 

Rointe were misrepresenting the truth

Wow!
I did not know about this, but I did remember reading their brochure about “unsafe” gas boilers.
I’ve fitted just a handful of Rointe, and they were the customers choice in the first place... so I’m not likely to be asked back to change them.

So what is a good electric heater that doesn’t use off peak? Ie, one supply instead of an off peak AND a 24hr
 

Reply to Are modern storage heaters more efficient than old ones in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock