Cooker switch replacement

[Spazz]

I just had someone ask me to replace a cooker switch, like for like - thats not Part P is it?

Has someone got a list of whats Part P and not?

 

[wallyanker]

I would say no... Not notifiable.

Yes, it is in a "special" location but a like for like in a "special" location is acceptable. Eg.. Replacing a shower for another shower with the same kw rating is not notifiable, even though it is in a bathroom.

 

[Goody]

I just had someone ask me to replace a cooker switch, like for like - thats not Part P is it?

Has someone got a list of whats Part P and not?

It’s Part-P if anything to do with a domestic environment but since it’s like-for-like swap, it doesn’t call for notification..

 

[Spazz]

Sorry ment notifiable.

I know its Part P - lol

 

[Octopus]

Replacing a switch/socket is maintenance and therefore not notifiable.

That said a check of the EFLI and noted on the invoice is the way to go.

 

[Spazz]

Just found this

 

[Richard Burns]

That list is correct but it would be a good idea to work from the Approved document part P guidance available for free download from the planningportal.
I have attached the pages relating to notification for reference.
View attachment Notifiable work from Part P guide.pdf

 

[brman]

actually the doc Nicholas found (comes from one of the scheme providers I think?) says that upgrading supplementary bonding in special locations is notifiable. Not true if you read the exert from Richard.

 

[bureaucrazy]

Is it notifiable to change a 45A cooker control unit incorporating a 13A socket with a simple 45A cooker switch without any socket?

 

[simpson93]

No it is not notifable

bit of an old thred to dig up