Discuss eicr coding (bathroom) in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net
Ah ok.But if the piping has insulated sections between these points or before all accessible pipework in the bathroom they wouldn't have continuity and if it was insulated inside the bathroom before accessibility they wouldn't necessarily be extraneous. But I'm sure that's been checked. Also if none of the above applied but the continuity between the cpc of the fittings and the extraneous conductive parts had a low enough impedance to allow the protective device to disconnect in the correct time , then it could be assumed that there is supplementary bonding, just a thought.all pipework was copper as observed and would be connected via the boiler , via the gas and water both which have 10mm bonding.
at one point i used to code these as C2 but im struggling to find any danger from a pullcord and a ip65 rated class 2 fiting on the celing.
Reply to eicr coding (bathroom) in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.