Nobody has said it is unsafe for continued use. It has been deemed unsatisfactory.
Unsafe and unsatisfactory mean different things.
Oh I see
Ok, Lets pretend. I am the customer you are the electrician.
I need an EICR and I am requesting the report and paying for the inspection. Any relevant questions at this stage you as the electrician would ask. (Extent perhaps - sayin')
6 circuits in the board and out of the 6 you tell me only 4 have been inspected because 2 you could not trace.
Turning to my EICR based on model form which you have completed.
Page 1 lets fill this part in:
'Overall assessment of the installation in terms of its suitability for continued use - SATISFACTORY / UNSATISFACTORY (delete as appropriate)'
What are you going to delete?
Turning to the observations and coding. I see the two circuits you have not identified are coded F. I.
I read the notes and see these are issues that require further investigation WITHOUT DELAY (caps mine).
Sounds serious so I read the notes on the EICR and now ask you a few questions
"Why should these circuits be traced WITHOUT DELAY ?" " I see it says they could be potentially dangerous, what makes you believe they are potentially dangerous?"
I need a SATISFACTORY finding on the EICR (Extent - whats that then) so you agree to come back a second time to trace the circuits you have not traced this time. For a fee (obviously).
Do you start ripping up my new floors, cut holes in my decorated walls and take down sections of ceiling to find these two pesky cables?