Pete's Videos I know it's old hat.

[Deleted member 26818]

This is going on somewhat, I don't see why you cannot except (or agree) that an individual (other than owner) can be prosecuted under Part P regs for either failing to notify or incorrect design or installation (the later uses BS7671 as the standard). There are examples of each in the links from my previous post.

Because only the householder or the person ordering the work can be prosecuted for failing to notify.
When I say person ordering the work, I’m thinking housing associations, Local Authorities, private landlords, etc.
An Electrician could be prosecuted if in the course of their work, they drill through a support beam and compromise the structural integrity of said beam.
Another scenario could be if the Electrician compromised the the fire protection or the sound insulation.

 

[Midwest]

Because only the householder or the person ordering the work can be prosecuted for failing to notify.
When I say person ordering the work, I’m thinking housing associations, Local Authorities, private landlords, etc.
An Electrician could be prosecuted if in the course of their work, they drill through a support beam and compromise the structural integrity of said beam.
Another scenario could be if the Electrician compromised the the fire protection or the sound insulation.

I give up.

I've given published examples, but you still will not except it. I think you have your own personal agenda.

 

[Toneyz]

One scheme then no competition which was the original intention. Then as you say the yearly fee of £50.

In this respect, this is how for gas with Gas Safe they have got it right although I have never understood how or why Corgie was done away with. The NICEIC would have been best placed to take on this role at the time all these schemes are here to make a profit.