Discuss is it 230v or 240v? in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net

D

Discharged

Why is mains domestic power referred to as either 230v or 240v? Why not settle on just one of them? (My limited knowledge tells me that the reality is usually 243v or 237v - is that right?)

Cheers.
 
The supply industry has actually done nothing physical to reduce the nominal supply voltage from 240V to 230V, it's still 240V open circuit at the terminals of the local supply transformer. What has changed, as part of European harmonisation (Cenelec HD472), the declared nominal voltage has changed from 240v +-6% (between 225.6 and 254.4V) to 230V +10% -6% (between 216.2 and 253V), very little change, just a slightly wider margin at the lower end. This suits the DNO's just fine as it gives them a bigger window of acceptable supply voltage in rural areas, without the associated costs rewinding transformers or tap changing.
Note:- A second round of change in the declared nominal supply voltage (Cenelec HD472-S2) 230V +-10% is pending, it was due on 1/1/2008 but has yet to be implemented in the UK.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can dress it up however you want to, what you have is what you have, ...and that's 415/240V
The rest is just hot air and the land of make believe!! lol!!! I guess you can call it the same as creative accounting... lol!!!:rofl:
 
ive had issues with security systems with monitored power supplies that throw a wobbly at anything over 250v and quite often see it rise to 253-255v on site in off peak times,advise customer to complain to dno and surprise theres no fault to be found but the supply voltage is a nice 235v on next visit..
 
The supply industry has actually done nothing physical to reduce the nominal supply voltage from 240V to 230V, it's still 240V open circuit at the terminals of the local supply transformer. What has changed, as part of European harmonisation (Cenelec HD472), the declared nominal voltage has changed from 240v +-6% (between 225.6 and 254.4V) to 230V +10% -6% (between 216.2 and 253V), very little change, just a slightly wider margin at the lower end. This suits the DNO's just fine as it gives them a bigger window of acceptable supply voltage in rural areas, without the associated costs rewinding transformers or tap changing.
Note:- A second round of change in the declared nominal supply voltage (Cenelec HD472-S2) 230V +-10% is pending, it was due on 1/1/2008 but has yet to be implemented in the UK.
I think you'll find that it used to be 240V + or - 10%.
The 6% only came in with the change to 230V.
If you do the calculations, you'll find both come out at 216V.
The only thing that has really changed, is that the suppliers are now not allowed to supply a voltage over 253V, whereas in the past they were allowed up to 264V.
 
I think you'll find that it used to be 240V + or - 10%.
The 6% only came in with the change to 230V.
If you do the calculations, you'll find both come out at 216V.
The only thing that has really changed, is that the suppliers are now not allowed to supply a voltage over 253V, whereas in the past they were allowed up to 264V.

The 240v +/- 6% is correct the 230v +10% was done so as not to disadvantage the uk supply industry as it lowered the allowed upper voltage marginally from 254v to 253v
 
if your filling in certs its 230v 400v as this "standard " was harmonised with the rest of europe Older sparks like myself still refer to 240 n 415 tho
 
.....and no you can't try and cheat cable voltage drop calculations by starting off at 245V......
 
I very rarely see 230V on local sites, usually hovers around the 240- 245 mark. But then I live in a place where we don't get mobile phone reception and TV arials are 10ft high and Father Christmas takes up all the parking spaces. The positives are nobody worries too much about 3% on lighting circuits.
As stated previously, Uo = 400V/230V;
As stated in BS7671 app. 2 Uo = 230V +10% / -6% which equates to 216.2V - 253V
 
Just out of interest, does anyone know if as the DNO's are building new sub stations and installing new transformers on poles, if they're done at 230? Because, wouldn't they use slightly less metal in the windings and therefore be cheaper??
 

Reply to is it 230v or 240v? in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hello, this is my first post here. I have a little experience with most types of household wiring through a decade of DIY remodeling, and...
Replies
0
Views
760
Been round to a house to quote to replace some storage heaters for new panel heaters and came across a strange (to me at least) way of wiring the...
Replies
23
Views
4K
Hello, I’ve got an issue driving me crazy and can’t get anyone to figure it out as it’s not their issue. We had a new extension, single rear...
Replies
9
Views
982
Hello All and happy new year. Over the holiay I have changed all of my old sockets to some nice new ones and added a couple with usb sockets for...
Replies
4
Views
740
Hello, I have a EV charger that is reporting over voltage and is unable to charge. the charger will operate up to 253V The solar inverter reports...
Replies
6
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock