Discuss Lighting spur off a ring in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
88
This is just a 'not sure' why question.

when spurring off a ring circuit for a small light circuit, why does it have to be fused down to 3 or 5 amp. Why can't you use 2.5mm cable instead as the mcb is protecting the cable. Is it because most switches are only designed for the lower ampage.

please don't jump down my throat, I always do it the correct way it's just a ponder.
 
Well both reasons I'd say, the switchgear is only rated at 10A usually I think, plus if you used 1.5mm cable it cannot take as much current as the breaker on a normal 32A ring thus damaging the cable or over heating it etc should you overload the spur. And you theoretically could expose the fitting or switchgear to more than its rated at should you use a 10A switch to switch a light fitting and washer etc..

I suppose you argue to say you have designed it so that it's only one light on the spur and know it physically cannot draw any more but I guess that's not the point as some dosey person might then extend it further and stick a double socket and dishwasher on it.

If you fuse it down correctly, it will safely protect the cable, if you don't, take a double socket as a spur with a bit of 2.5mm, you could say you could plug extensions in that and draw up 26A, but 2.5mm one leg can only take 24A, anyway, my point is, fuse it down and you know it's protected even if it gets modified by a numty in the future.
 
Last edited:
This is just a 'not sure' why question.

when spurring off a ring circuit for a small light circuit, why does it have to be fused down to 3 or 5 amp. Why can't you use 2.5mm cable instead as the mcb is protecting the cable. Is it because most switches are only designed for the lower ampage.

please don't jump down my throat, I always do it the correct way it's just a ponder.
DIY question.
 
Most lighting fixtures including BC and ES lampholders are designed to be protected at a maximum of 16A. Connecting an ordinary lampholder to an RFC protected at 32A would therefore be unacceptable. However, it might be compliant (although not necessarily recommended) to fuse the lighting spur at 13A.
 
Most lighting fixtures including BC and ES lampholders are designed to be protected at a maximum of 16A. Connecting an ordinary lampholder to an RFC protected at 32A would therefore be unacceptable. However, it might be compliant (although not necessarily recommended) to fuse the lighting spur at 13A.

I thought most were 10A? I know MK light switches are sold as 10A 2 way etc...
 
I thought most were 10A? I know MK light switches are sold as 10A 2 way etc...

Yes but that is for the load it is actually switching, you would need a fair amount of lights on that switch to exceed 10A, where that genuinely is the case (commercial/industrial) you tend to find the switch controls a contactor.
 
Yes but that is for the load it is actually switching, you would need a fair amount of lights on that switch to exceed 10A, where that genuinely is the case (commercial/industrial) you tend to find the switch controls a contactor.

Quite true, the beauty of contactors, you can literally switch anything!
 
This is just a 'not sure' why question.

when spurring off a ring circuit for a small light circuit, why does it have to be fused down to 3 or 5 amp. Why can't you use 2.5mm cable instead as the mcb is protecting the cable. Is it because most switches are only designed for the lower ampage.

please don't jump down my throat, I always do it the correct way it's just a ponder.

would never consider it unless in a shed fed from a spur unit off the ring
okay in commercial lighting but a right pita in a domestic ceiling rose

anything else?
 
Saw one on a house renovation programme the other day,2 wall lights mounted above twin sockets and a lovely line of new plaster between the 2,not an fcu in sight
 

Reply to Lighting spur off a ring in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi guys, newbie posting! Does the following sound ok... Existing circuit: SOCKET on a ring -> spur to SWITCHED 3A FCU -> SWITCH -> hardwired FAN...
Replies
11
Views
657
Hi, if getting back to the CU is not an option, instead of spurring off a socket via a Sfs putting the rating down to 13a. Could you spur off the...
Replies
43
Views
2K
Ok. Can you cut a ring in half, add junction box, then run a spur off it? I thought it had to be from a socket? Mate of mine wanted me to see if...
Replies
3
Views
746
Evening all, Been to a job on Fri where the customer had a condition report completed. Two of the remedial identified was that there were too...
Replies
7
Views
1K
Hi Guys, Long time member and not a regular user here. I do pop in here when the odd unknown pop's up and unable to locate an electrical dilemma...
Replies
4
Views
851

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock