P
Phaze-3
Hi,
Firstly, i am new to this forum and am looking forward to hopefully getting invovled in some of the topics discussed. But my first post is going to be a question.
I visited a site yesterday we regularly do new install work for and the client asked me the question on periodic inspection and testing the site. He asked me what is the minimum he can get away with doing.
Now, in the past we have done periodic inpection and testing on sites and generally we do 100% testing and inspection (Not very big sites). 1 particular job in the past which was a huge site, we agreed with the customer that a 100% visual and 10% test of circuits in each DB was to be done. We would then go further into the DB's if defects were found visually and under test.
The client wants me to send him information on what the minimum is allowed. I understand that if there are no previous records of testing that a 100% test and inspect would be 'recommended' but there are previous records so what do you guys think??
Thanks
Phaze-3
Firstly, i am new to this forum and am looking forward to hopefully getting invovled in some of the topics discussed. But my first post is going to be a question.
I visited a site yesterday we regularly do new install work for and the client asked me the question on periodic inspection and testing the site. He asked me what is the minimum he can get away with doing.
Now, in the past we have done periodic inpection and testing on sites and generally we do 100% testing and inspection (Not very big sites). 1 particular job in the past which was a huge site, we agreed with the customer that a 100% visual and 10% test of circuits in each DB was to be done. We would then go further into the DB's if defects were found visually and under test.
The client wants me to send him information on what the minimum is allowed. I understand that if there are no previous records of testing that a 100% test and inspect would be 'recommended' but there are previous records so what do you guys think??
Thanks
Phaze-3