Advertisement - Content continues below
Advertisement - Content continues below

Discuss PIR coding in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

R

Rob

Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:  American Electrical Advice Forum

I noticed on an inspection today that all switches I opened to inspect were wired red and black with no red sleeving to identify the black as a live. Seemed to be the same throughout the property although the spark who wired it took the trouble of sleeving at the ceiling roses?!

I appreciate its not crime of the century but still poor practise and needs to be sleeved for an important reason. I would regard this as a code 2 but wondered if because its been done at the ceiling roses and not at any of the switches is this a code 4? Was it once upon a time not a requirement???

Cheers.
 
Aico 3000 Range
This official sponsor may provide discounts for members
Advertisement - Content continues below
R

Rob

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
Then of course in the schedule of inspection theres the "identification of conductors" box. Does this mean it gets a big fat cross?

Appreciate your guidance.

Thanks.
 
W

wayne

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
rob,
i would say code 4 .as for the inspection tick box,well you inspected it .that you found it wrong gets noted on the observations sheet
 

ian.settle1

-
Mentor
Arms
I noticed on an inspection today that all switches I opened to inspect were wired red and black with no red sleeving to identify the black as a live. Seemed to be the same throughout the property although the spark who wired it took the trouble of sleeving at the ceiling roses?!

I appreciate its not crime of the century but still poor practise and needs to be sleeved for an important reason. I would regard this as a code 2 but wondered if because its been done at the ceiling roses and not at any of the switches is this a code 4? Was it once upon a time not a requirement???

Cheers.

Can depend upon the age of the installation as at one time the was noe requirement to identfy s/w etc.
 
R

Rob

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
Thanks for those replies.

I have also noted that there are main equipotential bonding to bothe the gas and water present in 10mm cable, however the connection to the main incoming water pipe isnt within the specified 300mm from the stop cock / intake.

Another code 4?

The house is a two storey terraced property. I understand the scope of a periodic is to inspect and test the condition of the exsisting fixed wiring of the property but I have noticed that there is only one mains operated smoke alarm in the hall downstairs and not one upstairs.
I imagine this is more a building regs issue and although its not really something that would effect the results of a PIR would I be right in assuming that it would be good practise to advise the owner that it would be in his interests to get another smoke alarm installed interlinked with the first, especially as bedrooms are upstairs?

Look forward to your replies...
 
P

PAUL M

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
reg 544.1.2 states that the connection should be made within 6oomm of the stop tap and before any branch pipework.where did you get 300mm from?
 
R

Rob

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #8
Of course, 547-02-02 in the 16th states within 600mm of the service meter or point of entry to building.

Sorry mate, I was discussing yesterday in work the 300mm minimum distance for a socket outlet from a sink in kitchens etc.

Think my brain was still thinking of that. :eek:

As it goes the connection is around 2.5m from the point of entry so is still over permitted.
 
W

wayne

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
rob, without looking in the regs i dont think a minimum distance is stated for a socket to sink .......could be wrong
 
R

Rob

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #10
No I am 99% sure it isnt in BS 7671 Wayne. 300mm is the guide given by the NICEIC. Think theres some mention of it in building regulations.
 
T

tony.towa

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #12
If I remember rightly the requirement for identifying the switched live at the switching point came in at the same time as the requirement for lighting circuits to have a cpc (mid 1960s?). (Before you ask I was not a sparks then!!!).
The single smoke alarm is actually ok as the building regs requirement applies to new builds and newly refurbished dwelling houses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
P

prideofengland

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #13
Rob

Check out Best Practice guide 4 from the ESC website (free download) usfull section at back on how to code periodics. Gives this one a code 4.
 
H

heathelect

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #14
i started work in 1975 and they didnt identify black cores with sleeving then, it happened a few years later if ive remebered correctly, dave
 
Advertisement - Content continues below

Reply to PIR coding in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

SuperlecDirect - ElectriciansForums.net Electrical Suppliers
This official sponsor may provide discounts for members
Advertisement - Content continues below
Top Bottom