- Reaction score
- 706
Just wondered what evryones thoughts were on the EICR coding system now that we have had it for a while.
To get the ball rolling, I initially whinged about it, however I have now decided its an improvement. in that:
- You will no longer see the same list of Code 2's when returning a couple years later
- Its less ambiguous, sometimes I used to be a bit indecisive aon whether certain code 2's should fail or not.
- The C1 bracket is better, as in it only includes dangerous faults (not 'no ring continuity')
Bad bits:
- That girt 'tick sheet' on the NIC paperwork, although the paperwork I use is much simplified.
Discuss!
To get the ball rolling, I initially whinged about it, however I have now decided its an improvement. in that:
- You will no longer see the same list of Code 2's when returning a couple years later
- Its less ambiguous, sometimes I used to be a bit indecisive aon whether certain code 2's should fail or not.
- The C1 bracket is better, as in it only includes dangerous faults (not 'no ring continuity')
Bad bits:
- That girt 'tick sheet' on the NIC paperwork, although the paperwork I use is much simplified.
Discuss!