Discuss Practicality of 400 volt equipment in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:   American Electrical Advice Forum

Cookie

-
Reaction score
117
Would it be practical, or technically possible to economically mass produce 400 volt single phase consumer goods? Light bulbs, kettles, heaters, chargers, TVs, hobs, vacuum cleaners, washers, dryers, microwaves, tools, ect ect?

I'm thinking this would save a lot of copper and make wiring both easier and safer. A 1mm2 cable on a 10 amp breaker would give 4,000 watts of power.
 
Would it be practical, or technically possible to economically mass produce 400 volt single phase consumer goods? Light bulbs, kettles, heaters, chargers, TVs, hobs, vacuum cleaners, washers, dryers, microwaves, tools, ect ect?

I'm thinking this would save a lot of copper and make wiring both easier and safer. A 1mm2 cable on a 10 amp breaker would give 4,000 watts of power.
I'm confused Mate by your conclusions.
 
UK regulation 559.5.1.201 limits lamp holders to 250V.
The biggest cost with cable is usually the installation so reducing the cable size would not save that much. 400V accessories would be bigger and more expensive.
 
It doesn't really matter, different places may settle on different voltages to suit their situation, higher voltages will have issues/costs associated with risk of shock or additional insulation needs etc. Lower voltages with lower shock risk, higher losses and additional costs of conductors etc.

What balance you choose is up to you. In the main internationaly the standard throughout the world is in the 200-250v range - commonly 230v .

This is generally the best balance between all the factors, now it is the main standard most equipment is designed for this voltage, therefore more countries use it, so it's more of a standard, etc.

However there are some countries that are an exception to that in the 110/117v range, these are often purely historical, but once again once in this loop standard voltage - more products - more of a standard etc.
 
UK regulation 559.5.1.201 limits lamp holders to 250V.
The biggest cost with cable is usually the installation so reducing the cable size would not save that much. 400V accessories would be bigger and more expensive.

Can't T&E take 230 volts line to earth? How much does 1mm2 T&E cost vs 2/5mm2 T&E per meter?
 
It doesn't really matter, different places may settle on different voltages to suit their situation, higher voltages will have issues/costs associated with risk of shock or additional insulation needs etc. Lower voltages with lower shock risk, higher losses and additional costs of conductors etc.

What balance you choose is up to you. In the main internationaly the standard throughout the world is in the 200-250v range - commonly 230v .

This is generally the best balance between all the factors, now it is the main standard most equipment is designed for this voltage, therefore more countries use it, so it's more of a standard, etc.

However there are some countries that are an exception to that in the 110/117v range, these are often purely historical, but once again once in this loop standard voltage - more products - more of a standard etc.


Agree. Though would 400 volt as a standard cost more then having 230 volts as a standard?
 
Bizarre idea. And why stop at 400V? Go for 1500V and save even more copper!!


400 volts is already in place, above 1000 volts installations require significantly more complex insulation for guard against partial discharge plus the disconnection times would be difficult if not impossible to achieve.
 
400 volts is already in place, above 1000 volts installations require significantly more complex insulation for guard against partial discharge plus the disconnection times would be difficult if not impossible to achieve.

Why - many large industrial sites use 3.3kV motors and so on.

The voltage isn't fixed at 230 (or 110) - that's just the most suitable for most end users taking into account the factors.

Like why we use 3 phase and not 7 phase and so on - it achieves the best balance given the technology we have
 
Why - many large industrial sites use 3.3kV motors and so on.

The voltage isn't fixed at 230 (or 110) - that's just the most suitable for most end users taking into account the factors.

Like why we use 3 phase and not 7 phase and so on - it achieves the best balance given the technology we have


Right, but 3.3kv with EPR insulation, stress cones and OCPDs to achieve rapid disconnection. The added cost and complexity would outdo any copper savings of using 3.3kv in residential and commercial.

400 volts on the other hand uses PVC insulation and at 230 volts to ground can use standard MCBs.
 
Right, but 3.3kv with EPR insulation, stress cones and OCPDs to achieve rapid disconnection. The added cost and complexity would outdo any copper savings of using 3.3kv in residential and commercial.

400 volts on the other hand uses PVC insulation and at 230 volts to ground can use standard MCBs.

but if you are going to start using phase to phase voltages, then you must start distributing 3 phase supplies - that's a two fold increase in the amount of copper used, plus all switchgear would be three phase etc.

That is a significant increase in costs - a 1.73 reduction in cable size balancing a 2 fold increase in the number of cables
 
but if you are going to start using phase to phase voltages, then you must start distributing 3 phase supplies - that's a two fold increase in the amount of copper used, plus all switchgear would be three phase etc.

That is a significant increase in costs - a 1.73 reduction in cable size balancing a 2 fold increase in the number of cables


No necessarily- you could drop two phases and an earth at each property.

100 x 230 =23,000va / 400 volts= 57.5 amps or 63 amp main fuse.

3 phase would give 33 amps per phase or a 35 amp main fuse.

In both cases the main would use thinner copper, and in the 3 phase example the number of wires do not change in that a 4th neutral is provided as is.
 
No necessarily- you could drop two phases and an earth at each property.

100 x 230 =23,000va / 400 volts= 57.5 amps or 63 amp main fuse.

3 phase would give 33 amps per phase or a 35 amp main fuse.

In both cases the main would use thinner copper, and in the 3 phase example the number of wires do not change in that a 4th neutral is provided as is.

In which case you cannot use 230V equipment!

it's only 400V in relation to a three phase circuit - each breaker is only operating at 230V if you use a single breaker then it must be 400V

All UK domestic equipment is 230v, switches etc

Yes SOME industrial kit is rated at 660V - but even that isn't sufficient, you would need 800v three phase kit for each breaker to open single phase 400V (700V but that's not standard)

A three phase set of breakers does not mean each is capable of opening 400V
 
Why - many large industrial sites use 3.3kV motors and so on.

The voltage isn't fixed at 230 (or 110) - that's just the most suitable for most end users taking into account the factors.

Like why we use 3 phase and not 7 phase and so on - it achieves the best balance given the technology we have
Sorry Julie disagree with your reasoning
 
Your reasoning shows no essence just random wording.

Well I thought it made sense!

It is still possible to use any voltage you want to suit your purpose, yes there are standards such as 230/400, or 380/660, or 1000v as per iec 60038.

However the 230/400 is most common purely because for the most part the current levels are manageable i.e cable sizes, the insulation needs are not onourous and most simple circuit breaker technologies can handle it.

That's why it has become the standard from all the options.

In the same way three phase makes the most sense - its more efficient than single or two phase, but also no less efficient than 4, 5,6,7.... phase.

Does that make it clearer?
[automerge]1600022035[/automerge]
It already exists.

There are lots of equipment that is single phase 400v - but its usually just in industrial settings, for example control transformers are usually phase to phase as there often isn't a neutral.

I took the op to mean why don't we use 400v across the board as standard rather than 230v
 
In which case you cannot use 230V equipment!

it's only 400V in relation to a three phase circuit - each breaker is only operating at 230V if you use a single breaker then it must be 400V

All UK domestic equipment is 230v, switches etc

Yes SOME industrial kit is rated at 660V - but even that isn't sufficient, you would need 800v three phase kit for each breaker to open single phase 400V (700V but that's not standard)

A three phase set of breakers does not mean each is capable of opening 400V

Right.

400 volt rated switches, sockets and light fittings.

Two and 3 pole breakers are already slash rated 230/400Y.
 

Reply to Practicality of 400 volt equipment in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock