Discuss Replacing old junction boxes with Wagos in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

T

Tim Brennan

Hi, Just recently qualified.
I've replaced some old 32amp junction boxes under the floor in my landing with Wago and Wago boxes to make them maintenance free prior to putting down new flooring.
Prior to doing this, i tested the ring continuity, r1 was 0.52 ohms, rn was 0.53 and r2 was 0.73, so was well within the 1.67 reg, now when i tested the ring once the work was complete the readings are: r1 0.47, rn 0.48 and r2 0.99 ohms. I have double checked all connections, but the r2 reading still seems a little high and doesn't meet the 1.67 guideline. I/R tests are fine. Maximum Zs is 0.54 ohms but that is on a dropdown spur to the lounge from the ring upstairs.
The reason i changed them was that there was no earth sleeving present and the terminals where not tight and could not be tightened.
I know the Wagos will introduce more resistance but just wanted to check what you guys thought.
Timmo.
 
Can you still get to your new connections to split the cpcs there and check continuity at that point.
 
Hi, Just recently qualified.
I've replaced some old 32amp junction boxes under the floor in my landing with Wago and Wago boxes to make them maintenance free prior to putting down new flooring.
Prior to doing this, i tested the ring continuity, r1 was 0.52 ohms, rn was 0.53 and r2 was 0.73, so was well within the 1.67 reg, now when i tested the ring once the work was complete the readings are: r1 0.47, rn 0.48 and r2 0.99 ohms. I have double checked all connections, but the r2 reading still seems a little high and doesn't meet the 1.67 guideline. I/R tests are fine. Maximum Zs is 0.54 ohms but that is on a dropdown spur to the lounge from the ring upstairs.
The reason i changed them was that there was no earth sleeving present and the terminals where not tight and could not be tightened.
I know the Wagos will introduce more resistance but just wanted to check what you guys thought.
Timmo.


The 1.67 is to give you a rough idea of what your r2 is likely to be if using 2.5/1.5mm2 cable. As long as your Zs is OK, don't worry.

Jay
 
oh sorry, what Jay said:
The 1.67 is to give you a rough idea of what your r2 is likely to be if using 2.5/1.5mm2 cable. As long as your Zs is OK, don't worry.

Jay
 
His R2 has increased by 0.26 since he reconnected why is this something not to worry about.
 
maybe where the old junction boxes had the cpc twisted together prior to being in the terminal made for a better connection than the wagos, there where 4 junction boxes replaced.
 
THeres a video on YouTube testing wago connectors for resistance and you'll be surprised at how little the resistance will change. Your meter may not even pick it up.
 
No the Wagos would not have caused this, me I would want to find it unless your original reading was incorrect because the R1 has gone down.
 
surely if the terminals were not tight on the line and neutral in the old junction boxes then the wagos would be a better contact and therefore the r1 + rn goes down by 0.05 ohm. As I said I have double checked all connections, i did replace about 2m of old cable with new, but im sure that wouldnt cause it.

Thanks again for the replies.
 
As said above, I wouldn't worry about it too much if the r1 and rn readings are the same and the r2 is a bit higher than expected especially if the Zs reading is well within it's limit for the protective device.

When the battery in my Fluke mft are low the leads don't always "zero" which increases readings. Als,o a good squeeze on the croc clips when testing can bring the reading down by 0.05 ohms. Other factors such as ambient temp etc may effect your test readings.
 

Reply to Replacing old junction boxes with Wagos in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi, I need to swap out a damaged 30A junction box on an existing ring main circuit and thought I'd replace it with Wago 221 connectors and a Wago...
Replies
3
Views
2K
Please advise what I should test / check next. My usual qualified electrician who did all of the work here is in Ireland for 4 weeks and not...
Replies
45
Views
3K
After fixing a few CPC related issues on a ring final I got the following results L-L = 0.47 N-N = 0.47 CPC-CPC = 0.69 R1+R2 Tested at 0.31...
Replies
3
Views
1K
I have been asked to change cu from old fuse board which has 6 fuses. Only 4 fuses are used. The first fuse feeds cooker circuit. This is not used...
Replies
17
Views
778
Ok. Can you cut a ring in half, add junction box, then run a spur off it? I thought it had to be from a socket? Mate of mine wanted me to see if...
Replies
3
Views
714

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock