This is second situation in as many weeks in which the supply is being moved around the building site and the DNO(s) are messing the customer around. This is another configuration that's going to get demolished in next few weeks, and a new supply head, meter and earth are going to get installed in what will be a newly built part of the house. So I see my responsibility here as being making the customer as safe as possible in this transition period. He's getting no help from the DNO on that. When I got there today to look at this PME the customer admitted the electrode had been dug up by the builders, and was sitting on the ground - my 22.8 Ohms reading probably reflected the fact that it's been p******g down for over 24 hours here, and site is a marsh.
All that aside... it's this VOELCB that's got me thinking. If the trip function doesn't work without separate external earth reference (my understanding of a VO-ELCB). So was the configuration safer as a TT system with a working VOELCB, or now as a TN-C-S without one - but with a nice low Zs value? I've still got the option of putting in a 100mA type S RCD, got a standalone here on my desk.