D
dayrider3883
I have installed a fan from the lighting switch to bathroom do i need to use a spur for the fan or can i go direct
both. this means fusing down before the light.But if it is a delayed fan where 2 live are used perminent and switch wire which one is fused down
Wouldn't comply with BS7671, as the whole circuit requires RCD protection, not just the part that enters the Bathroom.If the property hasn't got RCD protection, take the loop (before the light) into a FCU RCD, then out to the light, fan, etc. This way you can fuse down and have it all RCD protected. Nice and easy.
I think the regs should make an isolation switch for the fan mandatory!
Wouldn't comply with BS7671, as the whole circuit requires RCD protection, not just the part that enters the Bathroom.
but if you use the bathroom light switch to trigger the fan and the lighting is rcd protected and the fan is wired in 1.5 same as lighting then the lighting mcb should protect the fan wiring the fuseboard is next to the bathroom
Yes it's a common misconception, although I believe that it's deliberate attempt to circumvent the Regulations, as using an RCD FCU is often a lot easier than providing RCD protection for the whole circuit.Really. Live and learn, so in the case of a spur from a ring why can we get away with a RCD FCU then sockets. At least I've been adding RCD protection and isolation switching - unlike MANY I see around here!
Really. Live and learn, so in the case of a spur from a ring why can we get away with a RCD FCU then sockets. At least I've been adding RCD protection and isolation switching - unlike MANY I see around here!
You must ensure that the addition or alteration complies with BS7671.Good point, I thought you just had to make additions on older installations comply such as RCD sockets etc..and you were not obliged to upgrade the whole circuit?
You don't, you take one live to the fuse, and two lives from the fuse.but how can you take both lives into a 3 amp fuse
You don't, you take one live to the fuse, and two lives from the fuse.
Wherever RCDs are placed in a position other than at the origin of a circuit, there is danger that an earth fault between the origin of the circuit and the RCD will bypass the RCD.Back to my point, which is by using a FCU RCD and using this to supply the lights, fan and sometimes a shaver point the RCD is protecting all the circuits of the location i.e. in the said bathroom. PLUS there is a single point of isolation too.
There are too many homes around that don't have RCD's so IMHO my solution is certainly in the spirit of the regulation.
Got my Elecsa annual coming up so I might well ask him for his interpretation!
Yes it's a common misconception, although I believe that it's deliberate attempt to circumvent the Regulations, as using an RCD FCU is often a lot easier than providing RCD protection for the whole circuit.
701.411.3.3 Requires: "Aditional protection shall be provided for all circuits of the location, by the use of one or more RCDs having the characteristics specified in Regulation 415.1.1."
Which translated means all circuits supplying a location containing a bath or shower shall have 30mA RCD protection.
They've re-worded the Regulation in the amendment to only refer to LV circuits. We were hoping that this re-wording would have allowed the use of SELV equipment without the supply circuit having to be RCD protected, if the source of SELV was outside of the location. Unfortunately such is not the case. RCD protection is still required for the LV part of a SELV circuit, even though it will be as much use as a chocolate tea pot.
Appendix 15 whilst only being informative, indicates that circuits start and in the case of RFCs finish at DBs.My interpretation is that if you supply the bathroom lighting from an RCD FCU attached to the original lighting circuit then this creates a new circuit starting at the FCU as that is now the protective device for that circuit.
As it also incorporates an RCD then IMO it complies with all relevant regs.
According to BS7671, the origin of a circuit is not neccessarily at the overcurrent device.The origin of a circuit is at an overcurrent protective device. In this case that overcurrent protective device is the FCU.
Haven't you ever wondered why the regs give max Zs values for 3 and 13A BS 1362 fuses.
You are mistaking the origin of a circuit with the origin of an installation.
According to BS7671, the origin of a circuit is not neccessarily at the overcurrent device.
Regulations 433.2.2 434.2.1 indicate that devices can be installed along the run of a conductor, within 3m.
Whilst the definition of a circuit in Part 2: "Circuit. An assembly of electrical equipment supplied from the same origin and protected against overcurrent by the same protective device(s)."
Indicates that a circuit is protected by the same protective device, it does not indicate that the protective device is the origin of the circuit.
However the definition aside, the fact remains that Appendix 15 informs us that the origin of a circuit is at a DB, not at an FCU.
Wouldn't comply with BS7671, as the whole circuit requires RCD protection, not just the part that enters the Bathroom.
Carefull, you don't get splinters.i'm sitting on the fence on this one. both arguments hold water. maybe an adjudicator is required here. Widdler?
I am well aware that the definition of a circuit does not state that the protective device has to be at a DB.
I quoted the Definition to point out that a OPD is not considered to be the origin of a circuit.
Appendix 15 is not an example of typical socket-outlet circuits.
It sets out options for the design of ring and radial final circuits for houshold and similar premises in accordance with Regulation 433.1, using socket-outlets and fused connection units.
I accept that an FCU meets the requirements of an OPD as far as the definition of a circuit is concerned.
However the particular circuits we are discussing, are final circuits, and the requirements for final circuits are not just restricted to the definition of a circuit in Part 2 and those of Regulation 433.1.
Regulation 314.4 states: Where an installation comprises more than one final circuit, each final circuit shall be connected to a separate way in a distribution board. The wiring of each final circuit shall be electrically separate from that of every other final circuit, so as to prevent the indirect energizing of a final circuit intended to be isolated."
Now unles you are suggesting that the FCU, the light, the fan and associated wiring are not a final circuit, or that an FCU is a distribution board; how can having the origin of a circuit being an FCU meet the requirements of Regulation 314.4?
We are discussing 314.4.Regulation 314.4 isn't what we're discussing here. That is separation of final circuits.
Nowhere have I said that an FCU is a distribution board. The supply side of the FCU is connected to a final circuit that is fed from a distribution board.
What I'm saying is that the cable coming off the load side of an FCU is it's own circuit with the BS 1362 fuse as it's protective device.
Let me ask you this. On a schedule of test results what would you enter as the protective device for the lights and fan in the bathroom. You couldn't put the one at the distribution board as that is not the primary protective device for that wiring. Therefore you would have to enter it as a separate circuit and the protective device would be BS 1362.
You can do that ezzzekiel, but I would expect it to be noted as a departure on any certification, and I would further expect you to ensure that it provides the same degree of safety as would be achieved by compliance with the Regulations.Rcd fcu for your part of the works job done