OP
1shortcircuit
yeah well i know that working to one will/should demonstrate compliance with the other...but the point i was making is it will be the EAWR1989 that has the final say in court...not BS7671.....thats used to show compliance with EAWR.....
I beg to differ, it would be the Judge that has the final say
If a prosecutor appoints a person that can tie you up in knots with BS7671 then it probably wouldn't even get as far as EAWR as you would have had to have explained why you have NOT complied with these regs.
In my opinion, if someone knew that much about all of the Regs they wouldn't be on the tools. They would be getting paid very good money supporting prosecutors in court.
I still reckon anyone who wishes not to work to BS7671 is either, VERY intelligent or very silly :thumbsup