Are you a socialist now?![]()
No, but i can be for the purpose of this thread lol.
Trev, guess what...i've always voted conservative...
Tin hats...:leaving:
Are you a socialist now?![]()
No, but i can be for the purpose of this thread lol.
Trev, guess what...i've always voted conservative...
Tin hats...:leaving:
No, but i can be for the purpose of this thread lol.
Trev, guess what...i've always voted conservative...
Tin hats...:leaving:
last time i voted was for lord sutch, but since he died, i ain't bothered. if anything, i'd vote ukip. get out of europe.
Before she came to power I worked in a large engineering company as a Training Instructor charged with the selection, training and welfare of apprentice engineers - about 80 - 90 of them. The company had won the Queen's Award for Export Achievement, we had a full order book and overtime was worked 2 night and Saturday morning regularly.
We needed to expand and create more jobs so a new site was bought and work commenced on the construction of the new factory which was budgeted at £6Million. It was anticipated that 300 new jobs would be created on the opening of the new factory, with a further 300 at the end of the first year of opening.
Then Thatcher arrived and just before we were due to move to the new factory, redundancies were announced. Three years later we were all out of a job.
Today, that £6 Million custom- built engineering works is now a Cash & Carry warehouse.
You can guess my thoughts about Thatcher, and that's before I get started on the mines, shipyards, steelworks, and Shildon (google Shildon sometime) We have a dock here in Geordieland and it's called Tyne Dock. It was built to export coal from Geordieland to all parts of the world - including London. Today it imports coal from all over the world where it is sent by rail in wagons made in Romania and hauled by locomotives made in Canada to our power stations which are sitting on top of millions of tons of coal in Yorkshire, and all this while Shildon which was a major wagon manufacturing plant is a museum and the locomotive works at Darlington is an ASDA supermarket and Doncaster, Crewe and Loughborough are doing SFA.
What she could never get her head around was the fact that it was never "just" a mine, or "just" a steel works or just whatever .... it was ALSO about the infrastructure - all the other businesses and people who survived to serve the industries and the folk who worked in them whether it be the factories making the steel, the castings, the machinery to wagons to carry the products, the corner shops, the pubs & clubs and the breweries, bakers and candlestick makers - they all fell just like dominoes.
Her "policies" were all for a short-term fix and her replacements for the lost industries were / are finance & banking etc. and look where that led and that's before we even think about the privatisation of the energy, water and rail companies.
There's a joke doing the rounds just now that Thatcher's been dead for only a day and already Saint Nick has been to the Jobcentre to sign on and she's closed down 3 furnaces so far. It may be a joke, but I'm betting it isn't far from the truth!!
I have here a bottle of Newcastle Brown Ale that I'd like to pour on her grave - just after I've filtered it through my kidneys. The woman was pure evil personified.
Read the first few posts and thought to myself, these people clearly do not rememember what state this country was in before she was Voted in(3 times) Scargill was determined to bring her down and thru his own stupidity ruined the coal industry prematurely, i note he is now being chased for the house he says he owns. i also note he did not suffer alongside his 'brothers'. socialism does not work and never will, there always has to be someone at the top, getting more , earning more, more luxury, perks etc, how is that socialism or whatever else you want to call it. Most of the members on here i believe are self employed, i'm not, but i would vote for her rather than money grabbing blair or the arrogant brown who admitted that bringing in more immigrants would keep inflation down, and so it did, by increasing unemployment.If you do not know about the state of this country before she was voted in You do not know what you are talking about. This is my opinion ( in communist countries i would not be allowed to say it) and if my kids don't agree they can leave home and try life in north korea.
Iron Lady Rust In Peace ..............Fears of civil disorder in capital as plans are revealed for partially state-funded ceremonial funeral. Meanwhile lawyers warn against pre-emptive arrests as police scan social media to identify likely protesters
Anyone still thinking this is a free country and not a police state?
Do you also rememember the rubbish in the streets , the dead not buried, the 3 day week , the power cuts, inflation, and the unemployed under labour, clearly not, the unions ran this country NOT the government, She ran this country like you should run your household, within its means. you dont go and invite a lot of non paying guests to live with you if you can barely pay your bills. As for the falklands, she was strong when she needed to be, be honest did you actually think the argies would attack, i didnt, do you actually think n/korea will attack?. The utilities were sold off because as usual a labour government SPENT all the money in order to gain popularity, as they did this last time. And i think a lot of Ex council house tenants (now owners) would dissagree with you. I myself think the main utilities should have remained in the public domain ie gas electric and water they wre essentials and i think she was badly advised as she was on poll tax, the principle was right but the admin was wrong.I could also go on about the pointless strikes that bought this country to its knees, but i won't cos ive got work in the morningI clearly remember the poster proclaiming "Labour isn't working" with a queue forming in front of a job centre and the promise to reduce this. I clearly remember how unemployment went up and up and up. I clearly remember how communities were ripped apart and how families had their lives ruined by the policies of the government of the day. I clearly remember the refusal to invest in industry as other European countries did and see the effects of that to this day. I clearly remember how she was told that ships and troops should be stationed in the South Atlantic to deter an invasion of the Falklands and how that was refused thus leading to the deaths of 905 young men and the spending of £2 billion (which we were told we didn't have) in order for the party to ride the resultant wave of popularity to a second election victory which would almost certainly not have happened otherwise. I clearly remember how the utilities were sold off to the financial services industry resulting in us having water piped to us by foreign companies, being dependent on Russia for gas which is sold to us by a French company. I could go on but I won't, for now.
Didn't the 3 day week and power cuts start under the Heath government? Yes unemployment was high under labour but it went higher and higher under thatcher despite the promises to get it reduced (Guess the tories never change) You cannot run a country like you run a house, an economy does not work in the same way. Ex council tenants now homeowners may well disagree with me but that does not change the fact that their houses were sold to them at a knock down price as a bribe. Looking back I think it's fairly obvious that Argentina were going to attack especially when the one ship patrolling the area was withdrawn, she was even told that it would happen. As far as North Korea goes, well I don't know why that's relevant but I think an attack is distinctly possible. Yes strikes were crippling the country before she got in but you have to ask why were a lot of them happening? Probably because the man in the street was getting shafted by the Heath government and the subsequent labour administration was inept and impotent and so were condemned to firefighting rather than running the show. Nothing much improved from 1979 onwards and still hasn't to this dayDo you also rememember the rubbish in the streets , the dead not buried, the 3 day week , the power cuts, inflation, and the unemployed under labour, clearly not, the unions ran this country NOT the government, She ran this country like you should run your household, within its means. you dont go and invite a lot of non paying guests to live with you if you can barely pay your bills. As for the falklands, she was strong when she needed to be, be honest did you actually think the argies would attack, i didnt, do you actually think n/korea will attack?. The utilities were sold off because as usual a labour government SPENT all the money in order to gain popularity, as they did this last time. And i think a lot of Ex council house tenants (now owners) would dissagree with you. I myself think the main utilities should have remained in the public domain ie gas electric and water they wre essentials and i think she was badly advised as she was on poll tax, the principle was right but the admin was wrong.I could also go on about the pointless strikes that bought this country to its knees, but i won't cos ive got work in the morning
True , but then they started to get stupid, in the 60's and 70's they would strike for the most stupid things. as for the needs of the 'majority ' they clearly didnt think of the majority when they put the country on a three day week and the power cuts etc, i suffered under those conditions and so did the majority in this country, and for what.The unions are the only thing that bought about safe working practices in this country. As for "there always has to be someone at the top, getting more , earning more, more luxury, perks etc" that has to be balanced out by the needs of the majority other wise you may as well just go back to feudalism or slavery.
I just PMd Marvo telling him he's banned for 2 weeks for starting this one!!![]()
yes it was the heath administration, but it was the NUM under scargill that bought this about, that man thought he was invincible, as i said 'the unions ran this country' not the governments of the time, neither labour nor conservative could control them, the country was a mess.Why can't you run a country the same as a household, it simple economics, you don't spend more than is coming in, otherwise you get in debt, which is where we are now, in debt. This government has spent its time trying to cut back the wastefull spending of the last labour government, and so it has always been and probably will be again. slowly but surely our standard of living improves,just look around your own house/flat.tbc.Didn't the 3 day week and power cuts start under the Heath government? Yes unemployment was high under labour but it went higher and higher under thatcher despite the promises to get it reduced (Guess the tories never change) You cannot run a country like you run a house, an economy does not work in the same way. Ex council tenants now homeowners may well disagree with me but that does not change the fact that their houses were sold to them at a knock down price as a bribe. Looking back I think it's fairly obvious that Argentina were going to attack especially when the one ship patrolling the area was withdrawn, she was even told that it would happen. As far as North Korea goes, well I don't know why that's relevant but I think an attack is distinctly possible. Yes strikes were crippling the country before she got in but you have to ask why were a lot of them happening? Probably because the man in the street was getting shafted by the Heath government and the subsequent labour administration was inept and impotent and so were condemned to firefighting rather than running the show. Nothing much improved from 1979 onwards and still hasn't to this day
- 1. She supported the retention of capital punishment
2. She destroyed the country's manufacturing industry
3. She voted against the relaxation of divorce laws
4. She abolished free milk for schoolchildren
5. She supported more freedom for business (and look how that turned out)
6. She gained support from the National Front in the 1979 election by pandering to the fears of immigration
7. She gerrymandered local authorities by forcing through council house sales, at the same time preventing councils from spending the money they got for selling houses on building new houses (spending on social housing dropped by 67% in her premiership)
8. She was responsible for 3.6 million unemployed - the highest figure and the highest proportion of the workforce in history and three times the previous government. Massaging of the figures means that the figure was closer to 5 million
9. She ignored intelligence about Argentinian preparations for the invasion of the Falkland Islands and scrapped the only Royal Navy presence in the islands
10. The poll tax
11. She presided over the closure of 150 coal mines; we are now crippled by the cost of energy, having to import expensive coal from abroad
12. She compared her "fight" against the miners to the Falklands War
13. She privatised state monopolies and created the corporate greed culture that we've been railing against for the last 5 years
14. She introduced the gradual privatisation of the NHS
15. She introduced financial deregulation in a way that turned city institutions into avaricious money pits
16. She pioneered the unfailing adoration and unquestioning support of the USA
17. She allowed the US to place nuclear missiles on UK soil, under US control
18. Section 28
19. She opposed anti-apartheid sanctions against South Africa and described Nelson Mandela as "that grubby little terrorist"
20. She support the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and sent the SAS to train their soldiers
21. She allowed the US to bomb Libya in 1986, against the wishes of more than 2/3 of the population
22. She opposed the reunification of Germany
23. She invented Quangos
24. She increased VAT from 8% to 17.5%
25. She had the lowest approval rating of any post-war Prime Minister
26. Her post-PM job? Consultant to Philip Morris tobacco at $250,000 a year, plus $50,000 per speech
27. The Al Yamamah contract
28. She opposed the indictment of Chile's General Pinochet
29. Social unrest under her leadership was higher than at any time since the General Strike
30. She presided over interest rates increasing to 15%
31. BSE
32. She presided over 2 million manufacturing job losses in the 79-81 recession
33. She opposed the inclusion of Eire in the Northern Ireland peace process
34. She supported sanctions-busting arms deals with South Africa
35. Cecil Parkinson, Alan Clark, David Mellor, Jeffrey Archer, Jonathan Aitkin
36. Crime rates doubled under Thatcher
37. Black Wednesday – Britain withdraws from the ERM and the pound is devalued. Cost to Britain - £3.5 billion; profit for George Soros - £1 billion
38. Poverty doubled while she opposed a minimum wage
39. She privatised public services, claiming at the time it would increase public ownership. Most are now owned either by foreign governments (EDF) or major investment houses. The profits don’t now accrue to the taxpayer, but to foreign or institutional shareholders.
40. She cut 75% of funding to museums, galleries and other sources of education
41. In the Thatcher years the top 10% of earners received almost 50% of the tax remissions
42. 21.9% inflation
I don't think he was objecting to the massaging of the numbers quite so much as the other content of point 88. She was responsible for 3.6 million unemployed - the highest figure and the highest proportion of the workforce in history and three times the previous government. Massaging of the figures means that the figure was closer to 5 million
Are you telling me that no labour government hasn't massaged the figures
well, she was the only one that had the guts to liberate the falklands. admittedly, not much use to us back here.
If thats true why wasn't it printed in the papers, i feel sure some or all of the leftie press would have grabbed that and it would have been broadcast far and wideMany years ago I was seeing a lass who was studying politics in Uni. She told me that Maggie's popularity was flagging so she told the Argentine prime minister that she wasn't bothered about the Falklands. He moves his army in and then Maggie complains. He can't move them out without losing face so a war starts. Us brits win (of course) and Maggie gets elected again.
If its true then a lot of guys died just cause of a politicians lie... They would never do that would they.... (we really need a sarcastic font)
If thats true why wasn't it printed in the papers, i feel sure some or all of the leftie press would have grabbed that and it would have been broadcast far and wide
A newspaper that lends itself to left wing politics rather than print an unbiased view of the facts. Hope this helpsLeftie Press? whats that then?
Leftie Press? whats that then?
A newspaper that lends itself to left wing politics rather than print an unbiased view of the facts. Hope this helps
You just named one ie the Morning Star,and of course the Mirror, The Guardian is centre left and the Observer centre left +The independant is centre leftName one which is well known :earmuffs: and name a newspaper which doesn't promote right wing politics with the exception of the morning star and the mirror.
The Guardian.Name one which is well known :earmuffs: and name a newspaper which doesn't promote right wing politics with the exception of the morning star and the mirror.