13amp FCU off ring main supplying sockets in shed.
Zs at furthest socket in shed is 1.26ohms which is too high for a 32 amp mcb.
Would you use the 13amp fuse in the FCU to meet your Zs reading?
Zs at FCU is 0.70.
 
I understand your logic i.e. what's the difference between have a socket with a 13A extension reel going into vs a FCU with 13A fuse and long "extension" out to garage.

However difference is fixed vs non-fixed wiring. For fixed wiring then I think you already know the answer. So I would personally be looking to (depending on cost and longer term plans):

1. increase size of cable from FCU to sockets in garage, to reduce Zs to within acceptable limits.
2. or run a separate circuit for the CU to the garage with acceptable Zs for that circuit.

I know it's not ideal, but keeps you right.
 
13amp FCU off ring main supplying sockets in shed.
Zs at furthest socket in shed is 1.26ohms which is too high for a 32 amp mcb.
Would you use the 13amp fuse in the FCU to meet your Zs reading?
Zs at FCU is 0.70.

It is protected by the 13A fuse so needs to meet the Zs requirement for the 13A fuse.
[automerge]1592384713[/automerge]
I understand your logic i.e. what's the difference between have a socket with a 13A extension reel going into vs a FCU with 13A fuse and long "extension" out to garage.

However difference is fixed vs non-fixed wiring. For fixed wiring then I think you already know the answer. So I would personally be looking to (depending on cost and longer term plans):

1. increase size of cable from FCU to sockets in garage, to reduce Zs to within acceptable limits.
2. or run a separate circuit for the CU to the garage with acceptable Zs for that circuit.

I know it's not ideal, but keeps you right.

It is protected by the 13A fuse so it is fully compliant and nothing needs to be done.
 
Cheers @davesparks Guess I'm belt and braces type of guy. :oops:Always thinking worst case and looking at potential changes down the line....

What worst case are you looking at here?
And what potential change?

We cannot protect against potential changes down the line because we cannot know for certain what will, or will not happen in the future.
 
What worst case are you looking at here?
And what potential change?

We cannot protect against potential changes down the line because we cannot know for certain what will, or will not happen in the future.
Agree with you fully :)

Definitely can't see into the future, just what I've seen happen over the years, always plays at the back on my mind e.g. FCUs swapped out for sockets, fuses in FCU replaced by screws/wire.

No matter what we try to protect against (perceived or real) something will always be missed, hence evolution of the regs over the years.

Hope that makes sense? Apologies if I've inadvertently offend you, certainly was not my intention.
 
Definitely can't see into the future, just what I've seen happen over the years, always plays at the back on my mind e.g. FCUs swapped out for sockets, fuses in FCU replaced by screws/wire.

Whilst those things can and do happen it is still very hard to protect against them now, and certainly unfair to charge a customer for extra work to protect against something they, or a future owner of a property might do.
 
If it's 30ma RCD protected at the origin of the final circuit the maximum permitted Zs is 1667 ohms. If it's not, it's supplying sockets, why isnt it?

Need to be a little bit careful when applying this.
Yeah, this method then moves the job of earth fault protection from the OCPD to the RCD as the fault current is not enough to operate the OCPD quickly enough. The OCPD will still be covering short circuit protection so this then needs to be checked. If cpc is reduced size then probably ok as the fault current will be higher across live conductors, but you will still need to verify this is satisfactory. If you have situation where cpc is same size as live conductors and it wont satisfy Zs then it also won't satisfy live conductor thermal constraints either as will be the same fault current.
[automerge]1592523436[/automerge]
Agree with you fully :)

Definitely can't see into the future, just what I've seen happen over the years, always plays at the back on my mind e.g. FCUs swapped out for sockets, fuses in FCU replaced by screws/wire.

No matter what we try to protect against (perceived or real) something will always be missed, hence evolution of the regs over the years.

Hope that makes sense? Apologies if I've inadvertently offend you, certainly was not my intention.

Seriously mate, I would not worry about what other people do in the future. If they make changes to an electrical installation then they are responsible for them.
 
Need to be a little bit careful when applying this.
Yeah, this method then moves the job of earth fault protection from the OCPD to the RCD as the fault current is not enough to operate the OCPD quickly enough. The OCPD will still be covering short circuit protection so this then needs to be checked. If cpc is reduced size then probably ok as the fault current will be higher across live conductors, but you will still need to verify this is satisfactory. If you have situation where cpc is same size as live conductors and it wont satisfy Zs then it also won't satisfy live conductor thermal constraints either as will be the same fault current.
[automerge]1592523436[/automerge]


Seriously mate, I would not worry about what other people do in the future. If they make changes to an electrical installation then they are responsible for them.
To add , the live conductors need checking against the formula T= K2 S2/I2 , the resulting number is how long it takes for damage to the live conductors to occur, nothing to do with whether the earth fault loop impedance complies or not.
The short circuit fault loop can be measured and checked against the time characteristics of the ocpd, the given number in seconds for disconnection can then be compared to the formula above to see if the live conductors are thermally protected against short circuit faults.
I think this is what was implied?
 
Last edited:
Need to be a little bit careful when applying this.
Yeah, this method then moves the job of earth fault protection from the OCPD to the RCD as the fault current is not enough to operate the OCPD quickly enough. The OCPD will still be covering short circuit protection so this then needs to be checked. If cpc is reduced size then probably ok as the fault current will be higher across live conductors, but you will still need to verify this is satisfactory. If you have situation where cpc is same size as live conductors and it wont satisfy Zs then it also won't satisfy live conductor thermal constraints either as will be the same fault current.
[automerge]1592523436[/automerge]


Seriously mate, I would not worry about what other people do in the future. If they make changes to an electrical installation then they are responsible for them.
Great point.

Unfortunately the 'other' people are friends and family at the moment, and I'm sure you know what they are like...I have stopped recommending they employ armed security to prevent them touching anything electrical in the house. Now I recommend they just employ a butler to flick their switches for them. Problem solved. ;)

On a more serious note, also need to make sure I reference the regs more often rather than relaying on the old brain matter, before jumping in with my comments.

Lesson(s) learned. Thanks to all.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
London
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Trainee Electrician

Thread Information

Title
High Zs
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
18
Unsolved
--

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Bailey326,
Last reply from
Let me think,
Replies
18
Views
3,642

Advert

Back
Top