B

Berneray

Quick question.

Potential customer of mine was given the old SAP2009 calculation by another
company.

When I questioned this they told here its okay to do this as long as they tell
the customer the method they are using.

I know a projection is just a projection but in this case their's comes out 243
kilowatts a year better than SAP 2009.

Is this right.
 
Don't think so. There was a period (maybe three months) when both systems were acceptable. Then SAP2009 was phased out and the new MCS calculation method was obligatory.
 
You can use as many methods as you like as long as you provide an estimate using new MCS method and do not give greater prominence to alternatives.

We state this in our reports and quotations. We go on to tell the customer that in many instances the MCS method is pants and why. The MCS output estimate is provided first followed by our one based on PVsol and PVGIS-SAF.

Did one recently where MCS method was understating by 23%!!! I could empirically show our estimate is correct as I have an array on a property not far away that produces at a higher output.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
MCS May 2013 Guidelines
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Solar PV Forum | Solar Panels Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
3

Thread Tags

Tags Tags
guide mcs

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Berneray,
Last reply from
The Solar King,
Replies
3
Views
1,235

Advert

Back
Top