Squeezing the last Drop

[MJPD29]

After reading this and previous posts you have made, I can only presume you are a flat earther.

 

[justcurioustwo]

After reading this and previous posts you have made, I can only presume you are a flat earther.

only if you say so

 

[justcurioustwo]

Of which, both sound and heat are largely a result of friction (and a tiny bit of arcing). You could feasibly trap some of the heat by some kind of exchanger and feasibly use some of the air pressure from the noise to drive a diaphragm but all you will ultimately do is create yet more losses downstream in processing that kinetic energy. Newton had this figured out centuries ago - Every action has an EQUAL and opposite reaction. So whilst I applaud you for a drive in efficiency I’d suggest spending your time working on lubricants and bearings rather than this?

You are contradicting yourself. Every action does not have an equal and opposite reaction. There is some loss in every action.

 

[DPG]

You are contradicting yourself. Every action does not have an equal and opposite reaction. There is some loss in every action.

Rockingit is correct in what he says.

 

[Diddy]

There is some loss in every action.

There you go there is loss. Now every aspect of science even so called settled science is and should always be challenged. The challenge here is how to efficiently recover those losses while not spending more time/money/energy than it would to just "accept" those losses.

Edit to add - the total energy output including losses proves Rockingit and some other mad scientist from a while back are indeed correct "every action......."

 

[nicebutdim]

You are contradicting yourself. Every action does not have an equal and opposite reaction. There is some loss in every action.

Those 'losses' are part of the equal and opposite reaction.

 

[justcurioustwo]

The numbers are were

 

[justcurioustwo]

Rockingit is correct in what he says.

In the theoretical world, Yes
In the real world, No

 

[Jim_e_Jib]

View attachment 104020
The numbers are were

Is it essential that this apparatus be submerged in sea water?

Here in the UK, we have Loch Ness in Scotland. At 744ft, it's plenty deep enough, with the added benefit of a wee beastie in residence who could give you a hand cranking the handle of the air compressor.

 

[littlespark]

This thread didn’t start off with this undersea contraption….

If only we could harness the power of off-topic tangents.

 

[James]

Or indeed any other kind of bovine excrement

 

[DPG]

View attachment 104020
The numbers are were

You have already posted that on another thread and had plenty of feedback. No point just going off on tangents.

 

[brianmoooore]

Or indeed any other kind of bovine excrement

I know of a couple of places that do just that.