Rather High Ze with all the bonding in place

[Deleted member 26818]

I've looked back over the thread and can find no reference to Chris day giving any definition of Zs or even implying a Zs was carried out.

I'm sure Chris knows exactly what Ze and Zs are.

Perhaps some spectacles would be in order?
Your correct, instead of referring to Ze and Zs, he used Ze without bonding connected and Ze with bonding connected.

 

[Deleted account]

Post 7
With the bonding disconnected 3.25Ohms Ze

Is that incorrect?
I still cannot find any mention to Zs.

 

[Deleted member 26818]

I still cannot find any mention to Zs.

Exactly.

 

[Deleted account]

Exactly.

Pleased you agree

 

[Deleted member 26818]

Pleased you agree

The reason there is mention of Zs, is because the OP describes it as being Ze with bonding in place.

 

[Deleted account]

Last input on this thread from me

Post 19 Chris mentions bonding out of interest only.

We all read and interpret things differently. This is my interpretation.

Please agree to disagree.

 

[Deleted member 26818]

Last input on this thread from me

Post 19 Chris mentions bonding out of interest only.

We all read and interpret things differently. This is my interpretation.

Please agree to disagree.

Not 100% sure what you’re going on about or what it is you disagree with.
Simple question: What is the title of this thread.
More complicated question: What if anything do you understand Ze to be?