G
GBDamo
Hubris is ultimately what being educated at the best schools, colleges and universities produces.
People with unshakable drive, enthusiasm and ability to skip from catastrophe to the next with no loss of self confidence.
Not wishing to go off on another tangent, but having worked under various mangers in a largest organisation, those attributes some of them had.
But some of them had additional not so pleasant attributes, such as arrogance, aberrant behaviour, infallible, selfish and immoral standards but judgemental of others. Quite frankly, unpleasant individuals, in charge of others.
G
GBDamo
Its what soulless mega corps want.
N
nicebutdim
There's an incredible amount of effort being expended in pursuing every possible avenue against him.
Thats cos he's a
The rats are leaving the sinking ship.
Edit; sorry thats a slanderous statement.
Last edited:
G
GBDamo
You think they'd have found something by now.
Expect more of these noise "investigations" that deliver nothing but still the media will blather on about the twice impeached and constantly under investigation former president.
Either the Democrats employ the worlds worst investigators or these are witch hunts.
But I know you don't like him so I guess that makes it all good?
The investigations into Trump's businesses are nothing to do with the Democrats or the press and nothing to do with a witch hunt.
Trump and his businesses have been in and out of court for years, he thrives on it.
The cases being resurrected now are ones that were held off due to the election, bit of a privledge there.
Can't imagine a Court holding off a case for anyone else.
Here's why a group of tennants in a block of 138 units, are suing,
Ms. Green is among a group of tenants in rent-regulated apartments once owned by Mr. Trump’s father who have filed a lawsuit against the president and his siblings, accusing the Trumps of a decade-long fraud to win artificially high rent increases through an invoice-padding scheme.
The scheme, first revealed in a 2018 investigation by The New York Times, involved tacking at least 20 percent onto the cost of materials purchased for the apartments, with Mr. Trump, his siblings and a cousin splitting the extra proceeds. The maneuver generated millions of dollars for each sibling, with no work required. While the siblings were still liable for income taxes, the maneuver allowed them to evade far-higher gift and estate taxes on part of the fortune they received from their father.
Trump and his businesses have been in and out of court for years, he thrives on it.
The cases being resurrected now are ones that were held off due to the election, bit of a privledge there.
Can't imagine a Court holding off a case for anyone else.
Here's why a group of tennants in a block of 138 units, are suing,
Ms. Green is among a group of tenants in rent-regulated apartments once owned by Mr. Trump’s father who have filed a lawsuit against the president and his siblings, accusing the Trumps of a decade-long fraud to win artificially high rent increases through an invoice-padding scheme.
The scheme, first revealed in a 2018 investigation by The New York Times, involved tacking at least 20 percent onto the cost of materials purchased for the apartments, with Mr. Trump, his siblings and a cousin splitting the extra proceeds. The maneuver generated millions of dollars for each sibling, with no work required. While the siblings were still liable for income taxes, the maneuver allowed them to evade far-higher gift and estate taxes on part of the fortune they received from their father.
Last edited:
G
GBDamo
All big businesses are in and out of court, success is dependent on sailing as close to the wind as possible, sometimes crossing it.
When a tax code runs into volumes anyone can and will fall foul of it.
Who and what to prosecute at this level is entirely political.
Still no Burisma investigation yet?
D
Darkwood
Biden repeatedly questioned in the election run up whether if president he would stack the supreme court, a method constitutionally frowned on and a clear move that is made to rig the legal system.
At every step he either refused to answer or made unclear comments.
BIden is now president, already making large steps to stack the courts... you would only do this for political reasons to subvert the law to favour any trial that you needed to.
Biden puts questionable people in charge of the system that is going to see his son been prosecuted over the Burisma saga and child ---- images.
Anyone seeing the links yet, his son found to have been in receipt of briberies and child ----, some of the evidence linked the President too, if he can destroy the case against his son then he can also get a home free run himself.
Talk about been the Judge and the Jury on your own son's case.. meanwhile just released is an interview that exposes child abuse throughout the deep state including many figures mentioned in this thread already.
The USA is a mess, the media are political zombies, big tech is crushing conservative opinions, court systems are rigged and 3 months later even under court orders States are still refusing to hand over ballots and machines for audit....OH and btw Biden has signed EO's that can bring in new laws that allow the audits of the ballots to be blocked legally and for the illegal votes that judges has recently announced were in fact illegal can now be counted.
I don't care what side of the coin you sit here but you have to admit that this is corrupt throughout and people wonder why half the country is peed off.
Trump in his 4 yr term never once stacked the courts or brought in laws to subvert the results of ongoing trials, imagine if he had and the outrage yet Biden does it and no news coverage.
All I ask here is those who don't believe the election was rigged then answer 1 simple question, why won't they hand the Ballots over, this would have proven they were legitimate as they claimed 3months ago and Trump would of accepted it, 3 months later and still refuse to release them - WHY ?.. a definite way to prove it wasn't rigged... or the only way to show it was..actions and words here, actions speak louder.
At every step he either refused to answer or made unclear comments.
BIden is now president, already making large steps to stack the courts... you would only do this for political reasons to subvert the law to favour any trial that you needed to.
Biden puts questionable people in charge of the system that is going to see his son been prosecuted over the Burisma saga and child ---- images.
Anyone seeing the links yet, his son found to have been in receipt of briberies and child ----, some of the evidence linked the President too, if he can destroy the case against his son then he can also get a home free run himself.
Talk about been the Judge and the Jury on your own son's case.. meanwhile just released is an interview that exposes child abuse throughout the deep state including many figures mentioned in this thread already.
The USA is a mess, the media are political zombies, big tech is crushing conservative opinions, court systems are rigged and 3 months later even under court orders States are still refusing to hand over ballots and machines for audit....OH and btw Biden has signed EO's that can bring in new laws that allow the audits of the ballots to be blocked legally and for the illegal votes that judges has recently announced were in fact illegal can now be counted.
I don't care what side of the coin you sit here but you have to admit that this is corrupt throughout and people wonder why half the country is peed off.
Trump in his 4 yr term never once stacked the courts or brought in laws to subvert the results of ongoing trials, imagine if he had and the outrage yet Biden does it and no news coverage.
All I ask here is those who don't believe the election was rigged then answer 1 simple question, why won't they hand the Ballots over, this would have proven they were legitimate as they claimed 3months ago and Trump would of accepted it, 3 months later and still refuse to release them - WHY ?.. a definite way to prove it wasn't rigged... or the only way to show it was..actions and words here, actions speak louder.
It may not be defined as stacking, but Trump rushing through the appointment of Coney Barratt in record time to beef up the majority the Republicans already had was an insurance policy for him incase he needed the Supreme Court, was that not outrageous?
Fortunately Justice won out as it most likely would if the Court had a Democrat majority and the Supreme Court ruled against Trump.
D
Darkwood
The US politics like I have mentioned before is not like ours, there are many political prisoners caught in weighted legal decisions and it is common for any leaving president to reset the system so to say.
Trump granted clemency (pardon) to 143 people mostly caught up in political games and a corrupt judicial system that was weighted in the Dem's favour.. he actually was very selective and careful who he pardoned given the scrutiny he was under and his choices were not a surprise or any real scandal.
In reflection obama gave clemency to over 1900 people and there was many questionable decisions but the media are not really bothered scrutinising Obama as they are all part of the same Deep State system.
The fact the media spent little time of the list of Trump Pardons shows there wasn't any real shockers or scandalous choices.
Trump granted clemency (pardon) to 143 people mostly caught up in political games and a corrupt judicial system that was weighted in the Dem's favour.. he actually was very selective and careful who he pardoned given the scrutiny he was under and his choices were not a surprise or any real scandal.
In reflection obama gave clemency to over 1900 people and there was many questionable decisions but the media are not really bothered scrutinising Obama as they are all part of the same Deep State system.
The fact the media spent little time of the list of Trump Pardons shows there wasn't any real shockers or scandalous choices.
N
nicebutdim
It's common for departing presidents to issue pardons.
You might want to look at the pardons issued by Trump and several of his predecessors.
Edit: Note to self - read all new posts before responding.
Thought you were gonna say that ?. This thread just seems to be one rule for whichever side you are on and one rule for the other. I'm not saying that the Democrats are much better but I know what I've seen and heard with my own eyes and ears over the last 4 years and that's enough for me to form my own opinion.
D
Darkwood
What trump did was by the book, he also rebalanced some of the system but never stacked it, what Biden is attempting to do is against what the constitution was designed to do, it is one of the main reasons the constitution was drafted to stop what Biden is trying to do, this is why he refused to mention or answer it in the election run ups, Americans hold their constitution very dear and he would throw away his chances by saying he was going to stack the courts.
Now he is in is he is setting the ball rolling to do exactly that, and it is upsetting not only the opposition but many of the democrats. This is taking the US into what can only be called communism.
Just look at what is occurring -
Silence the opposition and suppress the public freedom of speech (Parler removed, Trump removed and thousands of account closed on twitter almost all on the conservative side)
Take political control of the courts (Biden is doing that)
Those that question and oppose be arrested even for speech or posts (man arrested for a meme he posted against hillary 4 yrs ago).
It is now becoming apparent the national guard is there to protect Biden/demcrats not from Trump fans but from everyone, his actions have not just upset republicans who I may add are not rioting over it but he has upset BLM and Antifa and thousands who have had their jobs destroyed on EO's he siged, since the inauguration Antifa have been rioting and trashing democrat buildings across the country as they realise they have been used as political pawns and now they have been let down by democrat promises they are back to violence and protests... bet you haven't even heard that in the news have you.
D
Darkwood
And you are welcome t have and share those opinions as is how we normally refine our look on life, all I ask is when you say you know what seen and heard may I ask are we talking through the media because that is the worst place to get a real view.
Like I said earlier, I prefer to watch professional law experts give feedback on events and legal cases, it very rarely matches what you see from the media and in fact it's a massive eye opener to how biased all media is and that is on both side of the spectrum not just one.
A good starting point and a guy who simplifies and explains the legal jargon is Viva Frei, he is on a few platforms but you'll find him doing almost daily uploads in youtube.
Have a gander at the parler/amazon review and witness how the judge made a 'political' decision in Amazon's favour completely exposing how the system is been manipulated to take out the conservative voice and any company that tries to oppose it.
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm just a simple fella darkwood and I just don't like the tone of lots of words I've actually seen him say over the years. It's just the way I roll in life but I absolutely respect what you are saying,you are way more knowledgeable about this than me. I've just always had this aversion to the brash almost mocking tone that he seems to be an exponent of. It takes all sorts to make a world though and I know I'm taking a simplistic view of this so I'll just shut up now lol ?
D
Darkwood
I agree @Paul L and for the first few yrs I was 100% behind your school of thought then I started seeing what his policies and actions were doing for the US and never saw these positive stories ever on the news so I dug deeper and it totally opened up a massive can of worms and then I realised that not only the US media but our own was unfairly targeting Trump by only posting negative stories.
Yes he is a verbal idiot, yes he doesn't carry himself like a real politician but he did one thing no recent president has done, he put the people before the big tech and that is why he beat employment records, economy records, got more blacks into education than any other president etc ..
If he was this person that we are told then why do 80million people still support him after he has left and why do all the figures he achieved destroy all recent achievements by any other president.
That was the reason I posted that achievement list, non of my mates had ever even known of any of them and given he helped broker 4 peace deals that other presidents had failed to do you have to ask a lot of questions as to why we are been spoon fed nothing but negatives.
The same mates of mine didn't even know there is corruption and pedo allegations against Hunter Biden or the sexual allegation against his dad 'the President' these cases are active yet it now seems Biden is setting the cases up to fail. Trump could have done this with the Russia allegations but he didn't need to because he wasn't guilty and was cleared but only after yrs of claims.
If you want to stick by your views I will think no less of you as that is your right but I do like to show there is 2 sides to every story and US politics is by far one complicated cookie.
Yes he is a verbal idiot, yes he doesn't carry himself like a real politician but he did one thing no recent president has done, he put the people before the big tech and that is why he beat employment records, economy records, got more blacks into education than any other president etc ..
If he was this person that we are told then why do 80million people still support him after he has left and why do all the figures he achieved destroy all recent achievements by any other president.
That was the reason I posted that achievement list, non of my mates had ever even known of any of them and given he helped broker 4 peace deals that other presidents had failed to do you have to ask a lot of questions as to why we are been spoon fed nothing but negatives.
The same mates of mine didn't even know there is corruption and pedo allegations against Hunter Biden or the sexual allegation against his dad 'the President' these cases are active yet it now seems Biden is setting the cases up to fail. Trump could have done this with the Russia allegations but he didn't need to because he wasn't guilty and was cleared but only after yrs of claims.
If you want to stick by your views I will think no less of you as that is your right but I do like to show there is 2 sides to every story and US politics is by far one complicated cookie.
N
nicebutdim
Oddly enough I was also opposed to Trump when he won the presidency, although I felt the choice between him and Hillary was pretty much impossible for Americans. I thought US politics needed a kick up the backside, and that he would provide this, but I didn't expect him to do much for US citizens.
He certainly provided a shake up and his continued brash attitude came as no surprise, but I started to realise that his policies were actually having an effect on the lives of many of those Americans to whom no one listened.
As the Russian allegations started to look shakey and it became apparent that many of his opponents weren't interested in any of his successes, but simply wanted to oppose his every action, I began to watch more closely.
After four years he was still the same braggart, but that side of his personality was no longer as brash as it had been - not that I think he was a different person, but that he'd learnt a little about politics. While the last four years saw a lot of anger, this was often about nothing of substance. Right now I think we're going to see much of the same anger, but possibly for good reason - who know? This might all blow over and everything goes back to the old routine, but equally matters could become worse. One thing I've long been certain of is that Biden isn't going to do much other than what he is told by persons unknown - it's pretty clear that he isn't capable, so who is writing these executive orders?
It's also interesting to note that where antifa rioters were previously being released without bail, for all but the most serious of charges, they're now facing much more robust charges and are less likely to be released after processing. These decisions are being taken at a mayoral level as before, yet those roles are still occupied by the same people.
Now matter what anyone's politcal views are, I think events in the US are worth keeping a close eye on.
He certainly provided a shake up and his continued brash attitude came as no surprise, but I started to realise that his policies were actually having an effect on the lives of many of those Americans to whom no one listened.
As the Russian allegations started to look shakey and it became apparent that many of his opponents weren't interested in any of his successes, but simply wanted to oppose his every action, I began to watch more closely.
After four years he was still the same braggart, but that side of his personality was no longer as brash as it had been - not that I think he was a different person, but that he'd learnt a little about politics. While the last four years saw a lot of anger, this was often about nothing of substance. Right now I think we're going to see much of the same anger, but possibly for good reason - who know? This might all blow over and everything goes back to the old routine, but equally matters could become worse. One thing I've long been certain of is that Biden isn't going to do much other than what he is told by persons unknown - it's pretty clear that he isn't capable, so who is writing these executive orders?
It's also interesting to note that where antifa rioters were previously being released without bail, for all but the most serious of charges, they're now facing much more robust charges and are less likely to be released after processing. These decisions are being taken at a mayoral level as before, yet those roles are still occupied by the same people.
Now matter what anyone's politcal views are, I think events in the US are worth keeping a close eye on.
I'm happy to correct my earlier inference regarding Trumps pardoning of people. I now note that all previous presidents of both parties have always done this and Barak Obama had the highest amount i believe. I should have looked into that a bit more (maybe proving your points about finding out correct information).
I will never be a fan of Trumps for my simplistic reasoning previously stated but i cant blame him for everything. Have a good day ?.
I will never be a fan of Trumps for my simplistic reasoning previously stated but i cant blame him for everything. Have a good day ?.
I‘ve just Googled that, most of the hits suggest they are false allegations. Where do you get your information from?
N
nicebutdim
Some of the allegations surrounding Hunter Biden are difficult to substantiate for legal reasons (images involving kids). Apparently some non-explicit images have been circulated that have been described as vile and indefensible. It is alleged that these are the tip of that particular iceberg, but I've no desire to view them for obvious reasons.
The corruption allegations stem from emails released after a computer repairer handed a laptop to US authorites (non payment of repair bill by Hunter Biden meant that laptop subsequently passed into ownership of the repairer). This story broke, along with some leaked emails, prior to the election and main stream media reported nothing. One notable exception was the New York Post, whose Twitter account was locked due to claims over Authenticity of these emails. NY Post refused to back down and their account was finally unlocked (several days) after authenticity was confirmed. After the election, some noises were made about the story within the main stream media, but ultimately they dropped the whole thing.
The emails implicate Hunter and also Joe Biden's brother. What hasn't been substantiated is the claim that a party regularly referred to as "the big man" is none other than Joe Biden, although a former business partner of Hunter's has gone on record stating that Joe Biden was always to be referred to by this name in all communications.
Who knows what the actual truth is, but I find it rather odd that this story involving authenticated information has been mostly ignored by the media.
N
nicebutdim
I don't dispute that.
In fact, I'd expect as much considering all the work that went into suppressing this story during the run up to the election.
So where's the evidence for that, suppressing the story?
D
Darkwood
Big tech is involved in this suppression, think about that.
When you search you use a search engine, if that search engine is suppressing certain information and sites then how do you know it is, you will simply believe the direction it heads you and almost certainly it will push you to information that suits its own agenda.
If you were privy enough to see or witness he evidence you are left in no doubt this is real and not what you see as the top listings on your search engine would have your believe.
Remember even the fact checker sites are run by people of the liberal left and they very carefully word things to give a certain impression while conveniently leaving out vital information, they do not exactly lie but they push a narrative to push you to think a certain way and is why people like Candace Owens a spoken out conservative voice has successfully sued these platforms in the past.
Let's say we have a social media platform that refuses to align with the Silicon Valley view, we did, in fact we have on a few occasions and what happens is an orchestrated attack that wipes them off the face of the digital world.
This happened several years ago with a platform called Gab and more recently with Parler, neither of these sites had content on them that couldn't be found on Twitter but it wasn't about the content, it was about the fact the deep state couldn't control them the way they have with big tech so an orchestrated attack was done. Gab actually rebuilt itself to be totally independent from the rest of the tech and they now have no way of pulling the plug on Gab, Parler however were riding on the very systems of big tech that supported its forum, they removed the apps, they cut off the servers and blocked the addresses all because Parler wouldn't play ball, the irony here is Twitter are far from angels themselves ... in fact none of the popular platforms are but here are 2 reports and it beggars belief that twitter has the audacity to criticise Parler and its content yet still remain in the app store even though ... see below.
www.newsgram.com
Twitter refused to remove child ---- because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit - https://nypost.com/2021/01/21/twitter-sued-for-allegedly-refusing-to-remove-child-----/
What you see on the internet if it is politically conscious or doesn't follow the liberal far left agenda pushed by silicon valley and the deep state will be removed while they happily turn the other cheek to companies that bow down to their instructions and it doesn't matter how hypocritical they are or how guilty they are of the same or even worse.
When you search you use a search engine, if that search engine is suppressing certain information and sites then how do you know it is, you will simply believe the direction it heads you and almost certainly it will push you to information that suits its own agenda.
If you were privy enough to see or witness he evidence you are left in no doubt this is real and not what you see as the top listings on your search engine would have your believe.
Remember even the fact checker sites are run by people of the liberal left and they very carefully word things to give a certain impression while conveniently leaving out vital information, they do not exactly lie but they push a narrative to push you to think a certain way and is why people like Candace Owens a spoken out conservative voice has successfully sued these platforms in the past.
Let's say we have a social media platform that refuses to align with the Silicon Valley view, we did, in fact we have on a few occasions and what happens is an orchestrated attack that wipes them off the face of the digital world.
This happened several years ago with a platform called Gab and more recently with Parler, neither of these sites had content on them that couldn't be found on Twitter but it wasn't about the content, it was about the fact the deep state couldn't control them the way they have with big tech so an orchestrated attack was done. Gab actually rebuilt itself to be totally independent from the rest of the tech and they now have no way of pulling the plug on Gab, Parler however were riding on the very systems of big tech that supported its forum, they removed the apps, they cut off the servers and blocked the addresses all because Parler wouldn't play ball, the irony here is Twitter are far from angels themselves ... in fact none of the popular platforms are but here are 2 reports and it beggars belief that twitter has the audacity to criticise Parler and its content yet still remain in the app store even though ... see below.
Twitter Shares Child Abuse Content On Social Media: IWF
The UK-based Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) has revealed that nearly half of the child abuse content in the social media space is being shared openly on micro-blogging platform Twitter.According to a report in The Telegraph that accessed the IWF data, 49 per cent of the images, videos and url...
www.newsgram.com
Twitter refused to remove child ---- because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit - https://nypost.com/2021/01/21/twitter-sued-for-allegedly-refusing-to-remove-child-----/
What you see on the internet if it is politically conscious or doesn't follow the liberal far left agenda pushed by silicon valley and the deep state will be removed while they happily turn the other cheek to companies that bow down to their instructions and it doesn't matter how hypocritical they are or how guilty they are of the same or even worse.
N
nicebutdim
The post above gives a fairly good account of how these things happen.
Not sure how I can prove that a story was suppressed. Some people save before and after screen shots of stories that have been heavily edited or removed entirely, but I'm not really concerned about going to those lengths in order to win a later argument.
Surely we all believe in something we want to believe in???
Are you telling me Santa Claus isn’t real???
D
Darkwood
A bold statement in deed, you basically have taken the position that you are right and those that probably differ in opinion are wrong and they are in a fantasy world of some kind.
When it comes to the USA and especially its accusations of child sexual abuse it is a difficult subject matter to prove given the extent and lengths they go to cover it up. I am also bound to consider what I can post here, some of it that would have you question what you think you know is not suitable for this forum and would bring the wrong kind of attention to the forum.
I however can give you plenty of closer to home examples of news suppression that lasted decades.
-The BBC and Jimmy Saville - they knew all along and protected him, the BBC has officially apologised for decades of cover up. (remember the infamous sex pistols interview in 1978 where Lydon exposes the cover up that effectively got him banned and all we saw is news outlet after news outlet attack Lydon for his 'lies') ... 30yrs it took for it to be exposed and now we look at that moment in a very different light.
- Child grooming gangs prevalent throughout the UK in the muslim communities, again we saw systematic cover up from government, police, councils, care services for decades and anyone that mentioned it were some kind of racist and/or conspiracist, whistle blowers who tried were often threatened, lost their jobs etc and still to this day we have a government report that was promised to be released to the public and not held back on because of ethnic sensitivity but said report remains out of public view and the reason why is it is damning and exposes a much larger problem than they even realised.
-Global children's charities helping 3rd world nations swarming with volunteers that for decades were molesting and raping the kids they were supposed to be helping, buried until a few yrs ago even after yrs of accusations.
I and others here are no conspiracy theorists when it comes to a lot of what has been discussed, you will struggle to find it on normal internet searches because they simply do not want you to find it, take it from someone that has seen a lot of the evidence before it was erased from the internet, if you seriously want to take that pill and see the real world you live it it isn't very nice but you cannot go back, it means using search engines and sites that do not share your info and VPN's to mask your IP to some extent although you can safely scratch the surface enough to convince even the largest doubter without the need to go that far.
All you have to do over the US election is answer the simplest of questions or ask it as I have already done so with no reply from anyone.
- If the election was not rigged then the biggest piece of evidence was simply for the democrats to provide access to the Ballots and the counting machines, this would have confirmed from day 1 the legitimacy of the elections and ended this last november, however what has happened and is still happened even under court order to release them is a refusal to access them even to this day - not only do we have republicans asking this question but we have plenty of democrats themselves asking the same question because they believe a fair election is more important than losing to Trump.
Last edited by a moderator:
next thing is we'll be told is that Star Trek is fiction.
no need for formality. "Tel" will do. ??
G
GBDamo
All true but to be honest I genuinely now think that ignorance IS bliss.
If you haven't looked for this stuff don't but also accept that you are ignorant.
Best to keep out of these topics, I don't know what good they do.
D
Darkwood
True - many occasions over the yrs I have often thought it is better to actually live in ignorance and just enjoy the basics of life than to know what is really going on although I don't really discuss this outside of the online world, when friends and family have lived in this media and government created bubble for decades it isn't easy to change their whole perception of the real world and is why it is a hard pill to swallow at first.
Most conspiracies out there are stupid and clearly reserved to the realms of crazy people but one has to realise that conspiracy is a convenient tag to help hide an uncomfortable truth especially by those in power and control.
What I object to strongly is the right wing insinuation specifically highlighting child grooming gangs to Muslim communities. Yes there have been grooming gangs linked to muslim communities but is this anymore prevalent than any other community? All the perverts I arrested were all dirty old white anglo saxons. I can tell you for a fact that across the board kids in care, due to lack of support and supervision have always been exposed to exploitation... a clear failure of our social service resourcing. Go back a few years and these children were treated as problem offenders due to the disruption they caused in communities due to drugs, theft and disorder. No one actually looked at the causes. What you have seen is a change on policing and social culture in the last few years. These kids would/do not talk or cooperate with police so bringing about prosecutions was extremely difficult. Its only in recent years that changes in legislation have enabled victims more support in giving evidence and also the ability to bring about victim-less prosecutions.
G
GBDamo
Damo's first law of conspiracy theories;-
"The closer you are to the truth the greater the proportion of what you read is bollux"
Pretty much all conspiracy theories have a kernel of truth then two things happen. One, deliberately misinformation is sewn and two, the internet goes into meltdown about it.
G
GBDamo
Its no the noncing, as you point out, there are many more white nonces but these tend to be solo nonces operating from positions of familiarity on an opportunity.
The issue with Asian gangs is that there is a racist element, one that the establishment does not want to recognise let alone tackle. White girls are seen as trash and acceptable targets by far too many in these communities while their own young women are locked up and married off to uncles in some Stan somewhere.
Local councils and law enforcement don't want to look too closely at the Asian night time economy for fear of being labeled racist themselves but there are thousands of horny young Asian men predating on drunk or vulnerable young women.
Similar threads
- Article
- The Tile Association
- Tilers Forums - UK Tiling Forum.
OFFICIAL SPONSORS
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
Advert
Thread Information
Advert
Advert
TrueNAS JBOD Storage Server
-
-
Understanding TrueNAS JBOD Servers: A Comprehensive Guide- Started by Dan
- Replies: 8
-
