New Garage Supply Certs

[spark 68]

you already have one completed EIC for your original work , that cant be changed so put it to one side.
the rest of the planned work can be recorded on 1 extra EIC with 2 test schedules.
christ almighty.

Depends on if it has already been notified or not, often if I know there is additional work to do, with the CU change as a prelude, I will hold back the paperwork until the job is finished, although I will not hold it back for months and months on end.

 

[Guest55]

Am i missing something here ???
What has notification got to do with how you write out your certs ?? they completely seperate issues.
And Murdoch you cant add to the original cert once its been signed and dated even if your test software allows you to do so.

 

[spark 68]

I'm now getting lost here guys, looks like i'll be charging more to fill out Certs than for doing the actual job.

I was thinking of producing a new EIC for the installation of the sub main and adding a second SoTR for the garage. If it's wrong then i'll hold my hand up.

No, not really,

If the job has already been notified, then you have no choice but to issue another EIC, but this will include two sets of SoI's and two sets of SoTR's (although you may be able to use one SoI for the lot), as Biff said.

You need two sets of SoTR's as you have two different installs, with two different supply characteristics, if this makes sense.

Bloody difficult to word on a forum!

 

[spark 68]

Am i missing something here ???
What has notification got to do with how you write out your certs ?? the completely seperate issues.
And Murdoch you cant add to the original cert once its been signed and dated even if you test software allows you to do so.

Because, if it has not gone through (notified yet), he can notify it all as one job, hence under One EIC, when you notify you have to put the description and extent of the work, this can all be included together.

 

[Guest55]

i've no lip left to chew on so im outta here lol.

 

[Thomps]

The original Cert for replacing the CU has been signed off and notified.

I'll be able to produce a new EIC solely for the installation of the sub main. I will then add a second sheet of test results for the installed components in the garage from the second board.

If this isn't acceptable can you please explain why?

Sorry gents - you must be sick of this by now!

 

[spark 68]

As an example Biff,

If I fit a new CU one week, and I know for definate there is a shower to fit the week after, then I will not finalise the paperwork or notify it until the Job is finished, this is common sense, it saves duplicate paperwork and two notifications and attendant fees.

 

[sparks1973]

Why is a DB feeding another DB via a sub-mains a problem ?
Testing is the same as any other final circuit.

except if its feeding a sub board...it isn`t a final circuit is it....

 

[spark 68]

except if its feeding a sub board...it isn`t a final circuit is it....​

​

No, but it is treat as such for the sub main on the SoTR for the feeding DB OCPD etc.

 

[Guest55]

except if its feeding a sub board...it isn`t a final circuit is it....

FFS i never said it was ?? , just that you approach the testing of it in the same way.

 

[Swicade]

Go with what biff55 says in my opinion.

Alot of the other posts seem to be a brain storming session going on leading to some confusion allround.