Discuss Non Con on Annual Assessemnt - Minimum Irradiance Levels on String Tests??? in the Solar PV Forum | Solar Panels Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Gavins comments above fit very much with my view of this. There is no requirement for the temperature of the panels to be measured and without taking this into account the figures are really just to look at wether you are in the right ballpark. Thats not to say they should introduce temperatures as part of the testing, just that the figures should be taken for what they are.

There is no logical need for figures accurate to within 5%.
 
from 62446:
...5.4.5.2 PV string- short circuit test
...test is to verify that there are no major faults within the PV array wiring
~ low irradiance testing cannot verify this as Elecsa explain
...these tests are not to be taken as a measure of module/array performance.
~ results will not be accurate enough for performance testing without taking other things into account ie cell temp./string cable resistance.
...For non-stable irradiance conditions, the following methods can be adopted:
* testing can be delayed
* tests can be done using multiple meters with one meter on a reference string
* an irradiance meter reading may be used to adjust the current readings
~there is no mention of min. irradiance levels but below 200W it is less likely to see current proportional to irradiance (as comments show) and City and Guilds 2399 have included this "200W" threshold level in their corricullum (from what I remember) which is far more relevent when fault finding.
...62446 also has PV string operational tests (5.4.5.3) conducted under normal operation (mpp) conditions, although no reporting of results is included in the model test form.
I also agree that temp. readings are important to performance testing, but here again more so if you are fault finding and need more accurate analysis.
C&G include cell temp.recording and "expected" values for Isc & Voc to be calculated and all shown on their test form, which goes beyond 62446 requirements: although they are covering faultfinding in the course.
~the 5% diversity of string outputs is to verify the design requirements have been met which is more about damage limitation to modules and inverters and was far more relevent when module outputs were more diverse within a batch; on multiple string systems, less so now, modules were moved arround the arrays to different strings to meet the 5% tolerance during commissioning.
 

Reply to Non Con on Annual Assessemnt - Minimum Irradiance Levels on String Tests??? in the Solar PV Forum | Solar Panels Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi all, total newbie to the forum. I sincerely hope that those in the know-how would be able to assist me. On my semi-detached house we have an...
Replies
13
Views
2K
I know how I was taught to test a RCD, 6 tests in all two no go, two under 300 mS and 2 under 40 mS with no load. But thinking about it not so...
Replies
7
Views
3K
I'm not an electrician, just a householder (though do work in an area given a kick in the family jewels by government decision last year). I am...
Replies
12
Views
3K
I have an issue with a system which i can't get my head around. If anyone can shed some light on it it would be much appreciated... The rig is...
Replies
93
Views
15K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock