soapdoggy
DIY
Over the holiday period my partner returned home to her apartment with no power. None of the internal breakers in the consumer unit had tripped and so she was unsure what to do. She called an electrician who took the cover off the consumer unit and then showed her these singed breakers across the board. The main fuse had blown (which sits outside the apartment in the lobby) and that was replaced by the electricity company and the electrician replaced the entire set of breakers and RCDs in the consumer unit, without providing any explanation for the fault. He said the consumer unit is approx 15 years old, which we understand to be correct.
The electrician charged approx 4x the appropriate cost for each breaker and RCD and aggressively overcharged for the time, and I feel my partner was taken for a ride here. When I found out about this event I asked another electrician to come and assess the new work and to help diagnose why we have a fault in the first place. The second electrician, upon seeing these photos, suggested that the first electrician had taken a lighter or flame to create these burn marks across the unit and created a situation of duress so he could do emergency work at holiday rates.
The quality of the replacement work is not great, two of the RCDs are too small (40 amp instead of 64) and he has forced and bent some of the connection terminals to make the breakers fit the buss bar. The second electrician is quoting a tiny amount of money (and an appropriate amount) compared to the first to upgrade the RCDs that are too small and tidy up the breakers that don't properly fit the buss bar. I know trades often insult the work of other trades, but the second electrician was much more candid and helpful and clearly pointed out additional risks, and even offered to liase with the first electrician to try and rectify the issues instead of charging us to repair recently done shoddy work.
So the question, is this what really happened?
The electrician charged approx 4x the appropriate cost for each breaker and RCD and aggressively overcharged for the time, and I feel my partner was taken for a ride here. When I found out about this event I asked another electrician to come and assess the new work and to help diagnose why we have a fault in the first place. The second electrician, upon seeing these photos, suggested that the first electrician had taken a lighter or flame to create these burn marks across the unit and created a situation of duress so he could do emergency work at holiday rates.
The quality of the replacement work is not great, two of the RCDs are too small (40 amp instead of 64) and he has forced and bent some of the connection terminals to make the breakers fit the buss bar. The second electrician is quoting a tiny amount of money (and an appropriate amount) compared to the first to upgrade the RCDs that are too small and tidy up the breakers that don't properly fit the buss bar. I know trades often insult the work of other trades, but the second electrician was much more candid and helpful and clearly pointed out additional risks, and even offered to liase with the first electrician to try and rectify the issues instead of charging us to repair recently done shoddy work.
So the question, is this what really happened?