was going to reply but lost interest :)

apart from incorrect terminology, i think you are carrying out correct procedure
 
Well done on spotting the terminological faux pas, but I think anyone that can spot a problem with not getting 0.14 has a pretty good idea what they are talking about.

As the readings are pretty well balanced, it would suggest that the L-N s have been correctly cross connected. The only reason I can think of for the higher than expected reading is a poor connection on one of the two temporary links. If the odd socket was higher that would suggest a spur for that, but the fact that it is lower is beyond me. I would try a insulation test at 250v to rule out connected load. (a pump motor capacitor can do funny things to test instruments) Before spending the rest of the day pulling the circuit apart. Best of luck!
 
¬

Thanks again for all your replies. Tested the RFC again this morning and all was well. I either didn't zero my test leads or didn't connect the ends in a correct figure of eight! So much for working late to get the job finished !!!
 
very easy to make a mistake especially when day is dragging on, often a fresh pair of eyes or night off will help sole the issue
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
What am I not doing?
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
18

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
mickyh,
Last reply from
ezzzekiel,
Replies
18
Views
2,055

Advert

Back
Top