Discuss Will Zs measurements be redundant under the 17th Edition? in the Canada area at ElectriciansForums.net

Think the only way out of this information impasse is to approach manufacturers and ask for the max fault current that their RCD's and RCCBO's will withstand WITHIN STATED RCD OPERATION TIMES i.e. mS.
I suspect in many cases these withstand currents will be less than the earth fault loop impedance will let through in the event of an earth fault .
Then one relies on the MCB part of the RCCBO or a Fuse to break the fault current at much longer operating times and ELZ becomes highly important.
It is not unknown for max withstand current for RCD to be say 200 amps and min operating current for MCB to be 300 amps (30 amp type C MCB) ELZ 0.64ohms is imperative.
Regards Mijo
 
Ok chaps

just watched a joint NICEIC/Megger DVD on intitial verification

They state on there that where circuits are RCD protected, the Zs reading need only be taken with a low resolution meter capable of measuring 1667 ohms

I also have in front of me a copy of "Guide to the Wiring Regulations BS7671:2008"
published by no less than the ECA

Page 63 has the following quote under the heading "Irrelevant ELI specification"

"A common source of misunderstanding is that of either specifying or measuring values of ELI where the circuit also has an RCD fitted. ELI measurement under these circumastances is a futile exercise. The circuit will have been checked for continuity, and this is what is needed, together with, of course, functional checks of the RCD...........and for clarification, circuits with RCBO's do not need to meet the specified ELI values"

So back to the original post - will Zs values be irrelevant under the 17th edition? (for RCD protected circuits)


Well I think they will
NICEIC think they will
Megger think they will
The ECA think they will

and for information, the IET often adopt the ECA's reccomendations

*shakey takes a bow*

Hate to say i am right chaps, but, ........erm........point proved i think:p


Absolutely agree!! Continuity test will tell you all about the circuit (loose connections, circuit lenght etc). the rule is simple anyway if you have measured R1+R2 and also Ze you automatically have a Zs value without measuring.
 

Reply to Will Zs measurements be redundant under the 17th Edition? in the Canada area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi First time with this kind of a job for me. I have a scenario where i am planning to install about 50m 25mm TPN from a TNCS supply to supply a...
Replies
32
Views
6K
When I joined this forum a decade or so back, there was a discussion going on about a welder that was connected with a 3-core cable to L1, L2 and...
Replies
3
Views
2K
A bit of a mini essay but these questions have been building up in my mind over the last weeks and months as I've been studying and volunteering...
Replies
6
Views
3K
Hopefully someone wiser than me can help explain some odd measurements I’ve taken at my own home. This is a long read, I’ve tried to give as much...
Replies
21
Views
4K
Just a rant regarding all these landlords EICRs that have become the in thing. And maybe a word of caution to all of you doing them. To kick off...
Replies
151
Views
11K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock