Guest viewing is limited
just brushing up on the 18th edition before I take the refresher this week. Iv seen Regulation 521.10.202 which basically states cables need to be supported throughout the installation in such a way they do not get in the way in the result of a fire. Does this mean cable clips on ceilings / upper floors are not longer used due to them being plastic?
 
In a nutshell yes there is a thread about this wait and I’ll have a dig about to find it here’s a report on fixings makes good reading if your looking to see which fixings to use
https://electrical.------.org/media/1578/fire-performance-of-cable-supports.pdf
 
Personally I have thought this to be somewhat puzzling, the whole requirements around this subject. Remembering this all came out of the greater London Fire fighter observations that there operatives were being electrocuted from live wires I suppose breaking and dangling and making contact. The puzzle for me is what happened to protection. A cable subjected to flames should surely cause the migration of conductive parts to short out and activate the protection for that circuit. So in a home 6242y or whatever similar type should start to melt and set off the MCB, why doesn't it?
 
Yes indeed, plastic mini trunking or conduit cant be used anywhere in the building either without fire proof supports at suitable intervals.
This used to only apply to escape routes but in the 18th it applies throughout the building.

Plastic mini trunking or conduit is not the problem, they just melt in a fire. Cables within the trunking/conduit are the problem as they can cause entanglement with fire fighters.
 
Plastic mini trunking or conduit is not the problem, they just melt in a fire. Cables within the trunking/conduit are the problem as they can cause entanglement with fire fighters.
Then surely they are exactly the problem, because in the event of a fire they are not doing an adequate job of supporting / protecting the cables within.
To clarify; the new regulation is regarding cable supports.
 
Then surely they are exactly the problem, because in the event of a fire they are not doing an adequate job of supporting / protecting the cables within.
To clarify; the new regulation is regarding cable supports.

upload_2018-11-26_11-23-24.png


See note 4 for use with plastic trunking.
 
Which is exactly what I said in my first reply...

Sorry mate.... Monday morning and all that....
I missed the bit from your post about "without fire proof supports at suitable intervals."... I'm sure it wasn't there before... :tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy: but my reply has it in as well...
That's why I posted. It sounded like you were saying plastic trunking was not allowed... end of...

I think I need to go home....
 
Yes plastic cable clips are now banned, as are red rawl plugs:confused:

These regs are mostly for large public buildings but not for your average domestic household.
Places you would normally use metal trunking or tray anyway. Just have to add metal cable ties along with the plastic ones.

I read somewhere else on the forum that ceiling plasterboard is sufficient to stop any cables dropping into the firefighters in the domestic situation.
 
Personally I have thought this to be somewhat puzzling, the whole requirements around this subject. Remembering this all came out of the greater London Fire fighter observations that there operatives were being electrocuted from live wires I suppose breaking and dangling and making contact.

This regulation has come about as a result of the deaths of firefighters who became trapped in cables which had fallen down in burning buildings.
The coroners in these cases made the recommendations.

Your post is the first I've heard of any electric shock incident related to this.
 
I think note 3 makes it reasonably clear, although I did have to check the meaning of 'precludes'!
You can't use non-metalic fixings as the ONLY means of support where cables are clipped to exposed surfaces, I take this to mean that above plasterboard (i think standard board is 30min fire rated?) it is fine to use plastic clips etc.
Think about old pubs with all the cables just clipped to the exposed joists etc - big no no now.
Non metalic trunking as sole means of support is not allowed - so must also use metal fixings within the trunking.

What's not so clear is if you can apply some common sense to this - knowing what the intention of the reg is (firefighter safety predominantly) so what are we saying about low level trunking, or even dado trunking around offices?
 
That's how I interpret it too but you wouldn't usually surface mount cables on a new domestic installation anyway would you?

Been to a job today where surface trunking will be considered due to the upstairs lighting needing rewired in a flat roof house.
Also done a few flats before with concrete floors and ceilings where surface trunking is the preferred option.
Wiring in domestic garages and outbuildings is usually done surface in trunking or conduit too.
 
What's not so clear is if you can apply some common sense to this - knowing what the intention of the reg is (firefighter safety predominantly) so what are we saying about low level trunking, or even dado trunking around offices?

In my opinion, I would say that the reg also applies to this as well.
In fires, fire fighters hug walls. The reg is intended to stop entanglement. I don't think the fire fighters would be impressed if their feet were getting entangled in cables..
 
true, ive seen and used the metal clips designed to go in trunking, whats the solution for plastic conduit?

Use metal. Metal saddles on plastic conduit have been used for years by fire alarm installers. You can get powder coated saddles to match PVC conduit too.
Also saw something lately at a local wholesaler trade event that was like a buckle clip for conduit, can't remember the brand though I'm afraid.
 
Personally I have thought this to be somewhat puzzling, the whole requirements around this subject. Remembering this all came out of the greater London Fire fighter observations that there operatives were being electrocuted from live wires I suppose breaking and dangling and making contact. The puzzle for me is what happened to protection. A cable subjected to flames should surely cause the migration of conductive parts to short out and activate the protection for that circuit. So in a home 6242y or whatever similar type should start to melt and set off the MCB, why doesn't it?
I think it’s more the entanglement risk than the risk of electric shock Vort
 
I think note 3 makes it reasonably clear, although I did have to check the meaning of 'precludes'!
You can't use non-metalic fixings as the ONLY means of support where cables are clipped to exposed surfaces, I take this to mean that above plasterboard (i think standard board is 30min fire rated?) it is fine to use plastic clips etc.
Think about old pubs with all the cables just clipped to the exposed joists etc - big no no now.
Non metalic trunking as sole means of support is not allowed - so must also use metal fixings within the trunking.

What's not so clear is if you can apply some common sense to this - knowing what the intention of the reg is (firefighter safety predominantly) so what are we saying about low level trunking, or even dado trunking around offices?
Personally i think any wiring or wiring system that has the potential to collapse from its original position, whether it be ceiling wall or dado height would come into this really the only exception in my view would be trunking at skirting level actually touching the floor or similar as if the containment melted the cabling wouldn’t go anywhere it may be a bit overkill but it’s a damn sight better than if the worst were to ever happen knowing you could have easily done something to prevent it.

I have taken the lid off some seriously full dado trunking before and there was a very real risk that someone could fall over and become entangled in the cables that all fell out the install in question was on two walls in an office and removing one piece Resulted in the lid on the adjacent wall coming off from the weight of the cabling and the cables falling quite far into the room....
 
Remember when the 16th Edition first came out and we were frantically cross bonding anything and everything metal?
...Well I'm anticipating the 19th Edition instructing us to cross bond all these metal clips - *this is a joke!

Maybe they will have to ban metal tooth fillings, as they will need bonding with 10mm.... so you end up looking like a Borg
 

What is missing from this discussion is a definition of the word premature, as it is used in the regulation. I don't have a copy of the 18th yet and can't look to see if it's one of those terms that is defined in Part 2.

At some point between the fire starting and the building being entirely consumed, the collapse of the wiring system is not premature - it is inevitable. We'd all look like construction gods if, in the aftermath of an inferno, the wiring was still perfectly in tact while every other trade's work was no longer identifiable. So, at what point is it not premature for the wiring to collapse? Are we talking ourselves into an impossible corner by trying to keep the wiring suspended beyond what is reasonable to expect?

Plumbers are using plastic piping these days, they're just as likely to collapse and cause entanglement issues; are they having this regulation too?

I have no answers, but I'm not sure the discussion has been entirely about the right question.
 
Plumbers are using plastic piping these days, they're just as likely to collapse and cause entanglement issues; are they having this regulation too?
Plastic pipes would melt themselves, and for gas only metal piping is allowed.
I think premature has the obvious meaning that the wiring system doesn't fall before the elements it is attached to fail.
So if the ceiling is down, the wiring can be down, but if it was almost like a trap where the wiring is supported by plastic supports that melt when a fire comes in, that is premature.
 
What is missing from this discussion is a definition of the word premature, as it is used in the regulation. I don't have a copy of the 18th yet and can't look to see if it's one of those terms that is defined in Part 2.

At some point between the fire starting and the building being entirely consumed, the collapse of the wiring system is not premature - it is inevitable. We'd all look like construction gods if, in the aftermath of an inferno, the wiring was still perfectly in tact while every other trade's work was no longer identifiable. So, at what point is it not premature for the wiring to collapse? Are we talking ourselves into an impossible corner by trying to keep the wiring suspended beyond what is reasonable to expect?

Plumbers are using plastic piping these days, they're just as likely to collapse and cause entanglement issues; are they having this regulation too?

I have no answers, but I'm not sure the discussion has been entirely about the right question.

As per @johnduffell post #37 above.
I'm sure if one of your relatives was a fire fighter (Not that any of mine are) you would be wanting to look out for them.
Just think about it logically. Again, see post #37.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Swansea

Thread Information

Title
Regulation 521.10.202 - Wiring systems
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
39
Unsolved
--

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Scott Jacob,
Last reply from
Pete999,
Replies
39
Views
8,340

Advert

Back
Top