Embarrassingly 20p a year.
More fool themI don’t agree that you can earn 10k a year more just subbing to companies. Only if your on price. Most subbies I know only take home 30 pound a week more than me and have to spend 50 pound a week on fuel, plus van costs. Better off cards in unless you have you own company.
Bananas in 1983 were 38p a pound and today 38p a pound - moral of the story, eat more bananas!Not sure what is funny about my comment @Murdoch
In 1996 a loaf of bread was 55p. Today it is £1.06. That is a 100% rise.
In 1996 a litre of petrol was 53p. Today it is £1.20. That is a 110% rise.
Has an electricians rate gone up by this much?
See, bananas are a hot topic!I'm off to view a house in half an hour. It is up for offers over £160k. It last sold in 1998 for £27k
The larger Victorian houses in the area have seen a rise in the same time frame from about £80k to £250-300k
Bananas.
This is why o will always be cards in. The reward isn’t there anymore for the risk. I would rather let someone else have the headaches.I sub from a company at the moment. And by the time you pay running costs for van, insurance, pay for courses, tools, test equipment and calibration, reference books and all that jazz I am thinking may as well go shelf filling at local shop. I'm based in Hertfordshire and not anywhere near on some of the figures being stated on here. And the fact i got a hernia on a job and lost money for being off I'll. Need to really start thinking about going back to cards or doing more of my own stuff. Or go shelf filling.
What's that as a percentage ? If you started on £1 it's not bad !In 23 years my total wage raise relates to 20 pence a year,is that sarcastically good,I don’t think so.
It's certainly harder to get on the property ladder now than 25 years ago... but nowhere near as hard as the media like to make it out to be....My kids haven't got a chance ......... unless the misses and I get run over....
It's certainly harder to get on the property ladder now than 25 years ago... but nowhere near as hard as the media like to make it out to be.
Not sure I agree with that. As usual location matters and here (in Surrey) a 1 bed flat would be around £200K, so this has a huge impact on people wanting to buy as they need £30K to £40K deposit ........ so even if they cut out holidays, cars, nights out, new trainers and phones, they still have a lot of saving to do ....
When I joined the housing market, my studio flat cost about 4 x salary, the same flat now would be around £250K according to rightmove ...... and I don't see many people earning £60K plus in their early twenties
Don’t blame ya ferg, it’s bloody stunning up where you are!It's kind of mostly been the case that to get a foot on the property ladder compromises have to be made on location, certainly from my experience.
I'm lucky in that I've always lived in areas with reasonable property prices.
The downside of that of course is that I would not be able to move to Surrey without a mortgage. Fortunately I have absolutely no intention of moving to Surrey.![]()
The downside of that of course is that I would not be able to move to Surrey without a mortgage. Fortunately I have absolutely no intention of moving to Surrey.![]()
If the Scots moved out then it might be worth a shot........Friends of ours relocated to just outside Inverness - and they know its a 1 way ticket ............ that said parts of Scotland are truly stunning, but whether I would want to live their is another subject!
If the Scots moved out then it might be worth a shot........
Yeah... but it's far cheaper these days to buy... we had almost 10% interest costs back then ! And you needed at least 10% deposit compared to 5% minimums these days... and no 'help to buy' schemes......When I joined the housing market, my studio flat cost about 4 x salary, the same flat now would be around £250K according to rightmove ...... and I don't see many people earning £60K plus in their early twenties
Yeah... but it's far cheaper these days to buy... we had almost 10% interest costs back then ! And you needed at least 10% deposit compared to 5% minimums these days... and no 'help to buy' schemes...
No wonder you moved to Woking.......That's a bit harsh ...... I have relatives up there!
No wonder you moved to Woking.......
I agree with that. I saved thousands for a deposit on a house. Worked loads of hours, weekends etc, then before I bought a house I got testicular cancer and had to have 12 months off. So I had to live on all the money I saved. So now I’m still renting. It’s been a long road back to work and I’m still not right even two years later. Chemo messes you up for life. But I’m still here. I couldn’t put myself through that agin working all those hours and not having holidays. I wouldn’t be able to keep up the pace now. I’m shattered these days after a 45 hour week. I’m just glad to be alive. If I end up buying a house one day then happy days, if I don’t then it is what it is. My health is more important to me. And I don’t even know if I will make it to 65 without being morbid lol. So I’m not worrying about what happens when I get there financially. People worry about the future to much and forget to actually live. I think if your gona buy a house you need to save up while you still live with parents. And this is not taught to us at school like it should be.Not sure I agree with that. As usual location matters and here (in Surrey) a 1 bed flat would be around £200K, so this has a huge impact on people wanting to buy as they need £30K to £40K deposit ........ so even if they cut out holidays, cars, nights out, new trainers and phones, they still have a lot of saving to do ....
When I joined the housing market, my studio flat cost about 4 x salary, the same flat now would be around £250K according to rightmove ...... and I don't see many people earning £60K plus in their early twenties
Poor sod.......I was brought up here .........
Yeah... but it's far cheaper these days to buy... we had almost 10% interest costs back then ! And you needed at least 10% deposit compared to 5% minimums these days... and no 'help to buy' schemes...
Wages back then were more realistic in relation to house prices than now.Yeah... but it's far cheaper these days to buy... we had almost 10% interest costs back then ! And you needed at least 10% deposit compared to 5% minimums these days... and no 'help to buy' schemes...
i agree. Help to buy is just another form of debt. And the houses they offer on help to buy are normally £200,000 plus. If you need to resort to help to buy then not in a position to buy a 200k house. In Germany 90% rent. It’s not the done thing to buy. I think it’s too far beyond a lot of people’s reaches these days. People just aren’t earning enough money to afford to buy because wages haven’t caught upHelp to buy is a con, me on a wage in London back in 1985 bought a 4 bed semi for £48k on a sparks wages that same house in now worth £1.2M if I could earn £300k per year as a sparks I may consider taking a wage cut to do something that I enjoy............
The ones in power and I mean the real ones in power just want us all in perpetual debt, from student loans through to mortgages and PCP loans as its a control mechanism and then when you die you get arse raped for inheritance tax where that money could really help your children/grandchildren get a foot on the ladder.Wages back then were more realistic in relation to house prices than now.
i agree. Help to buy is just another form of debt. And the houses they offer on help to buy are normally £200,000 plus. If you need to resort to help to buy then not in a position to buy a 200k house. In Germany 90% rent. It’s not the done thing to buy. I think it’s too far beyond a lot of people’s reaches these days. People just aren’t earning enough money to afford to buy because wages haven’t caught up
It can be done when still at home with parents. But once you have a mrs and a kid it’s 10 times harderIt's certainly harder to get on the property ladder now than 25 years ago... but nowhere near as hard as the media like to make it out to be.
There was a thing on the radio about it a few months back... youngsters calling in to say how they had done it... it was amusing because the show obviously wanted to make the point about how difficult it was... but many callers said they'd just had to save up really hard and work long hours to do it. That's exactly how it was when I first bought... having 2 jobs, not going out, not going on holidays etc. etc...
Its a lot easier to be honest as you'd rather be at work then dealing with a couple of screaming kids and an un hinged missus, "anyone for OT", hand straight up.........It can be done when still at home with parents. But once you have a mrs and a kid it’s 10 times harder
My mrs wouldn’t have that. They always say you ain’t a sparky until you have had a divorceIts a lot easier to be honest as you'd rather be at work then dealing with a couple of screaming kids and an un hinged missus, "anyone for OT", hand straight up.........
Lol stuck on a building site with a loads of blokes doubt it happens, working in IT in an office full of fit hotties leads to temptation.My mrs wouldn’t have that. They always say you ain’t a sparky until you have had a divorce
I bought my first house for £29k back in 1995. I spent £15k doing it up plus the usual maintenance costs until I sold it in 2004 for £180k. Ive noticed its now up for sale advertised at £369k!I'm off to view a house in half an hour. It is up for offers over £160k. It last sold in 1998 for £27k
The larger Victorian houses in the area have seen a rise in the same time frame from about £80k to £250-300k
Bananas.
Big mistake, if you believe in something then follow it thorough and don't rely on others, you had doubts that was your mistake.I bought my first house for £29k back in 1995. I spent £15k doing it up plus the usual maintenance costs until I sold it in 2004 for £180k. Ive noticed its now up for sale advertised at £369k!
Back in the late 90's I tried desperately to convince my wife that we should invest money in property. I had the means and skills to do them up and we had no children so no other commitments. She already hated the fact that I was self-employed always wanted me to get a "proper" job. We ended up splitting up over our differences and I ended up broke in the process.
Hindsight eh? Now I've got the financial means to invest, I haven't got the time and property is far too expensive with profit margins to be gained smaller than ever.