Main bonding to do or not to do

[Pete999]

We’ll need 3 dozen buckets of popcorn and around 7 tin hats - STAT!

Nah just the remains of the Cote Du Rhone will do for me Rpa07, happy as Larry.

 

[Rpa07]

Cheers Larry999!

Nah just the remains of the Cote Du Rhone will do for me Rpa07, happy as Larry.

 

[Deleted member 9648]

If it's extraneous bond it, if it's not don't. End of.

 

[cliffed]

If it's extraneous bond it, if it's not don't. End of.

Cheers,Oh I say !!,

 

[davesparks]

Yes I stand corrected I shouldnt have said that, it is meant to be an unbroken run from met.

No need for an unbroken run, the regs don't require this. It just has to be at least the minimum required size from MET through to bonding connection.

 

[The Flyinhos]

A guide to the determination of extraneous-conductive-parts
A guide to the determination of extraneous-conductive-parts - https://www.voltimum.co.uk/articles/guide-determination-extraneous

 

[Toneyz]

When you say portacabin is this just a shell container or a lined out one as you see as site offices, canteens etc?

 

[Toneyz]

When you say portacabin is this just a shell container or a lined out one as you see as site offices, canteens etc?

Why the optimistic Pete? the reason I asked was that if it was a kitted out unit with an existing consumer unit the metal container shell is bonded to the consumer unit.

 

[Pete999]

Why the optimistic Pete? the reason I asked was that if it was a kitted out unit with an existing consumer unit the metal container shell is bonded to the consumer unit.

Just optimistic that the OP was aware of what you were saying nothing against you Mate

 

[Deleted member 26818]

We are required to bond extraneous-conductive-parts which are likely to introduce a potential.
If the port a cabin is extraneous, conductive and likely to introduce a potential, then bond it.
If it isn’t any one of the 3, then don’t bond it.