What is the reasoning behind having a 0.8 disconnection time for up to 120 volts Uo, but it then jumps to 0.4 seconds as soon as you go over it? Wouldn't it be better 0.8 seconds for 150 volts Uo and under, 0.4 seconds 150 volts and over Uo?
Cookie I got to be the one but are you asking a question or telling us. Nobody really knows how to respond to the 3 post you have made already.When using a single phase supply you get 120 volts line to earth, but on a 3 phase supply you get 138 volts to earth which increases the disconnection time requirements (ie faster trip mandated).
Ok sorry I can’t help you have a good dayAsking for the codes reasoning mainly. And if changing it will violate the IEC's body graph.
When using a single phase supply you get 120 volts line to earth, but on a 3 phase supply you get 138 volts to earth which increases the disconnection time requirements (ie faster trip mandated).
Well, the NEC does frequently talk about 150 volts to ground over or under. Would be nice to harmonize the IEC with the NEC.
No we don't, standard single phase and three phase supplies in the UK are 230V to earth.
The 120V would only usually be relevant to a reduced low voltage supply on construction sites.
[automerge]1574290644[/automerge]
That will be pretty difficult with the big differences between electrical installations in different countries.
Think of it as Time and "energy Received" , cooking a resistor .What is the reasoning behind having a 0.8 disconnection time for up to 120 volts Uo, but it then jumps to 0.4 seconds as soon as you go over it? Wouldn't it be better 0.8 seconds for 150 volts Uo and under, 0.4 seconds 150 volts and over Uo?
The reality is we are saving equipment from fire risk , limiting total amount of energy received - is how we stay safe !Think of it as Time and "energy Received" , cooking a resistor .
Why the disagrement on post #3?
How or why are they incorrect...?