- Reaction score
- 6,878
The same could be for an average British semi. Maybe with two lighting circuits - but two are not required. This gives five circuits. Installation costs are then cut right down.
Discuss AFDD in 18th 2nd Amendment in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
The same could be for an average British semi. Maybe with two lighting circuits - but two are not required. This gives five circuits. Installation costs are then cut right down.
And it satisfies Regulation 531.3.2(iii). Why don't you tootle off and read it.I have to get you to think and read. Your minds is all over the place.
Back to the point. The design conforms 100% to the 18th and its amendments, offering full AFDD protection to sockets. If you cannot see that why are doing the job you are in?
You can't even answer the question @westward10 posted so you clearly have no access to the regs and anyone who quotes the regs as legal clearly has no understanding of their legal statusI have to get you to think and read. Your minds is all over the place.
Back to the point. The design conforms 100% to the 18th and its amendments, offering full AFDD protection to sockets. If you cannot see that why are doing the job you are in?
Football on TV. First things first.@John-SJW you've gone quiet.
So you are stumped then as your circuit design is flawed and you don't know why.Football on TV. First things first.
I the design does not conform to the 18th with amendments, then he can tell us where.You can't even answer the question @westward10 posted
Your design is flawed and is not likely to 100% comply with the 18th Ed as you have stated multiple times.I the design does not conform to the 18th with amendments, then he can tell us where.
So far no has. All I have read is innane circular babble though. Now back to watching the football.
You cannot explain why you think this. A bit of a know-it-all eh!So you are stumped then as your circuit design is flawed and you don't know why.
You cannot explain why you think this. A bit of a know-it-all eh!
Not this this bunch engaging with me now, inc you. Back to togger.you struggle with people who have greater electrical knowledge than you.
And your proposed appliances tot up to?531.3.2
(iii) in order to avoid unwanted tripping by protective conductor currents and/or earth leakage currents, the accumulation of such currents downstream
of the RCD shall not be more than 30% of the rated residual operating current.
And?
Yes it is yours you have not answered any question that has been posted so far and have only chosen to respond with condescending comments about other peoples knowledge of the subjectI the design does not conform to the 18th with amendments, then he can tell us where.
So far no has. All I have read is innane circular babble though. Now back to watching the football.
Sorry, I have to disagree with you, but I wouldn't need to question it.I'd question the ability of anyone designing such an installation.
Don't forget, he's also a Tech WriterWill you drop the sharpen up there is absolutely no need for it in a civilised conversation and it really makes you sound like a bully
The point of this group is for discussion just because someone doesn't agree with you there is no need to belittle them when they present an alternative point of view
You are certainly living up to your profile of Manufacturer / Distributor / Supplier / Inventor - etc and in this thread you have met all four of the areas you operate in
It's not a novel, but I suggest you should read it, whether in bed or not.It is not a novel to read while in bed.
As all the heavy appliance are not on the final ring, well a TV, charging the laptop occasionally, fridge, maybe the occasional use of an electric kettle (kettle can go on the hob), and a vacuum cleaner used a few minues per day. Big load on a 32A final ring eh?And your proposed appliances tot up to?
Again, tell me where it does not conform to the 18th and its amendments? Round and round again.Yes it is yours you have not answered any question
Tell me where it does not conform to the 18th and its amendments? Round and round again. I will be waiting a loooooong time!It's not a novel, but I suggest you should read it, whether in bed or not.
But there again you may drive yourself mad, as there maybe so much that you don't agree with or don't understand.
You have been asked questions by a number of posters and you continue with your inane comments without answering the questions askedAgain, tell me where it does not conform to the 18th and its amendments? Round and round again.
Well he is scoring plenty of own goalsWhen does the football come back on?
Nope you are not understanding the question in relation to Regulation 531.3.2(iii). Do you not understand it?As all the heavy appliance are not on the final ring, well a TV, charging the laptop occasionally, fridge, maybe the occasional use of an electric kettle (kettle can go on the hob), and a vacuum cleaner used a few minues per day. Big load on a 32A final ring eh?
If you read, and understood, this thread you will know I do. Earth leakage by plug in appliances. I posted 531.3.2(iii), which the poster who brought up 531.3.2(iii). up never did.Nope you are not understanding the question in relation to Regulation 531.3.2(iii). Do you not understand it?
So the combined leakage will not exceed 9ma.If you read, and understood, this thread you will know I do. Earth leakage by plug in appliances. I posted 531.3.2(iii), which the poster who brought up 531.3.2(iii). up never did.
The exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 198h and amendments.
Are you saying it will? If so, explain.So the combined leakage will not exceed 9ma.
Are you saying it will? If so, explain.
I am not the one bringing it up. so. Are you saying it will? If so, explain.Why don't you answer the question instead of just throwing things back all the time?
I am not the one bringing it up. so. Are you saying it will? If so, explain.
The excercise design conforms to the 18th and amendments.
I asked the question this ain't the tail wagging the dog you know.Are you saying it will? If so, explain.
You did not ask a question. You developed an attitude pointing to 531.3.2(iii), not saying anything else. If you have something to offer the thread then explain it. So far you have not. The exercise design conforms to the 18th and amendments.I asked the question this ain't the tail wagging the dog you know.
I have been reading this thread and so have many others and it is clear you DON'T understand the regs and you only chose to post a small section of 531.3.2 at post #159 I'm assuming you have read the rest of the section so you SHOULD be able to answer the question asked earlier in this threadIf you read, and understood, this thread you will know I do. Earth leakage by plug in appliances. I posted 531.3.2(iii), which the poster who brought up 531.3.2(iii). up never did.
Ahh now we find you are reading the wrong regsThe exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 198h and amendments.
See #176.You did not ask a question. You developed an attitude pointing to 531.3.2(iii), not saying anything else. If you have something to offer the thread then explain it. So far you have not. The exercise design conforms to the 18th and amendments.
The exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 18th and amendments.I have been reading this thread
I did.See #176.
The exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 18th and amendments.
If you cannot see that get out of the business. Someone who cannot see it should not be going into people's houses.
An intelligent mind, but one which fixates upon preconceived notions.Utt
Utterly pointless posts, as most of yours seem to be.
It's a shame because you do seem to have some electrical knowledge, but not enough to allow you to maintain a good debate on the subject.
Trying to explain to three know-it-alls who cannot see that the the exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 18th and amendments, is not debate.maintain a good debate on the subject.
My God! A phycologist as well! It gets better.An intelligent mind, but one which fixates upon preconceived notions.
Trying to explain to three know-it-alls who cannot see that the the exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 18th and amendments, is not debate.
If you cannot see that it conforms get out of the business. I would not let you into my house to do anything.
And will itI did.
The exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 18th and amendments.Part of the design of an electrical system should take into account earth leakage current. How do you know it complies if you can't answer the question?
You've been asked time and again to explain, but simply repeat the mantra that the installation would be compliant with regulations.Trying to explain to three know-it-alls who cannot see that the the exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 18th and amendments, is not debate.
If you cannot see that it conforms get out of the business. I would not let you into my house to do anything.
The exercise circuit is sound and conforms to the 18th and amendments.
Which post or post it again.I did.
Are you sure any intelligent person would have answered the questions asked about 50 or 60 posts agoAn intelligent mind, but one which fixates upon preconceived notions.
Something of a dilemma when you go all in on a notion that turns out to be flawed.Are you sure any intelligent person would have answered the questions asked about 50 or 60 posts ago
I originally mentioned earth leakage. It is you who developed an attiude, is making an issue of it. You run with it Mate. Still waiting.Which post or post it again.
Reply to AFDD in 18th 2nd Amendment in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.