Discuss Explosion Proof Wiring Systems in the Electricians' Talk | All Countries area at ElectriciansForums.net
If that was a dig at Eng I can assure you, he does know what he's talking about!
haha its really funny reading some of these old posts by people with limited knowledge trying to look like they know what their talking about.
a little knowledge is a dangerous thing!
Can you please explain why you have dug up a 2 year old thread with the purposes of using it to have a dig at other members?
ive been working on a hazardous area site for the past 13 years 10 unaided so the statments i have made are correct so please dont embarrass yourself trying to disprove them.the rambo guip is in reference to your " Challenger 2 main battle tank ive been in the TA " bit.youre not in the army so let it go.
im not an expert on anything so ill only write what i know to be true.
its been fun, have a nice weekend.
ive been working on a hazardous area site for the past 13 years 10 unaided so the statments i have made are correct so please dont embarrass yourself trying to disprove them.the rambo guip is in reference to your " Challenger 2 main battle tank ive been in the TA " bit.youre not in the army so let it go.
im not an expert on anything so ill only write what i know to be true.
its been fun, have a nice weekend.
I didn't understand the Rambo bit either! Rambo didn't need a tank, he was a one man army!Yes, which can only be done in a controlled way, not instantaneously as you say. A part of me thinks due to your attitude and tone that you happen to be the one without any knowledge. You seem rather defensive for someone who supposedly has nothing to prove.
I'm also not quite sure I understand the 'Rambo' quip?
Hey ho though, you know everthing so I guess that makes everyone elses knowledge irrelevant. Sorry to have questioned you Your Grace!
haha its really funny reading some of these old posts by people with limited knowledge trying to look like they know what their talking about.
a little knowledge is a dangerous thing!
Lol nice to know it took you 3 yrs to make glands off.. speedy gonzalas, before you were unaided. lmao some achievement. Whahahahahahahahahahaha. Can you link up with specs and post some funnies, in the jokes section. Whahahahahahahaha
yep thats right ive been doing it badly for 13 years for the same chemical company checked by the same insurance inspector and the same instrument engineer,im surprised im still in emploment hahahahaha your pathetic attempts to discredit me will never work Whaahahahahahah *pulls black cloak over head and disappears in a cloud of smoke*
for god sake never knew i had to justify myself, this is a forum for offering advice not a site for proving yourself.Im not having a dig just saying that experience isnt everything and just because someone has done something for a long time doesnt mean there good at it or know what they are doing
for god sake never knew i had to justify myself, this is a forum for offering advice not a site for proving yourself.
Not asking to prove yourself just the regs so can have a quick look to satisfy curiosity
now this does make me chuckle.ive got the qualifications but these are just bits of paper that anyone can get, the real proof in the pud is experience and having every single job inspected and passed by inspectors who have said they would be more than happy to give me recommendations but i dont have to justify myself, im earning a living and in 25 years have never been unemployed or sacked and had only 3 employers.Im not having a dig just saying that experience isnt everything and just because someone has done something for a long time doesnt mean there good at it or know what they are doing
hydrogen or acetylene?Peppaz, I think you have been exposed to too many IIC gases!
the reg is BS EN60079 series. does that satisfy you on this sunny saturday?Not asking to prove yourself just the regs so can have a quick look to satisfy curiosity
is that near area 51 in nevada?I did my gas training at the Safety in Mines Research Facility. A fantastic place, explosions galore!
The test rig for testing motors is fun, they have a motor with an over large flame path. Quite spectacular when the surrounding atmosphere is at just below to upper explosive limit.
is that near area 51 in nevada?
I wouldn't know, I am actually a heavy goods train driver, I appear to have registered on the wrong forum. Damn this predictive text !
after having time to reflect on my posts ive decided to apologise to D Skelton, sorry mate it was wrong and unfair of me to mock and name call, hope you will accept this and think no ill of me.
ill just add this, the gap does not occur during a explosion its always there and it is measured with feeler gauges. just remember to use a silicon based grease to prevent the flamepath from rusting.
ah yes the oxymoron that is the intrinsically safe tester. i would personally IR in the conventionally way in the safe area,but if you need to do it in zones 2 or 1 on the kit make sure you do a gas test and have a hotwork permit.
pit electricians, ah the ones who when ty wrapping swa above ground still leave large drip loops between every ty.
Actually this was a genuine question, seeing as you were/are working in a Hazardous Div 1 Zone 1
enviroment. The reason i asked, is that the old universal standard ''Intrinsically Safe'' Metrohm (that i still own) is no longer classified as intrinsically safe, and so no longer allowed on European EX 'd' sites. Soooo, i was wondering what has the Metrohm IR tester been replaced by, when needing to conduct IR tests in such hazardous areas??
I will hasten to add, that i still use my Metrohm intrinsically safe in such areas, as i have always done for the last 30 odd years, ...and with no detrimental effects whatsoever!! I also believe they are still sold by the present manufacturer for use within hazardous areas outside of the EU. That's Europe for you!! lol!!
Quite the little battle going on here, still, I think it could be more epic! Pepparz, for a bit of all out war why don't you ask Eng about 3/8" unthreaded earth rods, I know he loves talking about them!
Hi,
Continuing on from E54's post ref the Intrinsically safe Metrohm; yes I still have mine too.
If I remember rightly this was deemed not suitable for use in the UK when the regs were updated due to the fact that it had to produce a test current of greater than 1mA ( if memory serves me right ) and we had to revert to the standard tester ensuring we carried out an atmosphere test before use. All of our resistance tests carried out with an Intrinsically safe Multimeter.
There was also something about dissipating stored energy, which I believe the Metrohm also catered for, ie, testing MICC where you needed to discharge the stored energy as the cable acts like a capacitor.
As E54 says , you can still buy this Instrument, but it is now called a Safety tester.
Regards.
H+S drivel gone mad - an example - used to work on a huge site (Gas Board), had a bar on site n' everything, well it also had a heated outdoor pool.
back in the nineties I turned up one day with my cossie and popped down at lunch time to it, all gated up so went back to the jobsworth and asked "whats happened to the outdoor pool?"
"filled it in and slabbed over it"
me: "er, why?"
Jobsworth: "dangerous. Someone might drown"
I nearly passed out from the miasma of stupidity in the air
Ha ha stood there in your flip flops, speedo's and towel...ha ha
Question is do you still own the Speedo's? Lol
Reply to Explosion Proof Wiring Systems in the Electricians' Talk | All Countries area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.