even a wet-pants can bend something correctly. (usually something that we have installed).Sounds like you are possibly exceeding the minimum recommended bending radius?
SY (and CY) are not to any BSI standard, so strictly speaking a risk without assessing their suitability. Also they are not UV tolerant so can't be used outdoors, further limiting where they are suitable.Off the top of my head the closest thing i can think of is SY but doesn't offer the same mechanical protection as SWA.
I just chanced upon this video this morning.
Probably not, it's all new builds so would have gone through various designers and planners.Sounds a bit OTT but better to be over engineered than unsafely installed, although sounds like the swa would have been plenty adequate in this case!
Was the 'building control guy' the designer?
Probably not, it's all new builds so would have gone through various designers and planners.
For me, conduit serves no purpose there, the steel wires literally do its job already.
It wasn't in ducting it was conduit.No purpose on the wall, perhaps, but ducting serves both a protective and practical purpose on the underground section.
That is odd.It wasn't in ducting it was conduit.
Aye, i was puzzled to be honest. Just black placcy conduit. Ducting is essential imo but conduit is just odd. I thought it might have been a one off that someone had gotten wrong, but every one of the 80 houses on the estate is like it.That is odd.
Duct allows for cable replacement if needed, also gives a little more protection against the odd stone, etc., if badly back-filled. Also not likely to rust!
Or if pulling it through and it's tight, do more harm than good.It can help prevent tearing the outer sheaf when rough --- bodgers pull it through the wall without a care in the world.
Not a bad shout that i didn't think about that.Some people like to put small size SWA in conduit on walls to keep it straight, in other words for cosmetic appearance.