Discuss Landlord - Electrical Safety Certificate in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
Is that what was supplied & fitted?
Seems like he has jumped a step by not submitting the original Report and then giving you or your sister a chance to discuss your options with him. I would ask for a copy of the original EICR and if it is not forthcoming inform him you will take it up with NAPIT. Unfortunately we are plagued with electricians, and I use the term lightly who see a fuse board which may not comply with current requirements and which is still perfectly servicable and suggest it is replaced.
No. They did not supply and fit them. They have been in for over 10 years. The electrician initially said these lights had to be replaced with new IP rated lights.
He quoted for the bathroom lights, but then did not go ahead with the job, because they had the wrong lights to replace them (this is another story).
The important point, is the fact that he said that the new fuse box (with it's all-singing circuitry) would supersede the safety of the lights, because the fuse box gives the safety & protection needed.
Being a electrician and in the letting game, I can say if its registered with building regs. You are 100% legal, legally its gas and portable appliances which have regular inspections.
Please can you clarify exactly what you mean by being registered with building regs? Building regs are documents, nothing more.
Also please specify which laws require regular inspections of gas and portable appliances?
That's actually a matter of debate. An EIC issued for the replacement of a DB is simply certifying the DB installation as compliant with BS7671 as this is the scope of work. However, there is a need to ascertain that the safety of this is not impaired by the existing installation and will not impair the safety of the existing installation. So it's necessary to ensure that the protective devices (assuming of a different type) will operate in the required time and that the connections you have made in the DB are satisfactory. So some would argue that this can be met by verifying cpc continuity to the first point on the circuit as opposed to the last. It's actually a bit of a grey area as you are not in any way certifying the existing installation (although you should make any necessary comments on it in the appropriate section of the EIC).As we all know a fuseboard would require a full certificate of tested circuits.
This is HSE territory regardless of letting portfolio. I would go on to explain further. "Regs" my error, building control being the collective word.
What work do you believe they have taken ownership of?The whole point is that someone has taken ownership of the work.
Your right its an mot, but if that installation kills somebody. Then the contractor is found not to have a paper trail of procedure. Then who's fault is it? Not the landlord. The electrician. .
Your right,The electrician and the landlord could both be found guilty.
Your right,
Only if they are in cahoots or limitations have been set by the landlord. If the landlord has employed a registered contractor received original paperwork, its the electrician who's to blame. Ask your inspector when he comes. Im not into this one up game, I'm providing my experience, my agents wont even allow me to let unless I have the latter
Inspector of what? The only inspector I ever see is the one who does our explosives storage licence.[/QUOTE
Well then you have no knowledge to even comment on this thread.
This is sounding very my dicks bigger than yours. And moving off the subject.
Your governing body inspector for approved contractor status or domestic installation. Relative to the thread. Niceic ECA Napit
Reply to Landlord - Electrical Safety Certificate in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.