Looking for opinion on whether this scenario is compliant

[telectrix]

then the disconnection time is compliant (200mSec.).

 

[The Ghost]

Ok then I am worrying about nothing. Good.

 

[Strima]

Ok so what about table 41.1 TT?

That’s for over current protective device disconnection not RCDs.

 

[littlespark]

Keep at them about the broken sockets, and the day before they say they're coming, go back and replace with the old ones.
But then, youll be sitting with broken sockets in your shed for the next 4 years

 

[Adam W]

So everything is RCD protected and the CU was compliant when it was installed.
Cross bonding is no longer necessary.
The water and gas supplies should be bonded unless the pipes are plastic.

 

[Gavin John Hyde]

When you say council @Vortigern do you mean a housing association? if so and its curo you can contact the head honcho victor da cunha and he will actually personally respond to emails and deal with any issues like this! one of the few decent chief exec's i have come across, most of the housing associations around the west country are quite decent, Bristol council are one of the few in the region who still own there own properties, have done work for them.. they are slow paying and quibble over silly little things in the price and everything is as cheap as possible. Would not do contract work for them again.

 

[The Ghost]

do you mean a housing association

Mmmm not sure now you ask!

 

[The Ghost]

That’s for over current protective device disconnection

Yes thats fine so I am testing socket and get Zs of 11.75, compliant or no? (RFC 32A)

 

[Dillb]

Yes thats fine so I am testing socket and get Zs of 11.75, compliant or no? (RFC 32A)

You will usually get higher Zs values ok a TT than a T-N system. What is the Ra valie?

 

[westward10]

Frankie??