Discuss Regulation 434.5.2 - Time a conductor can withstand fault current in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Gigsy

-
Reaction score
46
Can anyone help me clarify the formula in regulation 434.5.2, the time a conductor can withstand a fault current without sustaining damage.

t=k2 x S2 / I2

The regulation states I is the effective fault current.

Does effective fault current mean the prospective short circuit current/ prospective earth fault current or does it mean the maximum operating time / current characteristics (In x 5 for a type B MCB)
 
The formula relates to the live conductors only so pefc is not applicable as that formula for csa of a protective conductor is transposed to S= I2t square root over K

In the formula t=K2S2/I2 then t is the maximum time in seconds that the live conductors can withstand the fault current until damage to the conductors and the surrounding insulation
 
Last edited:
S is the size of the conductor required to satisfy the equation I2t square root /K
I is the fault current squared, K is the conductor material generally 115 for copper conductors bunched or within a cable or 143 for not bunched or incorporated in a cable.
K can be different values depending on the material of the protective conductor ie 52 or maybe 51 for the armouring of an swa cable
 
Last edited:
The formula relates to the live conductors only so pefc is not applicable as that formula for csa of a protective conductor is transposed to S= I2t square root over K

Hi Ian, the 1st sentence of the reg says it's to prevent overheating of any conductor or cable, so it must include the CPC. Also, PEFC may be higher than PSSC but would still affect the line conductor.
 
Hi Ian, the 1st sentence of the reg says it's to prevent overheating of any conductor or cable, so it must include the CPC. Also, PEFC may be higher than PSSC but would still affect the line conductor.
Regulation 434.5.2 says a given fault current that will raise the live conductors from the highest permissible temperature in normal duty to the limiting temperature can be calculated from the formula t=K2S2/I2
No mention of the cpc other than The I2t value for a fault below 0.1 seconds must be equal to or less than the energy withstand of the conductors.
The above sentence of regulation 434.5.2 states that any given fault that shall not raise the temperature of any conductor so includes the cpc but that is a given for basic protection of the conductors for the characteristics for fault protection by a protective device. the below formula is for live conductors (t=K2S2/I2) as stated in the regulation
For a protective conductor it is the adiabatic equation as given in 543.1.3
 
Last edited:
Regulation 434.5.2 says a given fault current that will raise the live conductors from the highest permissible temperature in normal duty to the limiting temperature can be calculated from the formula t=K2S2/I2
No mention of the cpc other than The I2t value for a fault below 0.1 seconds must be equal to or less than the energy withstand of the conductors.
The above sentence of regulation 434.5.2 states that any given fault that shall not raise the temperature of any conductor so includes the cpc but that is a given for basic protection of the conductors for the characteristics for fault protection by a protective device. the below formula is for live conductors (t=K2S2/I2) as stated in the regulation
For a protective conductor it is the adiabatic equation as given in 543.1.3
It does indeed say that, thanks for the explanation.
 

Reply to Regulation 434.5.2 - Time a conductor can withstand fault current in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi there. I’m hoping for some advice. I currently run a small limited company that provides IT services, both commercial and domestic so I...
Replies
0
Views
613
Hi everyone Ive just had an electrical condition report conducted on a mixed-use property, and I am extremely surprised that after the last report...
Replies
11
Views
2K
Does anyone perform a prospective short circuit and, where no RCD / RCCBO, a prospective Fault Current test on the end of circuits on inspection...
Replies
6
Views
2K
Hello all, I've just been perusing the AM2/E/S threads on here. Thought you might like a bit of a review. If, like I did, you find yourself...
Replies
7
Views
2K
I've started to move over to AMD 2 forms for my CU installs, if only because the schedule is so much easier to tick and I can stop sticking labels...
Replies
4
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock