Hi, just wondering how other sparks, go about confirming main earth bonding continuity when supply cannot be isolated, ze and pfc can be enquired wich is fine but what happens if you cant disconnect main bonding earth, is previous test results good enough to confirm?visual checks good enough? can this be a limitation on a condition report or not? And how would we overcome this if it was an initial verification or a minor works, just wondering what's the minimum acceptable to tick those boxes.

Theres so many variables it's hard to gauge what would be acceptable to tick those boxes on test certs.

Help much appreciated

Many thanks
 
You can’t simply say that the main bonding cannot be verified for initial verification for new work or additions as per regulation 132.16.
 
You can normally confirm the Zs and PFC by measurement without isolating the supply.

Of course that assumes you can access the terminals safely without isolation, and that is something you should consider very carefully before attempting it. Many panels and switch-fuses have mechanical interlocks to avoid being opened in the energised position for very obvious safety reasons, and even removing covers that might expose live busbars is something you really ought not to do live in case of accidental contact.

What you cannot do without isolation is confirm Ze as that requiers the supply earth to be isolated from the installation to measure without any parallel earth paths via bonding to service pipes, structural parts, lightning conductors, etc.
 
is previous test results good enough to confirm?visual checks good enough? can this be a limitation on a condition report or not?

Who said that?
 
Not sure I understand what you mean?
I’m simply saying that for initial verification you cannot state that the bonding conductors haven’t been verified as adequate for the new or altered works.
The regulation is in fundamental principles of bs7671
 
A bit more background on why it can't be isolated, and the size/complexity would help.

If you have access to the incoming supply point somewhere and the earth is routed in some non-obvious way, you could always use a wander lead and confirm it is at the expected sort on resistance (guess X metres route length, guess CSA at 16mm or whatever, look up table and compute)
 
Last edited:
Hi guys help appreciated, so the installation is an events venue, two massive transformers on site that feed two big switchboards, we dont have authority to start opening up the switchboards even if we could isolate, , is it acceptable to start disconnecting main incoming earths from buss bars etc, it just seems very intrusive work on a big install for conditon report, and the same stands for initial verification, I wouldn't have thought every time we add a 20amp radial circuit off a sub main board, we have to isolate the whole venue and strip down a switchboard. This is why I would have to inquire ze and pfc wich helps me there but then it's the ticking of main earth and main bond "connection/continuity varified" the way I see it it is asking connection or continuity verified so would previous results and a visual be enough to tick without a lim as like you say we cannot lim on initial verification How would you guys go about those situations, condition report and initial verification.

I feel this is a common situation and people would just have a quick look and give it a tick but I like to be as furough as possible and wonder if I'm missing a trick.
 
Hi guys help appreciated, so the installation is an events venue, two massive transformers on site that feed two big switchboards, we dont have authority to start opening up the switchboards even if we could isolate, , is it acceptable to start disconnecting main incoming earths from buss bars etc, it just seems very intrusive work on a big install for conditon report, and the same stands for initial verification, I wouldn't have thought every time we add a 20amp radial circuit off a sub main board, we have to isolate the whole venue and strip down a switchboard. This is why I would have to inquire ze and pfc wich helps me there but then it's the ticking of main earth and main bond "connection/continuity varified" the way I see it it is asking connection or continuity verified so would previous results and a visual be enough to tick without a lim as like you say we cannot lim on initial verification How would you guys go about those situations, condition report and initial verification.

I feel this is a common situation and people would just have a quick look and give it a tick but I like to be as furough as possible and wonder if I'm missing a trick.
Course you wouldn't, that's what Zs@DB is for.
 
Zs at db on the test shchedual yes but that doesnt satisfy the ze and PFC at origin section on the top sheet for an initial verification does it? These are two different tests
I believe it would. The purpose is to check that the fault path is unbroken no? (Values will of course be higher due to length)

Came across this; https://---------------/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=205&threadid=26810
 
Also let's not forget the 3 accepted methods of obtaining Ze; Measurement, Calculation or Enquiry. All 3 are acceptable and would fill that gap for you.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Ls98bx
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)

Thread Information

Title
Confirming earth bonding continuity when cannot isolate supply
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
32

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Amusingold,
Last reply from
loz2754,
Replies
32
Views
6,330

Advert

Back
Top