part p does not apply in Scotland and does not have to be followed. I think this seems strange as I was on a course and was speaking about it and I was informed that if you work for an english based company you will be put through the part P course just incase you happen to be sent to england to do any work for them!
 
'Part P' is an attempt to protect those who live in a dwelling. It is a subset of the electrical profession.

PartP has formalised the situation such that it is now an illegal act if for work to be carried out by someone who is deemed to be incompetent. If the person doing the work is competent but rubbish, then at least the client has a recognised means of seeking attention.

There is no trauma. Even a fully 'I know it all properly certified electrician' would have to become a member of a registered body simply because there isn't any real choice. The Client needs to know the person doing the work is competent, as does the Insurance Co, and indeed the Lawyer if the dwelling changes hands, and it's no good just shouting out you are a qualified person because it don't mean a thing!

What is the alternative? Back to the good old days where 'Eddie did it!' or move on and accept that PartP is a recognised and worthy part of the electrical agenda. Perhaps we should look upon PartP not so much as a nuisance rather than a stepping stone to a more rational approach to Competent Electricians in all areas.....

Perhaps the way forward is for all electricians to become 'Competent'. Remove the marketing issues and let all the governing bodies coalesce into one glorious empire ..... I put myself forward for Chairman ..... oops, sorry, lost the plot .... I love digressing, especially when putting labels on CU's.... where was I

Yes, I think PartP has a place as it allows for competent people to focus on a particular area. Maybe the area of focus needs to be adjusted but no doubt there will be quite a delay while the committee pontificates..... :rolleyes:
 
No disrespect to other trades meant here,BUT,we are probably the most certificated trade out there, you have to have this you have to have that,part p,city&guilds,nvq's,17th edition,2391 etc etc etc.Where does it end..!! we seem to bear the brunt of a complete bunch of ----ers sat at desks with nothing better to do (and who probably have no electrical qualifications or experience of the real world) Make it illegal to buy anything from the likes of b&q apart from a plug top fuse...!!! and leave the real work to the professionals such as ourselves. Paper chasing a...holes the lot of them. Rant over,pressure released..!! :D:D:D
 
but part P isn't a qualification, it's compliance. Once you apply (if you do) to Niceic for example they'll need to assec your compatancy and see if your working accourding to the regs e.g part p, so u got to know it, just read it up, and save the bucks;)
 
No disrespect to other trades meant here,BUT,we are probably the most certificated trade out there, you have to have this you have to have that,part p,city&guilds,nvq's,17th edition,2391 etc etc etc.Where does it end..!! we seem to bear the brunt of a complete bunch of ----ers sat at desks with nothing better to do (and who probably have no electrical qualifications or experience of the real world) Make it illegal to buy anything from the likes of b&q apart from a plug top fuse...!!! and leave the real work to the professionals such as ourselves. Paper chasing a...holes the lot of them. Rant over,pressure released..!! :D:D:D


Apart from the 17th Ed regs, you don`t need ANY of the rest .........
 
Does this mean that Electricians will now have to take a "revised 17th edition course.
When will people realise that the various 16th and 17th edition courses do not teach theory and practice (I had plumbers on my 16th course) they teach how to extract information from BS7671 and if you have passed the 16th there is no reason to take the 17th or any further updated courses unless BS7671 undergoes a substantial change in format as from the 15th to the 16th.
I am getting tired of seeing advertisements " 16th Electricians Reqd." and now "17th Edition Electrician Reqd." and next "17th Edition (Updated) Electricians Reqd."
As for part P, in all my 40 years as a sparks I have never heard a better joke.
Cheers (a disgruntled FarverFred)
 
Hi Farverfred,

I think the most worrying thing is that the lack of awareness by the customer as to the real meanings of the BS7671 standard and I agree with you that the courses are designed to teach how to retrieve (and possibly interpret the information) from the standard. This is similar to a lot of standards in being at the moment.

Better policing is required but in truth there is too much cross trades involved and a lot of people seem only to be interested in price.

Hopefully things may change,

Best wishes,

Rex
 
Apart from the 17th Ed regs, you don`t need ANY of the rest .........

the 17th edition qual is basically used to prove you can NAVIGATE your way through BS7671, it does not give you the practical or theoretical skills to enable you to be a qualified spark.You suggest its ALL you need.Ask yourself this - would you be prepared to let some numpty whos been on the dole for ten years or been shelf stacking all their working life (no disrespect intended to these people) to go on a 3 day course to get their 17th edition,then let them come into your house or workplace and do a rewire just because of this.Me thinks not ...!!!!
 
Hello LD Electrical, if you are replying to my post, I think you might have got the wrong end of the stick. When I say that the 16th is all that is required, unless another change in format occurs, I was referring to fully qualified Electricians.
I agree that no sane person would expect anyone who had completed a 3 day course with no prior qualifications and experience to come anywhere near an electrical installation. In my darkest nightmare I would not suggest it.
Cheers, FarverFred.
 
im all for a corgi type system for electricians it needs sorting out,the labc dont care one bit at the mo about work being done they're all broke and crying about the cuts. we want regs that matter but dont cast the earth or your just asking for people to keep going down the cowboy road.
 
Hi all,
I've been out of the loop far a while - primarily because of the attitude of my LABC and the DEMANDS that I pay my hard earned cash to one of the "Professional bodies"!! I went off to the Middle East to work, and very pleasant it was too. I'm back now and considering picking up my tools in the UK again, in the hope that some of the regs had been relaxed because they're more trouble than they're worth!!! For the record, I'm 2381/2 (17th Ed) qualified, 2391 (they don't give that way easily!!) and all the 2377 PAT stuff - and even paid to do one of those Part "P" domestic installer courses in the days before we were forced into joining a scheme just to work normally (because I was told it would suffice and wouldn't need to register as I had proved my competence). I got fed up with paying the LABC £120 to have my work inspected (sometimes, if they bothered to turn up) by a non electrically qualified bloke. Part P has not stopped the cowboys. Why will they just not let qualified electricians get on with the job? If you aren't qualified and get caught then thats your problem, cowboys will always take the chance regardless. Disqualified drivers still drive, and get caught - so it will be with unqualified tradesmen. Why won't they let us do our job and face the consequences of our own actions? I was 30 years in the RAF before coming back into the real world, and have been horrified at how much control the state tries to keep.
 
Regarding electricmick's comment;
I got fed up with paying the LABC £120 to have my work inspected (sometimes, if they bothered to turn up) by a non electrically qualified bloke.

Is this correct that a person without an electric qualification checks an installation on behalf of the local authority?
 
Regarding electricmick's comment;
I got fed up with paying the LABC £120 to have my work inspected (sometimes, if they bothered to turn up) by a non electrically qualified bloke.

Is this correct that a person without an electric qualification checks an installation on behalf of the local authority?

From what I've seen lately LABC couldn't care less & don't know what the results on a cert mean as long as they get a cert, if you have someone unqualified from the council coming to inspect electrical work then thats a joke, I've never experienced this myself, what I have experienced is the LABC lack of knowledge in the 'definitions' of Part P.
I still think Part P is a tax to stop cash in hand jobs, again from what I've seen Part P has failed miserably, it won't be scrapped because middlemen & the council are making a fortune off your back.
 
OK just had to do some digging through the Part P document and it seems to be a little out of date as it refers to complying with BS7671:2001.................:eek: And this was just downloaded from the planning portal!!!
 
can anyone enlighten me bout what the new part L regs are gonna cover , heard thats the new hoop us sparks are gonna have to jump through
 
until bs7671 is statutory law , any man and his dog can carry out instalation work , our only foothold as qualified tradesmen is the electricity at work regs 1989 , i just hope the proposed law going through parliment that every home needs a full test and inspect cert for electrical safety , before they get home insurance
 
until bs7671 is statutory law , any man and his dog can carry out instalation work , our only foothold as qualified tradesmen is the electricity at work regs 1989 , i just hope the proposed law going through parliment that every home needs a full test and inspect cert for electrical safety , before they get home insurance

Not strictly true Sparks1974, The building regs are statutory and part p advocates bs7671. So if not 7671 what standard does the man and his dog work to?
 
How To Improve Part P

Scrap defined scope

I've lost count of jobs that i have attended where a new boiler has been installed and bonding to the services has been upgraded to current regs only to find on closer inspection that the 10mm bond to the clamp on the gas meter is joined to the original clamp with undersized cable and shoved into the cavity with the hole resealed.​

I have spoken to a gas guy who informed me he was worried about the lack of technical advice offered on his part p course,the whole of the class filled in a certificate together, they were showed how to wire 2way lighting on a stairwell and if they asked any questions they were reminded exactly what parts of thier book to read that would be covered in the exam.​

Would a defined scope installer be able to correctly identify different earthing arrangments, or understand fully the results taken on a ring final test before they add an extra socket or spur. I imagine some would but i would guess the majority would not. This means that potential faults may get overlooked and the only people to benifit from this situation is the course providers.​

Conclusion

Scrap defined scope, its potentially dangerous and confuses the customer and does not benifit part p in any way except to make it a joke!​
 
This whole situation STINKS ! nothing more nothing less !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what the rule makers are saving is gas is dangerous BUT electricity ISNT !!!!!!!!!!!! what makes me mad is ANYONE can do most electrical jobs including domestics without any knowledge AT ALL about the dangers that pose from shoddy electrical work eg an adition or alteration to an electrical circuit ! minor works my butt to us it might be BUT to joe public these installs could STILL pose a danger of badly installed workmanship ! it really is a sore subject for me as ive been to sort out some real crap and dangerous installs BECAUSE the diy bloke or doll CAN as non notifyable !!!!! WHY cant we have the same as gas installers ? non QUALIFIED CANT touch as simple as that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
There are an infinite number of dangerous tasks that the householder and members of the public can undertake. Should we allow them/us to climb up ladders, replace a roof tile, point the chimney, fit a new staircase. How many deaths are due to electrocution in the home each year and compare that to the 3000 or so in car crashes-should we criminalise home car mechanics?

This idea that we should regulate against the incompetent, those lacking experience or stupid if taken to its logical conclusion would result in everyone having to pay a specialist for every task that was beyond his or her qualified experience.

The role of the professional is to serve the public, if Joe public makes a mess of the electrics in his house the professional electrician puts it right. It is the demonstration of competence and skill at a fair price that elevates the professional electrician into the premier league: while the rogues and incompetent languish in some lowly non league division.

The need for a comprehensive electrical report when a house changes hands goes a long way toward remedying electrical malpractice. The incompetent amateur will be slowly worked out of the system because there will be no financial advantage in doing work, or paying a cowboy for work that has to be put right by a skilled electrician at a later date.

The status of electricians is best raised by focusing on doing good work. People in every area of endeavor who provide quality service at a reasonable price succeed in the long run.
 
Ill be honest Part P is another tax on electricians now made more difficult with the wholesalers selling CDU's to the general public for peanuts i have a board covered in pics of dodgy electrics some from rented properties and some potential fire pics as all you guys have seen over the years ,how many times do you go into some ones house and they say well i just added this extra socket found one in an elderly couples house wired in bell wire joined with terminal block under the carpet nice eh not notified not done correctly just bodged who is to stop them
 
There are an infinite number of dangerous tasks that the householder and members of the public can undertake. Should we allow them/us to climb up ladders, replace a roof tile, point the chimney, fit a new staircase. How many deaths are due to electrocution in the home each year and compare that to the 3000 or so in car crashes-should we criminalise home car mechanics?

Should we use the same argument with gas installs ?
 
Should we use the same argument with gas installs ?

How are we different to gas installers?
Anyone can buy gas fittings and products the same as electrical.
Anyone can carry out the work as long as it's tested, connected and commissioned by a Gas Safe registered engineer. This is not allowed under part p as you can only certify your own work (or go down the labc route).
There is nothing to stop anyone carrying out other plumbing work, I'm in the process of moving a radiator now.

The main difference is that plumbers are not constantly whining about the need for professionalism in their trade.

And how is part p a tax?
It costs me £1.50 to notify a job and that's paid to the niceic not hmrc, the same as my annual fee.

Although to be fair I am paying more tax since part p because of the extra work it's generating for me.
 
‘Part P’ or should it be ‘All Poo’

I have been running my own electrical contracting business for the past four years and have been Part P full scope with ELECSA before I transferred to NICEIC, big mistake, purely for marketing reasons as the NICEIC are more popular, (but certainly NOT the best). They have builders, plumbers in there as it’s easier to pass, hence more membership, more money for them.

Having paid my annual Part P fee and registering every job at £1.50+vat with Elecsa, it cost £3 with
NICEIC, £1.50 for LABC and £1.50 for consumers insurance which is compulsory with NICEIC. (Yes you pay your customers insurance for the work you have done.) With Elecsa it is an option and the consumer pays it if they want to, but not you. Another money making spinner for NICEIC and you guessed it, it’s NICEIC’s own insurance.

So Part P, does it work and if so, for who?

Well it’s a tough time out there with stiff competition and price’s dropping through the floor and competing with ‘non Part P’ registered, companies and individuals I was dropping my prices and still losing work and had to make 3 electricians redundant. It was time to get tough myself so I reported some of these Non registered’ electricians to Elecsa and NICEIC. Both were not interested as they told me they only administer Part P, not police it!!. One advised I report to the LABC, so I did.

The LABC told me that they will only look into it if safety or building regs had been compromised and if I had sufficient evidence, although this did not mean they would take action. They would NOT take action for someone just not registering a Part P job if no ‘actual’ regulation had not been adhered to.

This would cost too much and they do not have the manpower resources available. The chap at LABC I spoke to said they are aware of the problem and appreciates my concern but there are ‘to many’ electricians as well as the public doing work that should be certified and it is an impossible task to deal with. He also mentioned that B&Q don’t help as they sell consumer units and have wiring diagrams mounted above the selves showing the public how to connect them!! This is encouraging the public to ‘have a go’ and no mention on these boards that it is against the law or that this work must be certified.

Good point.

I could not believe it!! The so called ‘powers at be’ are powerless!!

I asked myself “Why am I paying £460, plus a days unpaid time for the assessment and paying £1.50 for each job, (£3.00 with NICEIC) I register. What’s in it for me and who benefits apart from the likes of ELECSA, NICEIC etc.

All these organisations want your money but do nothing for it. They are even in competition with each other. I have had email marketing from NAPIT to transfer to them as they had a better deal than ELECSA and NICEIC.

B&Q don’t give a dam about how they effect your business or Part P with what they sell, they just want to make many more £Millions.
ELECSA, NICEIC, NAPIT They want to make money out of us but don’t support us.
LABC are aware of the problems but don’t want to know, it cost them to much.

Joe Public, well do they know what part P is? They just require a cheaper job doing as possible. It doesn’t matter whether your Part P or not. I had two people last year ask if I was Part P registered, one of these jobs was to replace a light fitting in the lounge which of course is not a Part P requirement, the other thought Part P was PAT, Portable Appliance Testing. The public are unaware of it’s existence or the ones that do get there ‘wires crossed’ and misinterpret what it is and so to do a lot of electricians.

Do you ever hear in the press or trade magazines of anyone getting prosecuted? There were a few when Part P was first introduced. Is there any publicity or advertising campaign for Part P? No because it cost to must and no organisation will put money into it.

Well enough is enough when my Part P lapsed at the end of September 2010, I decided to ‘pull the plug’ and I did not renew my Part P and won’t be doing either unless things change, very unlikely with government cutbacks there will be even less resources available.

I am all for a registered system but by ONE organisation similar to how Gas Safe is operated not five competing with each other for business.

We electricians are all round losers when it come’s to Part P. If all current Part P registered electricians refused to renew there Part P when due then this may finally send out a message and when these organisations suffer financially as a result only then will they do something.

Mazdaman
 
Well presented,most feel as you do
unfortunately most of us dont seem to have the backbone to act as you have

The end is nigh for part p though
My veiw is that it will quietly fade away as sparks lose all patience and interest with it
The peak of people registering has probably been reached, and the downwards spiral wont be far behind or it may have even began
 
spot on mazdaman, I've been part p registered with elecsa for 4 years,priced a job last year for bathroom electrics but the house holder got a cheaper price and went with them.2 months ago got a phone call off the house holder to say that the bathroom lights were tripping and the original contractor couldn't find the fault.So the good lad that i am i went down to see what they had done.As the lady of the house showed me the bathroom that had been completed (the one that i was under cut on) she was pointing to the lights that had been installed, but it wasn't the lights that got my attention it was the electric towel rail that was fitted directly into the shower enclosure.I phoned elecsa to report it and they said because the installer wasn't registered with them that there was nothing they could do, the only thing would be the customer to report them to trading standards.My renewal is due in march 370+vat.So i pay the renewal,pay the notifications,lose out on jobs and when i report a cowboy nothing can be done.So i think its time to cancel direct debit.
 
Ok you have given up on being Part P registered. As an example.

My daughter who lives in the UK (I don't) had her house rewired as part of an extensive refurb. Her electrician, 65 years old and lifetime electrician but not Part P forged the papers and Building Control checked his registration status and refused to pass the work. After such an abuse of trust my daughter had the builder expose all the electricans work so that it could be fully inspected by registered electrician. After being threatened to be sued by my daughter as well as considering whether it was a police matter he paid for the builders work, the electricians charges and expenses that my daughter had run up in bringing the matter to a solution.

If you want to break the law you have to determine at what level of honesty you want to function at. Are you going to advertise or describe yourself as fully competent but cannot certify work or don't tell people, and rely on them being gullible?

On this website the less competent and law breakers as appropriately called cowboys, everything you write about present injustices I agree with, joining the lawbreakers, however attractive at first glance, is not the way forward.
 
If you are referring to Mazdaman's post he is not proposing to break the law. He is a competent electrician and he is just not accepting the responsibility for notification. It is perfectly legal for him to do notifiable work, it just falls on the client to do the notification if they choose to use a non part P registered electrician. He is not saying he will not certificate work or not do it to BS 7671.

Your case is completely different, the person in question was attempting fraud.
 
My renewal is due in march 370+vat.So i pay the renewal,pay the notifications,lose out on jobs and when i report a cowboy nothing can be done.So i think its time to cancel direct debit.

Until such time sanctions are imposed on the scum of our industry why should you pay some **** to regulate you ? If more people woke up and smelt the coffee the part p scam would collapse and the dole queues would be full of people who could never practice what they preached because the scum would under cut them as well as us.

Good on you for being a realist.
 
So by dropping out of your relative scheme and saving £370, and breaking the law by not notifying labc, you will be able to drop your prices by so much that you will be able to undercut all the other law breakers out there.

I don't think so.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
Part P & the 17th Edition.
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
165

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Spudnik,
Last reply from
Dan,
Replies
165
Views
55,196

Advert

Back
Top