Yes ADS or EEBAD

Presence of Earthing conductor, CPC, PDC,Sup's if req'd, etc etc
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But not all the installations we work on are 17th edition compliant, so the use of EEBADS is still justified IMO

Sure. But the OP stated certificate not report, so I can only guess that it isn't a periodic for this reason and is therefore some kind of installation certificate. Therefore it must be installed to the 17th (unless it was designed to the 16th - I doubt it) so would have to be ADS, no?
 
With respect, if the main bonds etc are say 6mm eg 15th edition, then they are adequate but do not conform to current regulations. Therefore I would say EEBADS is appropriate.

My opinion may differ from others.
 
With respect, if the main bonds etc are say 6mm eg 15th edition, then they are adequate but do not conform to current regulations. Therefore I would say EEBADS is appropriate.

My opinion may differ from others.

I was going to come back with a counter argument, but I've been there before on this forum and I can't be a**ed tonight!

Let's agree to disagree!! :)
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

YOUR Unread Posts

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
Protective measures for fault protection
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
10

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Sly,
Last reply from
pevvers,
Replies
10
Views
16,533

Advert

Back
Top