- Reaction score
- 4,167
It is not defined as "supplementary equipotential protective bonding" in BS7671, so I'm unclear as to what point you were trying to make.That’s supplementary equipotential protective bonding.
Discuss Shower supply, ever needed additional earth cable. in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
It is not defined as "supplementary equipotential protective bonding" in BS7671, so I'm unclear as to what point you were trying to make.That’s supplementary equipotential protective bonding.
Sorry.It is not defined as "supplementary equipotential protective bonding" in BS7671, so I'm unclear as to what point you were trying to make.
Yes it did. And so did the 17th. My point was that this was not there to reduce the Zs but to maintain the touch voltage at a safe level until disconnection occurred (even though this would not be within the prescribed disconnection times).Point is this:
The 16th allowed supplementary bonding to be used where a low enough value of Zs for ADS could not be achieved.
Reply to Shower supply, ever needed additional earth cable. in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.