Discuss Eicr's in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
88
Evening all,
I'm reading up for 2395, when doing EICR'S and IR tests, when removing neons, lamps and sensitive equipment are things like electric showers, water heaters ect classed as sensitive. Do most people remove all these items or prefer to connect L+N together and test to earth at 250V.
Thanks.
 
so many appliances now contain electronics, i always link L to N and IR from there to E. i only would IR L-N if certain that nothing was in circuit or on new installs.
 
so many appliances now contain electronics, i always link L to N and IR from there to E. i only would IR L-N if certain that nothing was in circuit or on new installs.

Nah, give it a quick blip at 1,000V first, fry everything then full up with the 500V test for the cert -- reading are always then spot on!

Just make sure you get your cash and are out of the house before the customer starts using any appliances ......
 
readings should be the same. a 250V test might not show up a potential problem as well as at 500V though.
 
Sorry if I'm being a a numpty (picked that up from the forum) but why test LN to E at 250v and not 500v??? I'm old school so be gentle
 
Sorry if I'm being a a numpty (picked that up from the forum) but why test LN to E at 250v and not 500v??? I'm old school so be gentle

My default IR test on EICRs is 500V from L+N to E. Most equipment, with the exception of surge suppression components to earth, will cope with this without damage. I've not killed anything yet this way (as far as I know).
 
L-N to E 250V seems like a sensable start! If the reading shows Ok then procede to 500V! Saves frying any electonic component.

I don't know the scientific answer, it might just be an Urban myth!:sultan:
 
if i test using the L-N to E method, i write on the limitations "Insulation resistance testing has been carried out to regulation 612.3.3 where it was impractical to disconnect load(s).

You shouldn't be writing anything in the limitations box like that, this is for limitation of testing, e,g you cannot isolate a part of the installation. When you test correctly like you have, then don't put it in the limitations. It doesn't matter which IR test method you use, they are both acceptable, so you don't need to explain your reasons why.

Cheers…………….Howard
 
In the limitation for testing I put: Where lamps, neon lights and/or equipment with electronic sensitive components cannot be disconnected, carry out insulation resistance test between line & neutral connected together and earth at 250 Volts.
 

Reply to Eicr's in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hello all, I hope you're all keeping well. I have a question regarding insulation resistance testing. Whether doing a single circuit IR test or...
Replies
9
Views
646
I'm practising EICRs on friendly locations as I'm still in training - technically done my 2391-52 but frankly need loads more practise. I've just...
Replies
11
Views
934
Hi All, My colleague and I are currently doing PAT/ISITEE Testing, and we've hit a snag with a bit of equipment - we've got 19" Racks for our...
Replies
8
Views
520
Hello everyone, Hope you're all well. I'm carrying out an overall/global insulation resistance test on a newly wired 3 phase installation we did...
Replies
24
Views
1K
In my line of work it's very rare that I ever have to change a DB. I'm largely in maintenance; occasionally have to add new circuits etc. so in...
Replies
3
Views
686

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock