What have you done and why is it not in compliance with current Regulations.
Why have you replaced the circuit breaker.
because, according to it's psychiatrist, it needed to change.
Blood and a stone come to mind.
As long as the protective device satisfies ADS and no additions have been made then no.
Zdb
-
Replacing an MCB with another MCB of the same type/rating is like for like. Replacing it with an RCBO is not.
I would definitely do a MEIW certificate and perform all of the tests if replacing an MCB with an RCBO.
Some people would even do a full EIC but I think that's OTT IMO.
I would definitely do a MEIW certificate and perform all of the tests if replacing an MCB with an RCBO.
Some people would even do a full EIC but I think that's OTT IMO.
D
Deleted member 26818
Yes I did just inform you.
There is one instance of the term in Approved Document Part P.
Yes you need to attach a documented Risk Assessment to the MEIWC if you are installing a socket-outlet without RCD protection.
If you are not installing a socket-outlet, then it’s not applicable.
There is one instance of the term in Approved Document Part P.
Yes you need to attach a documented Risk Assessment to the MEIWC if you are installing a socket-outlet without RCD protection.
If you are not installing a socket-outlet, then it’s not applicable.
A risk assessment is for departures from BS7671, see Regulations 120.3, 133.1.3 and 133.5 for such instances where this may be applicable. The risk assessment must prove that any departures do not affect the safety of the installation and persons using the installation and only apply to alterations and extensions to the circuit.
D
Deleted member 26818
Regulation 411.3.3 is the only instance where there is a requirement for a documented Risk Assessment in BS7671.
There are other Regulations where a Risk Assessment is required, but there is no requirement for the Risk Assessment to be documented in those instances.
There are other Regulations where a Risk Assessment is required, but there is no requirement for the Risk Assessment to be documented in those instances.
That is not correct. If you refer to the model Minor Works Certificate in BS7671 it clearly refers to the Regulations I have noted in #17 and this can cover a multitude of departures.
D
Deleted member 26818
I’m afraid it is correct.
None of the Regulations you quoted require a documented Risk Assessment.
Am i the only one who minor works everything?
If i change a cracked lightswitch like for like i carry out a full range of tests and certify it.
Reasons are habit, and also do alot of work in social housing so always wanting to cover my back. Photo of every job also saved in the computer job file.
If i change a cracked lightswitch like for like i carry out a full range of tests and certify it.
Reasons are habit, and also do alot of work in social housing so always wanting to cover my back. Photo of every job also saved in the computer job file.
Finding out how to spell risk assessment, sorry Buzz honest
I see no reason not to do that and lots of reasons to do so. If you read the notes in appendix 6 for person producing the certificate it's pretty clear you could but they use the term "may".
They say intended to be used for alterations so I think that eliminates the "may" part in the next line if you are doing like for like change. Still an alteration though not a design change.
D
Deleted member 26818
An alteration would be if you changed something from the original design.
For instance, installing down lights in a room instead of a pendant.
An addition would be if you were to add something to the original design.
For instance, installing down lights in a room whilst leaving the pendant in place.
Replacing existing equipment because of damage or deterioration, would be maintenance.
For instance, installing down lights in a room instead of a pendant.
An addition would be if you were to add something to the original design.
For instance, installing down lights in a room whilst leaving the pendant in place.
Replacing existing equipment because of damage or deterioration, would be maintenance.
Fair enough you can do that.
This article sums up my opinion better than I could..
Majoring in the Minor Works Certificate - https://professional-electrician.com/technical/majoring-minor-works-certificate-napit/
I have a little confusion over MWC's.
Currently we are adding a lot of smoke detectors to rental properties due to the change in the law around HMO licenses. Often its just upgrading from a D LD1 to a D LD2 system type. On smaller properties its just taking permanent feed off a local lighting fixture and putting a smoke detector in the living area, which is usually being used as a bedroom. And then wiring to smoke detectors in all the bedrooms upstairs from the exsisting one on landing via loft.
When completing MWC's for this above work its is necessary to perform R1+R2 for every fixture on the lighting circuit? A lot of these places have 1 lighting circuit feeding both floors so performing R1+R2 at every point takes a while and all I'm doing is adding 1 smoke detector. Would it be acceptable to confirm R1+R2 at my new smoke detector and the fixture immediately after, as I have not done anything that will affect the circuit beyond this.
Edit: A word
Currently we are adding a lot of smoke detectors to rental properties due to the change in the law around HMO licenses. Often its just upgrading from a D LD1 to a D LD2 system type. On smaller properties its just taking permanent feed off a local lighting fixture and putting a smoke detector in the living area, which is usually being used as a bedroom. And then wiring to smoke detectors in all the bedrooms upstairs from the exsisting one on landing via loft.
When completing MWC's for this above work its is necessary to perform R1+R2 for every fixture on the lighting circuit? A lot of these places have 1 lighting circuit feeding both floors so performing R1+R2 at every point takes a while and all I'm doing is adding 1 smoke detector. Would it be acceptable to confirm R1+R2 at my new smoke detector and the fixture immediately after, as I have not done anything that will affect the circuit beyond this.
Edit: A word
Zdb
-
They suggest that a issuing a Minor Electrical Installation Works Certificate for replacing a damaged socket outlet is good practice and I agree.
I always test the end to ends to confirm that it is a complete ring, check the Zs and do an RCD test so it makes sense to record the values.
I don't always bother with the IR test though if I'm being honest
R1+R2 is taken at every point for eic.
In your case I'd take it at the furthest point to check the circuit your working on is safe and at the point your spurring off because some kind of parallel path might be the reason you have continuity at the furthest point. That's just an opinion off the top of my head. A reference to the regs would help.
Probably you don't know the furthest point of the circuit anyway. No?
It differs from house to house but we generally install radio link bases downstairs from existing light fixtures then replace the existing landing smoke with a radio link and hard wire from there to upstairs rooms via the loft.
Don't usually know where last point on circuit is, usually not too hard to figure it out though.
Going back to the op original question , here is an example i come acroos a lot , carry out an eicr and there is a 32 amp mcb protection a 2.5mm radial socket circuit on the 2nd floor of an office.
We are then ask to carry out remedial work, now do you .
A. downrate to a 20amp mcb.
B. downrate to a 20 amp rcbo.
We are then ask to carry out remedial work, now do you .
A. downrate to a 20amp mcb.
B. downrate to a 20 amp rcbo.
No risk assessment allowed for RCD omission in domestic.
OFFICIAL SPONSORS
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
Advert
Thread Information
Advert
Advert
TrueNAS JBOD Storage Server
-
-
Understanding TrueNAS JBOD Servers: A Comprehensive Guide- Started by Dan
- Replies: 8
-
