In that case you may have a problem using your PME earth in this building, especially if your kids are going to be playing with hoses bare footed. There could well be a potential difference between true earth and the PME earth in this instance. If you did have a grid in the foundation floor that could be bonded, then that would have been acceptable.
The ‘children with bare feet and hoses’ was my over-the-top example of why it is always better to design for worst-case scenarios, that’s all. It’s unlikely to happen in real life! I mean, how could I allow my little children to spray water all over an electrical installation? It’s completely unthinkable.
They might make it rusty!
Looks like you’re going to have to go the TT route and your rods as you suggested, at opposite corners tied on to the structure and the structure to your MET. No need for 25mm cable 10mm will be fine!! Just make sure you go down a good depth with your rods, at least 2 rods deep at each corner, preferably 3 rods if your Ra is decreasing significantly the deeper you go with the second rod....
OK, and thanks for the advice, and sorry for the delay, I had to sleep on this one.
I still don’t understand why it’s not OK (electrically) to use the ‘exported’ PME,
in parallel with a TT system. I’ll come clean: I’ve never really understood this. But I’ve never met an electrician on any site who could explain it to me either, without going round in circles, or using the ‘that’s how it’s done’ response and getting annoyed. (Which means of course he had no clue either.)
In accordance with modern practice, the floor slab is underlain by a 1000-gauge PVC sheet on sand blinding, so is probably electrically isolated from the earth. Rag bolts go from the concrete to the metal stanchions, but these do not pierce the DPC. But then of course the stanchions will be bonded to earth via the new TT system.
In the case of a lost Neutral on the DNO’s side of the N-E link, presumably the problem is that load current will attempt to return to the star point via the earth infrastructure
which includes all the structural metalwork, appliance casings and so on, which someone might be touching, so the current path would pass through the victim and into the general mass of earth. Or is the point of breaking the PME to prevent this happening in the remote building? (Since breaking the PME is really the same as breaking the N-E link at the service head, through which the fault current would need to flow.) BUT if there are additional low-impedance earth paths present on the consumer’s side – ie my stakes, what is the problem? I just can’t see it. Perhaps I’m being thick.
Plus anyone touching exposed metalwork would divert some of the current and trip RCDs.