Testing.
I know you can do an R2 as oppose to R1+R2.
So, if I decided to take this route how could you check compliance, cheers.
 
I am really trying to understand the question. Honest I am. If you can measure R2, why can't you measure R1 and therefore R1+R2? For that matter, if you're going on a wander, why not test all 3 conductors individually?
 
I am really trying to understand the question. Honest I am. If you can measure R2, why can't you measure R1 and therefore R1+R2? For that matter, if you're going on a wander, why not test all 3 conductors individually?

Yes R2, so referring to wandering lead. What if you don't have access to R1 and Rn, that was whole point to the question.
Thanks the pict i think you are probably right but whats the formula, would be handy to know.
 
??Because you can touch the outside metal casing to items if they are fixed and for whatever reason can't be accessed, moved or just generally to expensive to get involved with. Common sense no??

Yup you have it in one..............best explanation ever well done mate you have it sussed:)
 
Now......this should be burnt into your mind,

Zs = Ze + (R1 + R2)

Ah come on your not being fair here, that is burn trust me but:-
You said you would have to know your Zs, when infact you would have to know your Ze also
And even if you knew these you would have to rearrange this formula to something like
Zs-Ze-R2=R1
Cheers 4 help anyhow.
 
Pff and i didnt even get a thank or like :(
lol, ive learn something then.

I'll give you a thank 'and' a like if in your next post you tell me the difference between Zs and Ze...............can't be fairer than that mate.
you have 5 minutes to look it up:)
 
I'll give you a thank 'and' a like if in your next post you tell me the difference between Zs and Ze...............can't be fairer than that mate.
you have 5 minutes to look it up:)

only just read- Ze is external
Zs is whole shabang anything a bit harder?
 
If you measure R2 this is your confirmation that your cpc is safely connected from the MET to the accessory.
Once you know this and that your IR tests are OK, then you are safe to start live testing.
You would then use Zs to confirm polarity and that your circuit would meet the required disconnection times.
 
Why not? apparently calculated R1+R2 is perfectly acceptable, defo sure i read that in regs if some 1 could help clarify that, cheers.

Rearranging Zs = Ze + (R1 + R2) to (R1 + R2) = Zs - Ze looks good on paper, and is mathematically correct, but in practice you can measure R1+R2 a lot more accurately than Zs or Ze.

Also, Ze is measured with bonding and parallel paths disconnected whereas Zs is measured with parallel paths in place, so subtracting Ze from a measured Zs doesn't necessarily give R1+R2.
 
Zs - Ze to gain R1+R2 is not acceptable at all.

Ze + R1+R2 to gain Zs is acceptable if I am correct.

On initial verification I will always do all tests and on EICRs I tend to do R2 and Zs of each circuit.
 
If you measure R2 this is your confirmation that your cpc is safely connected from the MET to the accessory.
Once you know this and that your IR tests are OK, then you are safe to start live testing.
You would then use Zs to confirm polarity and that your circuit would meet the required disconnection times.

Thank you very much Mr Burns, perfect answer of what i was looking for. I couldn't get my head around the fact that an R2 test alone was sufficient. This only confirms continuity as you have kindly pointed out.

It is very confusing as on the test sheets it does say R1+R2 OR R2, implying just an R2 would be acceptable. I was scratching my head thinking how is that going to comply with the required times.

Well i'm glad some 1 understands me at last.
 
R2 is best used when doing EICR's to light fittings.

For new installation work the R1+R2 is best, then you can confirm polarity at the same time.
 
It is very confusing as on the test sheets it does say R1+R2 OR R2, implying just an R2 would be acceptable. I was scratching my head thinking how is that going to comply with the required times.
Just because R2 is all you need to record does not mean that is all you should test.
 
??Because you can touch the outside metal casing to items if they are fixed and for whatever reason can't be accessed, moved or just generally to expensive to get involved with. Common sense no??

So you don't have access to Line or Neutral ? How does the lamp light up when switched on?
 
Well you guys obviously know a lot more than i do, so o.k but isn't there not some exceptions?


No not in my book. Do it once and do it right without trying to make your live easier by taking shortcuts that will come back and bite you.
 
R2 is best used when doing EICR's to light fittings.

For new installation work the R1+R2 is best, then you can confirm polarity at the same time.

Would then changing a consumer unit count as new installation work as you are not installing any cables they are existing in regards to R1+R2. Think about what i'm actually asking here instead of getting boot in. (I know it would be an EIC before you start with the funny answers). If you dont get the question just ask me, cheers
 
As you are changing the consumer unit you have to prove by means of testing that existing circuits are safe to be energised.
 
Would then changing a consumer unit count as new installation work as you are not installing any cables they are existing in regards to R1+R2. Think about what i'm actually asking here instead of getting boot in. (I know it would be an EIC before you start with the funny answers). If you dont get the question just ask me, cheers

Originally Posted by Murdoch
R2 is best used when doing EICR's to light fittings.

For new installation work the R1+R2 is best, then you can confirm polarity at the same time.


You need to listen and learn what the guy is trying to tell you mate..............he knows what he's talking about.
Out of interest..............how old are you?
and that is not asked in any way shape of form in a patronising fashion you ignorant young idiot..............last few words were a joke btw:)
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
essex

Thread Information

Title
R2 option over R1+R2
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
56

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Regs,
Last reply from
Sintra,
Replies
56
Views
5,469

Advert

Back
Top