Hi Guys.
Here's a good one for you, to rack the techies brains out there. Any views on the following please? By the way I'm NICEIC approved, Q.S. MIET status with IET. Been doing if for years.
I have telephoned NICEIC technical today but as always there are unanswered vagaries surrounding my question. So here goes. I do some EICR's for a famous brand leisure park. Static caravans. Some of the caravans have had 2 part air-conditioning units fitted. My gas safe colleague condemned and cut off the gas to some caravans/static homes as the air-con is failing the `gas spillage test'. He says this is actually RIDDOR reportable.
Anyway, this got me looking at the air con units myself. Outside part is mounted under the caravan, bolted to uni-strut to the concrete base. Micro-bore copper tubing then goes to the 2nd part of the air con unit inside. To get around the air con guy not having any electrical qualifications, he simply puts it on a plug so he can say it's a mobile piece of equipment. (He's wiring is horrible by the way, wires the plug with 4 core HO5vv cable, and cuts a core off at the plug leaving copper showing and not entering the plug). Anyway, so leaving an exposed conductive part, C1 etc etc....
So anyway, my thoughts regarding the pipework were, extraneous conductive part entering the caravan (micro-bore copper), copper needs earth bond back to MET. Reg 411.3.1.2 Bearing in mind this is a caravan in a caravan park, so a special location, within a special location. Section 708 and section 721.
I have also referred to Guidance note 8 on Earthing & Bonding.
Now the NICEIC tech tells me whether or not it is an extraneous conductive part all depends on whether or not I measure 23000 ohms from the MET to the copper. Ok, so if it's less, then I bond it, if it's more then it's `just a piece of metal' and it isn't extraneous. Well that's all well and good, but there's other things to take in to consideration, like the famous TT weather scenario
That might read 10 ohms on a nice wet day, or 500 or more on a dry summers day. Or no earth at all in dry clay. So if I measure from caravan MET IR test and get more than 23000 ohms today on a nice hot day then I don't bond it as it's showing as non-extraneous and just a piece of metal. But what about when it's poured with rain, or snow, the concrete base is soaking, the uni-strut that it's mounted on is soaked and and there's rain dripping off of the air con unit and micro-bore copper. Bearing in mind the metal chassis and tin covering of the caravan, which in some cases the copper rubs against. So if I ran my tester from MET to micro-bore copper on that day I may get an entirely different reading and less than 23000 ohms and therefore it IS extraneous as the weather has had an effect. NICEIC tech says if I bond something non-extraneous then I may be introducing a potential that isn't there.
So my question is, like with TT, different days, different scenarios. Do I bond back to MET or not?? My view is that I should. Under 16th we bonded anything and everything, even if it looked shiny
Any thought's gratefully accepted!
With thanks,
Gary T
Here's a good one for you, to rack the techies brains out there. Any views on the following please? By the way I'm NICEIC approved, Q.S. MIET status with IET. Been doing if for years.
I have telephoned NICEIC technical today but as always there are unanswered vagaries surrounding my question. So here goes. I do some EICR's for a famous brand leisure park. Static caravans. Some of the caravans have had 2 part air-conditioning units fitted. My gas safe colleague condemned and cut off the gas to some caravans/static homes as the air-con is failing the `gas spillage test'. He says this is actually RIDDOR reportable.
Anyway, this got me looking at the air con units myself. Outside part is mounted under the caravan, bolted to uni-strut to the concrete base. Micro-bore copper tubing then goes to the 2nd part of the air con unit inside. To get around the air con guy not having any electrical qualifications, he simply puts it on a plug so he can say it's a mobile piece of equipment. (He's wiring is horrible by the way, wires the plug with 4 core HO5vv cable, and cuts a core off at the plug leaving copper showing and not entering the plug). Anyway, so leaving an exposed conductive part, C1 etc etc....
So anyway, my thoughts regarding the pipework were, extraneous conductive part entering the caravan (micro-bore copper), copper needs earth bond back to MET. Reg 411.3.1.2 Bearing in mind this is a caravan in a caravan park, so a special location, within a special location. Section 708 and section 721.
I have also referred to Guidance note 8 on Earthing & Bonding.
Now the NICEIC tech tells me whether or not it is an extraneous conductive part all depends on whether or not I measure 23000 ohms from the MET to the copper. Ok, so if it's less, then I bond it, if it's more then it's `just a piece of metal' and it isn't extraneous. Well that's all well and good, but there's other things to take in to consideration, like the famous TT weather scenario
That might read 10 ohms on a nice wet day, or 500 or more on a dry summers day. Or no earth at all in dry clay. So if I measure from caravan MET IR test and get more than 23000 ohms today on a nice hot day then I don't bond it as it's showing as non-extraneous and just a piece of metal. But what about when it's poured with rain, or snow, the concrete base is soaking, the uni-strut that it's mounted on is soaked and and there's rain dripping off of the air con unit and micro-bore copper. Bearing in mind the metal chassis and tin covering of the caravan, which in some cases the copper rubs against. So if I ran my tester from MET to micro-bore copper on that day I may get an entirely different reading and less than 23000 ohms and therefore it IS extraneous as the weather has had an effect. NICEIC tech says if I bond something non-extraneous then I may be introducing a potential that isn't there.
So my question is, like with TT, different days, different scenarios. Do I bond back to MET or not?? My view is that I should. Under 16th we bonded anything and everything, even if it looked shiny

With thanks,
Gary T