- Reaction score
- 5,868
Just the first paragraph.
Reg. in question is (as someone else mentioned) to cover the likes of borrowed neutrals.
I have always designed domestic lighting installs so that if one light is out, then the next is not only on a different MCB, but on a different RCD as well. For instance, on a first floor, all the rooms would be on one or more MCBs, but on the same RCD, and the passage/stairs light would be on another RCD.
On the "more than one circuit into one MCB" argument, I consider it good design to bring lighting circuits near the consumer unit back separately and into the same MCB because of the help it gives to fault finding.
The very last fault finding job I did was to sort a s/c on a lighting circuit, and there were three "circuits" originating from the same MCB, affecting considerable part of the house. After a couple of minutes testing at the consumer unit, I was able to reinstate all but couple of utility room lights, which were left to the following week.
Reg. in question is (as someone else mentioned) to cover the likes of borrowed neutrals.
I have always designed domestic lighting installs so that if one light is out, then the next is not only on a different MCB, but on a different RCD as well. For instance, on a first floor, all the rooms would be on one or more MCBs, but on the same RCD, and the passage/stairs light would be on another RCD.
On the "more than one circuit into one MCB" argument, I consider it good design to bring lighting circuits near the consumer unit back separately and into the same MCB because of the help it gives to fault finding.
The very last fault finding job I did was to sort a s/c on a lighting circuit, and there were three "circuits" originating from the same MCB, affecting considerable part of the house. After a couple of minutes testing at the consumer unit, I was able to reinstate all but couple of utility room lights, which were left to the following week.