no problem in connecting new work into a non-metal CU. i would, however, check all connections in it for tightness.If I was to wire an extension on a house , and the DB does not meet amendment 3 , where do I stand adding new circuits into this DB , is it ok or should it be changed to Amm 3 DB
Know I should know the answer to this but hey ho were not all perfect
My thoughts are it would be ok , now before you all jump down my throat , I only really work on industrial etc so not used to dealing with domestic dwellings and local authorities part p , part f etcwhat do YOU think?
My thoughts are it would be ok , now before you all jump down my throat , I only really work on industrial etc so not used to dealing with domestic dwellings and local authorities part p , part f etc
So not 100% on this hence the thread
So I await the vultures and keyboard warriors to attack me and my imcompetence , LOL
that's him told off by head master Murdoch, is that 50 lashings for not keeping up with the regs .Matey, take a tip, offer your answer and answer questions put to you, then when done give feedback and thanks....
AMD 3 came out nearly 3 years ago ........... I find it tricky to believe that ANYONE who claims to work in the industry doesn't know the answer to this.
I meet sparks regulary that wouldn't know the answer. . . . .Matey, take a tip, offer your answer and answer questions put to you, then when done give feedback and thanks....
AMD 3 came out nearly 3 years ago ........... I find it tricky to believe that ANYONE who claims to work in the industry doesn't know the answer to this.
Matey, take a tip, offer your answer and answer questions put to you, then when done give feedback and thanks....
AMD 3 came out nearly 3 years ago ........... I find it tricky to believe that ANYONE who claims to work in the industry doesn't know the answer to this.[/QUOTE
expected this response, which I don’t mind ( big shoulders ) , yes I just wanted to confirm my thoughtsMatey, take a tip, offer your answer and answer questions put to you, then when done give feedback and thanks....
AMD 3 came out nearly 3 years ago ........... I find it tricky to believe that ANYONE who claims to work in the industry doesn't know the answer to this.
Oh the questions you get asked by other electricians is sometimes bewilderingI meet sparks regulary that wouldn't know the answer. . . . .
I won’t ask you my next question about wiring in wet string then regards latest regsMatey, take a tip, offer your answer and answer questions put to you, then when done give feedback and thanks....
AMD 3 came out nearly 3 years ago ........... I find it tricky to believe that ANYONE who claims to work in the industry doesn't know the answer to this.
I like your your quote , and think it’s good practise , but where do you draw the line on that quoteno problem in connecting new work into a non-metal CU. i would, however, check all connections in it for tightness.
I like your your quote , and think it’s good practise , but where do you draw the line on that quote
Do you check every existing connection every time you add a circuit into a DB
Evening Jamie if you read above quotes, you are going to get 50 lashes by that statementIdeally yes, especially mains
Why?Evening Jamie if you read above quotes, you are going to get 50 lashes by that statement
LOL
Read the threads, personally I think it would be good to add this into regs , regarding extensions and spread of fire , specially when it’s been deemed so important that a big amendment has been introduced about itWhy?
I must add to this thread , when having an extension on residential properties , fire and spread of fire is a major part of the building regs , smoke’s , fire doors , escape routes
So why not introduce ammendmant 3 into this if you are adding new circuits onto an existing DB
Good idea or not ????
Has any of the above quotes ‘ claimed it’s a requirementThere are enough confusing interpretations of what is and what isn't required as it is. Joe Public will spend thousands on a new kitchen but refuse a board upgrade which will cost a few hundred.
We are not the electrical police ............ sure make a suggestion, but don't go round claiming its required, because it sure isn't
Has any of the above quotes ‘ claimed it’s a requirement
Some one quoted ideally yes that’s as near as any one has claimed its required
I wasn't suggesting anyone on here would state it is required, because we all know it's not[/QUOTE
Agreed it’s not a reg
Do you think it would be a good improvement if it was , or a complete waste of time
If it’s a daft idea why the amendment , The amendment was introduced because that many house fires were traced back to DB’sNo. Daft idea.
As I said, a, polite suggestion normally works for me,
Consumer units - IET Electrical - http://electrical.------.org/wiring-matters/55/consumer-units/index.cfmNo. Daft idea.
As I said, a, polite suggestion normally works for me,
I find it tricky to believe that ANYONE whoclaims to work in the industryConsumer units - IET Electrical - http://electrical.------.org/wiring-matters/55/consumer-units/index.cfm
DAFT IDEA ??????????
Yes I would out of professional pride, not saying it's required but I would do it anyway, 20 minutes at the most.I like your your quote , and think it’s good practise , but where do you draw the line on that quote
Do you check every existing connection every time you add a circuit into a DB
Consumer units - IET Electrical - http://electrical.------.org/wiring-matters/55/consumer-units/index.cfm
DAFT IDEA ??????????
Think the IET are by passing the real reason CUs are going up in, imo the reason is /was poor installation practices, read what you will into my opinion, I have said this before on many occasions.I find it tricky to believe that ANYONE whoclaims to work in the industry
Thinks this is a daft idea
Just couldn’t resist it
Sorry left out the word "smoke"Think the IET are by passing the real reason CUs are going up in, imo the reason is /was poor installation practices, read what you will into my opinion, I have said this before on many occasions.
Read the threads, personally I think it would be good to add this into regs , regarding extensions and spread of fire , specially when it’s been deemed so important that a big amendment has been introduced about it
So all the latest regs apply with an extension , but to hell with amendment 3 and the spread of fire
As long as the electrician connecting the circuits up can quote the regs off by heart there will be no chance of a fire at the DB
Yes, the old stuff was built to last, I can't stop saying, the new moduler CU boards are rubbish, only 1 terminal on all connections, bring back solid 2 screw connections on it all, surely they can make such a CU, won't be as flexible as they are at the moment with populating but some compromise is needed.What the IET did was ignore the obvious ......... you never see older wooden and / or metal units up in flames - always the newer FLIMSY carp ............ so to divert attention away from the poor quality products BEAMA conspired with the IET to mandate wrapping their carp products in a bit of metal ............ the bits inside are still pretty rubbish