Discuss Why cover earth wire? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
55
for T@E cable, we cover the bare earth wire with a sleeve of green / yellow. Why?
The basic idea is that if there is a fault then the live wire meets with the earth and covering the wire with insulation potentially stops this action in some cases. Is it not better to have the bare wire to increase the chance of making contact with a live?

I realise that it makes it easy to identify, but all other cables have coloured sleeves.
 
In a typical installation there will be screws and similar that are live but only just shrouded as nobody is supposed to be poking at the back of accessories with the power on. A kinked CPC could poke in to such a hole causing a short.

Now you might say "well that is its job" which is true, it has allowed automatic disconnection, but the result of such a direct arc on to the CPC might blow a hole in it, and then after someone resets the MCB they might have the appliance-end of the failed wire still in contact with the live, making anything attached live and dangerous.
 
because you don't want a L -E fault to occur except when and if there's a fault with the accessory/equipment. or wiring.
 
Keeps cable costs down having the CPC naked, we are just used to sleeving this type of cable.
It probably has a small impact on cost, not as much as the reduced-size based on adiabatic limit (e.g. 1.5mm CPC on 2.5mm cable).

Where the unsleeved CPC also helps is the overall cable size and ease of getting it in to places.
 
Eire use seem to use twin & earth with an insulated earth, you can see examples if you visit screwfix.ie etc. Not sure of the advantages, compared to a bare earth, but I guess it is required by their regs.
 
americans and canadians leave the ground wire (cpc) completey bare throughout entire installation. With one caveat to this they have single core wire insulated with green to act as pigtail between un sleeved grounds usually shoved at the back on the enclosure and accessories front plate

I personally would prefer our T&e cable to be sold with pre sleeved cpc

no more faffing with hanks of green sleeve
 
Is it not better to have the bare wire to increase the chance of making contact with a live?

That's an odd way of looking at it - like fire extinguishers that randomly set your building on fire to justify their own existence!

Round sheathed installation cables (such as NYM-J used in many countries) normally, perhaps exclusively, have an insulated CPC of equal size to the live conductors. Flat cables vary in construction with different approaches to the CPC under different sets of standards. Some top-of-head examples:

Equal insulated: Aus, ROI, Russia
Equal bare: USA
Unequal insulated: Japan
Unequal bare: UK.

Although not all circuits in all the above are required to have a CPC. Japan, for example, is not big on earthing for domestic wiring (they use a US-derived system at only 100-0-100V) and Aus I believe does not require a CPC in a TPS switch cable.

Looking at sleeving though, the paradox is that the country that uses binding-screw terminals with exposed heads on many of their accessories (USA) does not normally sleeve the grounds, whereas the country with partially shrouded screws and terminals that are less likely to contact any bare metal (UK) requires sleeving.
In Russia, CPC sleeves you!
 
I personally would prefer our T&e cable to be sold with pre sleeved cpc

no more faffing with hanks of green sleeve
Being serious again, it would save a bit of effort, though maybe not so much as stripping the CPC is only a bit quicker than cutting some sleeving. What you would get though is an easier sleeved conductor to terminate as the sleeving would be exactly the required size.

I guess the issue is cost and any issues of new cable size not fitting existing glands or junction boxes, etc. Without a change in regulations to require it I suspect most would still choose a cheaper cable, as it is not just the extra PVC for the whole cable length, it is also the greater size and weight to store and transport.

No idea how much, probably a small percent given how much cable cost is dominated by raw copper prices, but there is an argument in favour of least use of the Earth's resources which the RFC and T&E construction were originally driven by.
 
Then there isn’t any errors in the wiring regs and you trust everything Boris is saying . Knowledge comes from asking questions. I found the replies below quite interesting. ?
Whether we agree with a particular reg or not, or trust the wisdom of those who compile the regulations, we still have to follow what they say. Otherwise what's the point of having regulations in the first place? ?
 
because you don't want a L -E fault to occur except when and if there's a fault with the accessory/equipment. or wiring.
Let’s take a case where the insulation of the live conductor is damaged. If the CPC is insulated then no action occurs. Is it better to do the best one can by having a bare CPC which would in some cases cause the protection to fail and continue to do so until the fault is fixed.
More interesting is if there was a fault in the N where the connection of earth to neutral might exist unnoticed for some time.

of course, insulation testing would reveal the problem

sounds like I am discussing wrapping the conductors ( both L and N ) and turning them into SWA like cables?
Is the question “ why isn’t the earth in SWA cable covered in yellow / green insulation” ??
 
Last edited:
The purpose of a CPC, as I understand it, has nothing to do with protecting the cable in the case of damage, eg by nail penetration etc.
But rather to provide connected equipment with a means of connection to the main earth terminal to facilitate ADS in the event of a fault in the equipment.
Please correct me if this is an incorrect correction...
 
It doesn't protect the cable per se but it can protect the numpty who drives a nail into it. The closer the CPC is to an energised conductor, the more likely that a nail that contacts the energised conductor will contact the CPC too, and hence trip the protection instead of just making the nail live. If you want full protection against that then the CPC needs to surround the other cores with enough CSA to take the hit e.g. Flexishield or SWA. But a fair percentage of T+E 'penetration incidents' probably benefit from the presence of the CPC.
 
It doesn't protect the cable per se but it can protect the numpty who drives a nail into it. The closer the CPC is to an energised conductor, the more likely that a nail that contacts the energised conductor will contact the CPC too, and hence trip the protection instead of just making the nail live. If you want full protection against that then the CPC needs to surround the other cores with enough CSA to take the hit e.g. Flexishield or SWA. But a fair percentage of T+E 'penetration incidents' probably benefit from the presence of the CPC.

I was beginning to think that the L and N cores should be wrapped in foil and hence protect from cable damage.This would act as a significant cross sectional area for a CPC.
If the main purpose is to provide an earth to the equipment, then putting on yellow /green cladding doesn’t add anything as it doesn’t cover the screw or clip attachment.
This borders on if you have a cable running to equipment that doesn’t use an earth (eg nest controller) , should one run a CPC to it. The normal answer is yes in case the next job is to replace the kit with something that needs an earth but I always thought that it was to give a little protection against the nail
 
I was beginning to think that the L and N cores should be wrapped in foil and hence protect from cable damage.This would act as a significant cross sectional area for a CPC.
For cables that absolutely need such protection (e.g. non-RCD with risk of nail penetration, etc) you can get Flexishield cable as an intermediate between normal cables (T&E or 3-core, etc) and SWA with its physical protection as well.

Flexishield also seems to last well on farms, etc, according to a spark we have used who does a lot of industrial and agricultural work. Also they do a cat urine flavoured version specifically for that:
 
when I was a apprentice in the late 90s, im sure there was a twin and earth were the earth was sleaved,
I remember working a site in the UK in the late 80s early 90s can't remember exactly but we installed a load of 1.5 with sleeved cpc, didn't take much notice at the time but all other sizes had bare cpcs.
 

Reply to Why cover earth wire? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi, I'm looking to install a new bathroom extractor fan in my bathroom as I have a windowless bathroom and the current one I have installed in...
Replies
13
Views
770
I’m not working on this… not yet anyway, but can someone tell me why there’s a fuse or a link on the earth here? The green wire is bonded to...
Replies
3
Views
341
Hi all. Yesterday I wired in my 3 phase compressor to run off our 53kva generator. I just need to know which colour cable is for which phase as...
Replies
13
Views
2K
I see they're introducing a new type of flat twin cable with a sheathed CPC. In my location there's no requirement to sleeve CPC/bonding...
Replies
21
Views
2K
I have a baffling problem with a newly-installed PIR floodlight and I'd like advice from the forum as to whether it's defective (and should be...
Replies
5
Views
588

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top