And the winner is.......

Simonslimline!

I'll get it in the post on tuesday for you mate, and big thanks to Paul and especially Richard for their help in getting this done.

Do you want to post the answer and explanation up Richard?

Excellent, i am well chuffed with that. ;)

Suppose it's my turn to do a comp next. Ill have a think on that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
For those who got correct answers and want to compare with my thoughts and for those who want to know the answer this is the short and sweet version of my approach to answer this question:

The question asks:
If the new circuit addition complies with the AMD2 version of BS7671.
(It is not asking for good practice or compliance with any other documents.)
If it is not compliant in what way can it be simply redesigned to be compliant.

To design a circuit you need to know the type of circuit, the maximum load and the planned installation method, then you can select appropriate cables and protective device(s) and calculate the earth fault loop impedance and volt drop.

From the question:
The whole existing installation is already compliant so the Ze, Zdb and bonding are already OK. So we only need to consider the new circuit.

The circuit is on agricultural premises (Section 705 special location)
However most of the requirements of section 705 do not apply in a standard office location and any that do apply are already covered.

The BS1363 socket circuit will be used to capacity so the load is 32A.
The installation method is one circuit run in conduit and trunking using 4.0mm² single core insulated cables (method B).
The protective device is a B32 RCBO, so the sockets rated <20A are protected by an RCD in accordance with 411.3.3 and 415.1.1.
EFLI and VD can be calculated from the values given in the diagram.

Current carrying capacity
The current carrying capacity tabulated in table 4D1A for 4.0mm² singles in conduit is 32A so this just complies as there are no other rating factors to apply.

Earth fault loop impedance
Because you have 30mA RCD protection BS7671 permits a maximum Zs of 1667Ω so for the purpose of the question we can say Zs will be nominally complaint with the minimum requirements of BS7671 even on the most cursory look at the circuit resistances.
[I should mention that it would be very good practice normally to comply with the overcurrent device (32A type B) Zs which is 1.44Ω at maximum temperature or 1.16Ω at 20°C for AMD2. (Lowered by 5% in AMD3.) This circuit does also comply with these values.

Volt drop
Volt drop is the limiting factor on most long circuits. We are given the values in the diagram
Calculating this using:
Volt drop (V) = mV/A/m * A *m / 1000

11 * 32 * 45 / 1000 = 15.84 V

Which is greater than the maximum permitted in appendix 4 of 5% of 230V = 11.5 V
Therefore the circuit is not compliant.

So solutions to this problem are (in order of ease):
Close the gap to create a ring final circuit instead of a radial.

Reduce the circuit length by rearranging the cable connections, say to two 30m branches rather than 1 15m branch and 1 45m branch.

Split up the circuit into two circuits to reduce the current demand on each circuit.

Increase the cross sectional area of the cable to reduce the volt drop rating.
Comp Question layouts.jpg
I can give a more detailed breakdown if you want covering all the approaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Congratulations Simon well done mate.

loki
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
For those who got correct answers and want to compare with my thoughts and for those who want to know the answer this is the short and sweet version of my approach to answer this question:

The question asks:
If the new circuit addition complies with the AMD2 version of BS7671.
(It is not asking for good practice or compliance with any other documents.)
If it is not compliant in what way can it be simply redesigned to be compliant.

To design a circuit you need to know the type of circuit, the maximum load and the planned installation method, then you can select appropriate cables and protective device(s) and calculate the earth fault loop impedance and volt drop.

From the question:
The whole existing installation is already compliant so the Ze, Zdb and bonding are already OK. So we only need to consider the new circuit.

The circuit is on agricultural premises (Section 705 special location)
However most of the requirements of section 705 do not apply in a standard office location and any that do apply are already covered.

The BS1363 socket circuit will be used to capacity so the load is 32A.
The installation method is one circuit run in conduit and trunking using 4.0mm² single core insulated cables (method B).
The protective device is a B32 RCBO, so the sockets rated <20A are protected by an RCD in accordance with 411.3.3 and 415.1.1.
EFLI and VD can be calculated from the values given in the diagram.

Current carrying capacity
The current carrying capacity tabulated in table 4D1A for 4.0mm² singles in conduit is 32A so this just complies as there are no other rating factors to apply.

Earth fault loop impedance
Because you have 30mA RCD protection BS7671 permits a maximum Zs of 1667Ω so for the purpose of the question we can say Zs will be nominally complaint with the minimum requirements of BS7671 even on the most cursory look at the circuit resistances.
[I should mention that it would be very good practice normally to comply with the overcurrent device (32A type B) Zs which is 1.44Ω at maximum temperature or 1.16Ω at 20°C for AMD2. (Lowered by 5% in AMD3.) This circuit does also comply with these values.

Volt drop
Volt drop is the limiting factor on most long circuits. We are given the values in the diagram
Calculating this using:
Volt drop (V) = mV/A/m * A *m / 1000

11 * 32 * 45 / 1000 = 15.84 V

Which is greater than the maximum permitted in appendix 4 of 5% of 230V = 11.5 V
Therefore the circuit is not compliant.

So solutions to this problem are (in order of ease):
Close the gap to create a ring final circuit instead of a radial.

Reduce the circuit length by rearranging the cable connections, say to two 30m branches rather than 1 15m branch and 1 45m branch.

Split up the circuit into two circuits to reduce the current demand on each circuit.

Increase the cross sectional area of the cable to reduce the volt drop rating.
View attachment 29192
I can give a more detailed breakdown if you want covering all the approaches.
Great explanation [emoji106]
 
....and big thanks to Paul and especially Richard for their help in getting this done.

All the thanks goes to Richard and Pennychew. I was sat on the subs bench for this one, you wanted to run one, not as easy as you think is it?

Well done Simon and if you fancy setting up the next comp give me a shout. I'm sorting out a prize with one of the forum sponsors later in the week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Lol, bit of a random one to put you in the mood but each to their own!


Lol, it was more the case of having a bit of time together with feet up in front of the telly. Was not expecting text messages from Pennychew but I did offer to help out with the draw.
 
All the thanks goes to Richard and Pennychew. I was sat on the subs bench for this one, you wanted to run one, not as easy as you think is it?

Well done Simon and if you fancy setting up the next comp give me a shout. I'm sorting out a prize with one of the forum sponsors later in the week.


Will do mate, i will give a question some thought and get back to you. Sure i have a worthy prize i can donate also. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I have now posted a more detailed answer in this thread that contains both the question and the breakdown of the answer including calculations for later reference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
As a little update Richard has very kindly asked me if he can donate a socket tester and r2 plug to each of the 5 guys who also got the question right but didn't win.. I think its a great idea and a great gesture from a top man!

If the following posters could PM Richard with your address you will receive these in the post!

Dilog R2 tester.jpgD socket check plug.jpg

1 - Resu
2 – Loki
3 – Leo chaos
4 – Jimmyray
5 – Newtothis

Get your address's sent in chaps!

 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
As a little update Richard has very kindly asked me if he can donate a socket tester and r2 plug to each of the 5 guys who also got the question right but didn't win.. I think its a great idea and a great gesture from a top man!



PM sent.
Thanks to Richard for the generosity !
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
PM sent

Wasn't expecting that tonight. Very generous indeed Richard thank you
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
PM on it's way. Thanks again Richard, extremely generous! Wish the rest of the forum worked the way this part does!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Richard and Pennychew, I am speechless!

Thank you both. My intentions from day one was to get this forum section running by its self. Mentors and Trainees running the place. Looks like a dream is coming true?

I've got such a big smile on my face right now. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I do have to say that it is not all me Pennychew is in on the act as well for the additional prizes. (which will be posted out tomorrow)

And thank you all for your appreciation.

It just did not seem totally fair to have people put in all the effort of answering a reasonably complex question and get no reward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Simon and I are putting our heads together for the next comp. Should have something posted up by the weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Richard and Pennychew what a fantastic gesture by you both, I can only apologise for my absence of late, but other commitments have taken me away from the forum.
I am gutted that I have missed a great competition and prize draw, the TS as been Mine and Pauls Baby for a while now and it is brilliant to see the Mentors and Trainees working together to keep the place running smoothly.

I should be back to putting more time in next week ( you can't get rid of me that easy )

Once again a huge thank you to Richard for not only his involvement but also his very generous gifts to the runners up.
Glenn
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Received my parcel today.
I'll wear the extra bit at any interviews so they know too :lol:
Thanks again

Tested an extension lead I always use as soon as I opened the box, the extension is wired correctly lmao
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I got mine when I came in from work this evening - the 'extra bit' was a very nice touch :yes:
Thanks again Richard !

Trev
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
As above, received mine today. Thank you Richard & pennychew!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

YOUR Unread Posts

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Email
Joined
Time zone
Last seen

Thread Information

Title
*** Trainee Comp 2 ***
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Course Trainees Only
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
106

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
pennychew,
Last reply from
jimmyray,
Replies
106
Views
2,341

Advert